Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White Countries for Everyone!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 20, 2015
1
0
0
#1
ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,895
9,628
113
#2
Sorry, but there is only ONE race: the HUMAN race..People seem to forget that when talking about racism.. :/ A person's color should not matter.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
12,178
6,548
113
#3
Sorry, but there is only ONE race: the HUMAN race..People seem to forget that when talking about racism.. :/ A person's color should not matter.
correct. but if I could, let me add this: the more we talk about and bring up racism, it will remain. if we stop labeling and treat people like people, that would go a long way to helping this problem. and this is for all sides.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#4
ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
You might try looking farther than the end of your nose. You really think England is a country with only the English in it? What were the English before they were called English? How does Scotland, Wales, and the Irelands like how England perceives itself? You are no more and no less what the Americas are -- a mixed bag.

Blame racism all you want, but you're part of the cause, not the solution.

There is a serious problem with racism two ways -- those who promote it to protect themselves and those who promote it to gain extra-special rights. The rest of us really just want to discuss more pressing problems than pigmentation. We don't even think pigmentation is a problem. Immigration? Sure, but not based on pigmentation.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
#5
Black hearts all,
til Christ takes your fall,
and turns your heart red,
til skin color is no dread.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#6
ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
Oh, lovely. British Israelism or Christian Identity? Ain't nobody got time for that crap.
We're one human family. Everyone has been made in the image of God. We all go back to Adam and Eve. This is one reason why evolutionary teachings are so poisonous to society. They promote one group of people being better than others and relegate non-Causasians to the status of being something less than human (which is a load of bollocks).
 
M

MyLighthouse

Guest
#7
ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
Honestly, my family jokes about things like this all the time lol. The "I Have a Dream" speech, goes something like this in my home: I have a dream that whites and blacks would one day unite as one race, etc, etc. :p

But on a serious note, I'm multiracial and come from at least 5 generations of interracial couples of all colors of the rainbow. And looks like interracial relationships are not stopping in my family anytime soon. Jesus is the solution for everything, including race problems. Racism steams from hatred which is from the devil, because God is love. ONE LOVE
 

Reborn

Senior Member
Nov 16, 2014
4,087
217
63
#8
ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
Seahorses for the seahorses.

Right, seahorse321?
 
J

JustAnotherUser

Guest
#9
While it may appear racist, I do see the point in it... America may not be claimed for whites since Natives had the land before us, but in countries like Europe where whites have resided in there are people who are getting upset that other nationalities from other countries are dominating through their birthrate as compared to the actual Europeans (average of children by UK whites - 1.5; Arabic UK settlers at least 3.5 since the immigration rates started to skyrocket in the recent years, etc. Even in white America there have been declines of birthrate as compared to other races, blacks being the second with their own factors.)

It's not racist to point out that there are increase and decrease within a certain race. It would be racist to say that nonwhites should be killed or not have their own families and standards of living, though there's a clear difference when given to the argument about immigration policies. I do agree that if whites want to keep their race to strive then they should increase from the average 1.5 (UK) and 2.5 (US) birthrate and contribute more with their traditional route in order to keep a steady rate of the offspring they have in replacement from the previous generation; which has been in decline since around the time of the 1960's and on (known as the hippie era,) since the most birthrates that contribute with the overpopulation theory has been surrounded within countries like India and Africa where many take refuge within the west.

Anyway, that's just my take on what information I've known. I'm tired of it being just because there are white people who want to bring in certain issues of their own into light then that it makes it automatically racist.
 
Feb 1, 2015
1,198
15
0
#10
My father was the biggest bigot, but strangely it stopped with his children. When I was a minor I followed in his ways, Martin King was slain, I heard it on the radio in my room, I burst into the Den where my family were watching TV, I shouted with glee, Martin Luther King was just shot and killed. Then in 1975 my heart was changed by Christ Jesus, I never wanted to hate anymore.
Jesus Christ is the answer to racism!
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#11
While it may appear racist, I do see the point in it... America may not be claimed for whites since Natives had the land before us, but in countries like Europe where whites have resided in there are people who are getting upset that other nationalities from other countries are dominating through their birthrate as compared to the actual Europeans (average of children by UK whites - 1.5; Arabic UK settlers at least 3.5 since the immigration rates started to skyrocket in the recent years, etc. Even in white America there have been declines of birthrate as compared to other races, blacks being the second with their own factors.)

It's not racist to point out that there are increase and decrease within a certain race. It would be racist to say that nonwhites should be killed or not have their own families and standards of living, though there's a clear difference when given to the argument about immigration policies. I do agree that if whites want to keep their race to strive then they should increase from the average 1.5 (UK) and 2.5 (US) birthrate and contribute more with their traditional route in order to keep a steady rate of the offspring they have in replacement from the previous generation; which has been in decline since around the time of the 1960's and on (known as the hippie era,) since the most birthrates that contribute with the overpopulation theory has been surrounded within countries like India and Africa where many take refuge within the west.

Anyway, that's just my take on what information I've known. I'm tired of it being just because there are white people who want to bring in certain issues of their own into light then that it makes it automatically racist.
I get that. I know what's happening in Europe. Not the first time the Muslims tried taking it over. And it's happening in America too. BUT it's not race. It's Sharia Law being instigated through migration.

