Actually, a Jesuit Priest, Francisco Ribera, came up with the idea in a book on prophecy he wrote around 1585-1590.
Does it matter who came up with a certain idea? The question is, does it jive with Scripture?
Actually, a Jesuit Priest, Francisco Ribera, came up with the idea in a book on prophecy he wrote around 1585-1590.
The Great Tribulation is not for the Church. It was prophesied for Israel back in the Old Testament (Jacob's trouble et al). It is a time of refining of Israel. Now if you have swallowed the replacement pill, then naturally you are going to fit the Church in where Israel belongs.
Putting the Church or believers in Christ in the Great Tribulation has nothing to do with just the replacement theology.
Apostle Paul (2 Thessalonians 2:1-3) says the man of sin is revealed first before any gathering takes place.
Revelation 6:9, 7:9-14, 11:7, 12:17 all show believers in Christ getting killed during the tribulation or Great tribulation, especially the one I have in red.
For that day etc. is in italics and so is not in the original. All that is saying is that the man be revealed before Christ returns (with His saints).Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
(2Th 2:1-3)
To the end he may stablish your hearts unblameable in holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all his saints.
(1Th 3:13)
For that day etc. is in italics and so is not in the original. All that is saying is that the man be revealed before Christ returns (with His saints).
Not sure why you posted these..Revelation 6:9, 7:9-14, 11:7, 12:17 , they are those believers slain during the tribulation...not the Church.
Persecution even unto death is promised to us, but not the great wrath/tribulation which God will pour out in judgement on the earth.
Folks, there will be people born again during the tribulation, so yes some saints will experience some tribulation, but not the church which is taken away at the beginning of the rapture. That's why you also see saints in heaven who have come out of great tribulation.
Scripture plainly says that God has not reserved punishment for his children. You have to interpret scripture so that all verses are true, not just some verses.
For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words.
(1Th 4:16-18)
A post Trib rapture would state, "Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air, as the Lord descends to earth" (NOT)
because He will come back to earth...
And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.
(Zec 14:4)
It seems senseless to have a rapture after the Tribulation, because faster than we go up...we come down, in the twinkling of an eye...for what purpose?
Persecution is from the world not God! Why would God persecute the righteous?Scripture says we are not appointed to face God's wrath, it says nothing about escaping persecution !!!
Persecution is from the world not God! Why would God persecute the righteous?
Did you take time to read the link I posted? Will you even consider changing your mind when there is clear scripture to support a rapture of the church?
Does it matter who came up with a certain idea? The question is, does it jive with Scripture?
He comes back with the Saints clothed in fine linen.2 Thessalonians 2:1 says both the coming of the Lord "and" our gathering together with Him will not happen tell both the falling away and the man of sin revealed takes place first.
Believers in Christ are the Church, and Revelation 7:9-14 shows these believers getting killed during the GT and this group is so large that nobody could number them. They are not just Jews for it says they come from all nations !!!
Finally God's wrath is not the Great Tribulation, as that takes place at the end of the great tribulation, for most of the GT is the man of sin persecuting and killing both Jews and Christians.
There is a reason Daniel 12:11-12 mentions 1, 290 and 1, 335 days, because 1,260 days is given to the man of sin to rule and then the following 30 days and then the following 45 is for Armageddon and God's wrath.
This happens after the Bema Seat of Christ and the Marriage Supper of the Lamb.Revelation 19:8, 14 (KJV)
8 And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.
14 And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
you are rambling here. This is in reference to those who are still alive at the rapture compared to those who have already fallen asleep in Christ.We are pulled up so that God' wrath can be poured out at the end of the Great Tribulation, so that we will not face it as He clearly said we wouldn't.
Look closely at this passage you gave;
"Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air,
The question is remain from what, and the answer would be those who are still alive after the persecution of the man of sin has come into the world to seek out and kill Jews and Christians both.
We will "go up" to meet him as a welcoming party as he desends at his 2nd coming. Not the third or fourth time as pre tribs believe . Christ promised to come back in the second coming. Not pre tribSo we go up ↑ as Jesus comes down ↓ ?..and end up right back down?
This is describing a welcoming party. Just liks officials are welcomed to this dayFor the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words.
(1Th 4:16-18)
A post Trib rapture would state, "Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air, as the Lord descends to earth" (NOT)
because He will come back to earth...
And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.
(Zec 14:4)
It seems senseless to have a rapture after the Tribulation, because faster than we go up...we come down, in the twinkling of an eye...for what purpose?
When it comes to booksellers these days the topic is immaterial $$$$.My point was that people have been trying to slide in this idea of a Rapture for ages. The bookseller are finally making an obsession out of it.
He takes His Church in the rapture, but the angels gather the elect at His Coming to earth when He comes with us clothed in fine linen.We will "go up" to meet him as a welcoming party as he desends at his 2nd coming. Not the third or fourth time as pre tribs believe . Christ promised to come back in the second coming. Not pre trib
He comes back with the Saints clothed in fine linen.
This happens after the Bema Seat of Christ and the Marriage Supper of the Lamb.
I am with you on this. The rapture is an invention of two ministers in Scotland , who when heard of a young girls' (Margaret McDonald) story of a visitation by a spirit who gave her this information in the first place, ran with it and created a whole new religion based on this. No one will find any trace of rapture theory before 1830, it simply did not exist anywhere. For those interested in the origins of the rapture, I direct you to read "The incredible cover up" by Dave MacPherson, who wrote this documentary after tracing the origins from the U.S. to England, then to Scotland. This has all been recorded in church history. Many people hear of this by word of mouth and have no idea where and when it originated from as with so many other so called church doctrines that are not of God , nor Christ, but from the mouths of men.
No one will find any trace of rapture theory before 1830, it simply did not exist anywhere.