C
Cateau
Guest
Considering the satanic and gnostic backgrounds totalitarians found their principles on, I am led to believe that Adolf tried to recreate the garden of Eden. Which is something Hollywood has never once tried to explain in the history of its films, it only explains the start and end of human life not the divirsity of race.
Taking into account that all beings are existant before or after birth with blue eyes that do or don't become affected by melanin in the long haul, we can then assume from an evolutionary biologist's view that in the time when Earth was in it's Goldilocks state that one singular race of man existed; as would explain the shared language up until the Tower of Babylon by which point peoples had already spead to certain areas of the world during Pangea, after which seperated groups during the split which was when each evolved certain features to survive in the ambiants they inhabited after mankind left the garden of Eden.
I know It's the same conundrum as asking why arn't monkeys evolving into humans then? Or how come if I go live in another part of the world none of my features change? Earth was different then so much more extreme, today however if you take a polar bear and set it in a woodland enviornment it changes fur color to adapt, not because it got a tan. People who live in areas of low oxygen due to the hemispheres, as in Peru where villages stand on mountains, the people tend to be born shorter than average height. I myself am not saying we are all from one man and woman, i think Yah called all of them Adam and Eve who were of one race. That's not to say any of the options now. After watching Fallen Angles and the NWO I came to the conclusion that man devolved into cave men when they became enslaved by the fallen angles. We were at the top, Inca and Mayan stone art show case spaces travellers, and our existance with the dinosaurs. The pyramids were a great architectural feat and astronomy, botonomy and autonomy were at it's peak. Yet this all took place B.C. Did we possess what we have now then? Are we finding out what we knew then right now? I believe so. We must of been splicing the creatures we now call myths, we must of played god until He flooded the world and we ourselves were betrayed by they who pretend to be from His Kingdom.
Darwin's theory of evolution must actually be the devolution we had gone through ...minus the ape bit. Although you can't deny werewolf syndrome or mental handicapps when amalgamated looks like the case. Which would make the epsilom of Huxley's Brave New World look like today's scientist's thoughts of an inferior class or species of men ruled by a superman race. Yeah, thats the future predicted for mankind, split in two. We've been though it before and doing it again. Trying to create what we had before sin is recurring because deep down we know It's suppose to be that way but through warped philosophies and Kronos syndrom we suffer at the hands of megalomaniacs who work for a lower power.
Take a look at the pope, Yah is supposed to be ruler, he's knows this yet takes it upon himself to forgive sins because it's suppose to be that way. Yah is supposed to be here doing that but because the world's not in equilibrium, because He is not physically here again they systematically try to remake what should be and people fall for it, murdering millions, worshipping mortals, doing what has happened again and again. Repeating the cosmic battle here on Earth only gnostically speaking from a hermeneutic point the forced evils reflect the good that once was or should be. That's why I think Adolf did it, to blasphem what once was by trying to recreate it.
Taking into account that all beings are existant before or after birth with blue eyes that do or don't become affected by melanin in the long haul, we can then assume from an evolutionary biologist's view that in the time when Earth was in it's Goldilocks state that one singular race of man existed; as would explain the shared language up until the Tower of Babylon by which point peoples had already spead to certain areas of the world during Pangea, after which seperated groups during the split which was when each evolved certain features to survive in the ambiants they inhabited after mankind left the garden of Eden.
I know It's the same conundrum as asking why arn't monkeys evolving into humans then? Or how come if I go live in another part of the world none of my features change? Earth was different then so much more extreme, today however if you take a polar bear and set it in a woodland enviornment it changes fur color to adapt, not because it got a tan. People who live in areas of low oxygen due to the hemispheres, as in Peru where villages stand on mountains, the people tend to be born shorter than average height. I myself am not saying we are all from one man and woman, i think Yah called all of them Adam and Eve who were of one race. That's not to say any of the options now. After watching Fallen Angles and the NWO I came to the conclusion that man devolved into cave men when they became enslaved by the fallen angles. We were at the top, Inca and Mayan stone art show case spaces travellers, and our existance with the dinosaurs. The pyramids were a great architectural feat and astronomy, botonomy and autonomy were at it's peak. Yet this all took place B.C. Did we possess what we have now then? Are we finding out what we knew then right now? I believe so. We must of been splicing the creatures we now call myths, we must of played god until He flooded the world and we ourselves were betrayed by they who pretend to be from His Kingdom.
Darwin's theory of evolution must actually be the devolution we had gone through ...minus the ape bit. Although you can't deny werewolf syndrome or mental handicapps when amalgamated looks like the case. Which would make the epsilom of Huxley's Brave New World look like today's scientist's thoughts of an inferior class or species of men ruled by a superman race. Yeah, thats the future predicted for mankind, split in two. We've been though it before and doing it again. Trying to create what we had before sin is recurring because deep down we know It's suppose to be that way but through warped philosophies and Kronos syndrom we suffer at the hands of megalomaniacs who work for a lower power.
Take a look at the pope, Yah is supposed to be ruler, he's knows this yet takes it upon himself to forgive sins because it's suppose to be that way. Yah is supposed to be here doing that but because the world's not in equilibrium, because He is not physically here again they systematically try to remake what should be and people fall for it, murdering millions, worshipping mortals, doing what has happened again and again. Repeating the cosmic battle here on Earth only gnostically speaking from a hermeneutic point the forced evils reflect the good that once was or should be. That's why I think Adolf did it, to blasphem what once was by trying to recreate it.