It's am immigration problem, not a race problem. It's a problem with a hateful religion, (one of three that affects America. I don't know how many affect other countries), but it's being covered up under the banner of "racism" and "bigotry." And it's happening exactly because we're being taught censorship poorly, but purposely.

Until we actually understand the real problem, all we do is what seahorse did -- stay ignorant while the very-special-equal-rights people lambaste us with some very crappy societal norms.
 
J

JustAnotherUser

Guest
#12
I get that. I know what's happening in Europe. Not the first time the Muslims tried taking it over. And it's happening in America too. BUT it's not race. It's Sharia Law being instigated through migration.

It's am immigration problem, not a race problem. It's a problem with a hateful religion, (one of three that affects America. I don't know how many affect other countries), but it's being covered up under the banner of "racism" and "bigotry." And it's happening exactly because we're being taught censorship poorly, but purposely.

Until we actually understand the real problem, all we do is what seahorse did -- stay ignorant while the very-special-equal-rights people lambaste us with some very crappy societal norms.

I can definitely understand where you're coming from with that as well. Sharia, directly or indirectly, is being supported through the very sources like the media, the left since muslims can claim victimization status (common trait among the left), and rewriting as well as censoring history to make it seem like muslims have had less to minimum blood shed in their hands and letting the victims throughout all middle-east and Indian regions go in vain. But I'm also going to go ahead and say that I am talking about immigration and birthrate statuses as well that can jeopardize certain ethnicity and regions, *as well as economics, as well. How can we support places and people when we can't or are prohibited to start with our own in regards to strive for the right to exist if we are being restricted on questioning and saying anything?
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#13
I can definitely understand where you're coming from with that as well. Sharia, directly or indirectly, is being supported through the very sources like the media, the left since muslims can claim victimization status (common trait among the left), and rewriting as well as censoring history to make it seem like muslims have had less to minimum blood shed in their hands and letting the victims throughout all middle-east and Indian regions go in vain. But I'm also going to go ahead and say that I am talking about immigration and birthrate statuses as well that can jeopardize certain ethnicity and regions, *as well as economics, as well. How can we support places and people when we can't or are prohibited to start with our own in regards to strive for the right to exist if we are being restricted on questioning and saying anything?
Are you talking legal or illegal immigration? I'm very opposed to illegal immigration. As for legal, I really do think we need to readjust the choices. I know Joe McCartney has gone down in history as an idiot. He wasn't wrong in worrying about communism taking over our country. 60 years later and I'm left thinking it already has.

It could be worse. It could be Sharia Law.

But we're not supposed to even talk about this or we're bigot racists.
 
S

Siberian_Khatru

Guest
#14
If we only had a planet for the Chinese, a planet for the Russians, a planet for the Mexicans, so on and so forth, we'd all be a lot happier.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#15
It wouldn't matter. People will group together over most anything into in-groups and then turn on everyone else (e.g. the out-groups).

The Irish versus the Italians, greasers versus socs, etc...

Immigration is about a great many things that have zero to do with race.


If we only had a planet for the Chinese, a planet for the Russians, a planet for the Mexicans, so on and so forth, we'd all be a lot happier.
 
J

JustAnotherUser

Guest
#16
I've always had a feeling that the Italians and Irish hate each other. Don't know fully on the history for when it comes to them other than when they were immigrants and not considered as white due to not speaking English. :rolleyes:

Illegal immigration is no doubt a problem in America. We don't secure the borders and seem to be the only country in the world who lets illegals in and gain the benefits that legal citizens should be having. That's another topic in of itself.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#17
If we only had a planet for the Chinese, a planet for the Russians, a planet for the Mexicans, so on and so forth, we'd all be a lot happier.
Not really. Then I'd never know that pineapple goes well with chicken and rice. :eek: I mean I could live life without ever eating Russian or Mexican foods, but I hear others like that stuff. lol

This really may not be about different cultures as much as wrong religions and beliefs being forced on others.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#18
I've always had a feeling that the Italians and Irish hate each other. Don't know fully on the history for when it comes to them other than when they were immigrants and not considered as white due to not speaking English. :rolleyes:

Illegal immigration is no doubt a problem in America. We don't secure the borders and seem to be the only country in the world who lets illegals in and gain the benefits that legal citizens should be having. That's another topic in of itself.
In America, that feeling that the Irish and the Italians hate each other is fading fast. (My block is mostly Italian, but the next group represented is Irish. No one cares, except when it comes to the battle of "What's for dinner?" lol)

I think that one was caused by the waves of immigrants to our country. At first the Irish were on the low wrung of the ladder. Than the Italians came. So, naturally, the Irish took that to mean, pushing off that low wrung on the heads of the Italians, and the Italians see them as "no better than us." And a rivalry was born, until both groups were well off that bottom wrung and stopped caring, because they became Americans instead. At least, that's the history of my city and neighborhood. (Oddly enough, it was the Italians that settled this part of the city first.)
 
J

JustAnotherUser

Guest
#19
There's lots of Italians where I live as well as the Irish. For the most part, nobody cares, but I usually get some vibe from Italians, both American and immigrant. An Italian teacher (with the accent and all) I had one year in high school knew I was Irish and tried telling me as to how St. Patrick's Day came about during class on that day, so I was a bit upset over that. :p