Is the Devil bound right now...?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Is Satan bound right now?


  • Total voters
    129
Sep 29, 2015
89
1
0

um, That was tyranny and murder in the name of God.

that was not the iron rod.

When jesus comes, He will judge with a rod. but he will judge righteous judgment. Not based on his will, but his fathers. He will still do his fathers will

You say all that because its written in the New Testament.
You are using the iron rod to debate the sense of what we are discussing.

If either of us says something that conflicts with scripture, the other will correct him.

See how this iron rod works?
 
Sep 29, 2015
89
1
0
Scripture doesn't work with you guy's. That is one of the characteristics of A-Millennialism is that they have been taught a pre-packaged interpretation for most every biblical topic and they ignore the literal context of Scripture. The examples are Scripture says, Satan will be bound for thousand years and you distort that making the thousand years mean something other than what it says. Scripture states that Satan will be bound in the Abyss, you say, the Abyss is not a real place. Scripture demonstrates that the binding of Satan takes place after Christ returns to the earth to end the age and you say, he already returned at the destruction of the temple and we are already living in the thousand years that isn't a real thousand years, but is unknown.

Therefore, it is a waste of time to continue to provide scripture when you don't take the literal meaning, but instead spiritualize it into something that you've been taught by false teachers. You, like Cassian are going to have to find out the truth the hard way, that is, by experiencing everything that you are not believing in, unfortunately.

The same 1000 years of the universal church saw Satan locked up.
Nakedness in dress, nudes in Art, people living without money flowing as the Mark of the beast, monasteries everywhere, with monks avoiding sexual promiscuity all support this historical event of the 1000 year church before the Reformation:

Rev. 20:4
And I saw thrones (of Universal Christian authority) and they, (the 144,000 monks of Catholic monasticism: [Rev14:4]), sat upon them (Christianity mandated as the ONLY legal religion in the Empire, in 380AD), and (theocratic) judgment was given unto them (in the days of Catholic Monasticism):
and I saw, (visions), the souls, (the spirit-like psyches), of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, (Old Testament and New), and which had not worshiped (by participation in the paganistic practices and sexual excesses fueling) the beast (of the Roman economic system which had been based upon selfish self-interest), neither his image(on his coinage), neither had received his mark (of ledgered accounts recorded) upon their foreheads, or in (wages in) their hands; and they lived (as angels in the minds of Christians who have followed, these beheaded saints, in the memories of congregations who worshipped in churches built upon the bones of their remains)...
.... and (they) reigned (in Monasticism) with Christ a thousand years, (from 54 AD upon the appearance of the Holy Comforter, until 1054 AD with the first Schism of Greek Orthodoxy).
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
Scripture states that Satan will be bound in the Abyss, you say, the Abyss is not a real place.
The very premise, the lexical definition, informs the reader that the Abyss refers to a 'prison for spirits'....so, of course, it is real...but it is spiritual...hence FOR spirits...

Come on....
 
Sep 29, 2015
89
1
0
That's interesting. Since revelation was written and given to the apostle John. After Jesus left this earth.

of course it is like a Hebrew prophesy, they were all written by the same God.

Its hard news to read here, for sure, since people have long thought Revelation was totally Christian, but the Jews have established the writing was and had been held by their own Essenes, most whom converted to Christianity after the crucifixion.
These men had had Revelation old enough to be in Hebrew at one time.

*...the apocalypse has become especially important to Jewish students since it has been discovered by Vischer (see bibliography) that the main apocalypse actually belongs to Jewish apocalyptic literature.
REVELATION (BOOK OF) - JewishEncyclopedia.com
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
Revelation informs the reader quite plainly that it was Jesus who bound The Devil.
Here is good example of how you interpret scripture: you say that "Revelation informs the reader quite plainly that it was Jesus who bound the devil" when that is not plain, for scripture states that an angel coming down out of heaven having the key to the Abyss is the one who binds Satan and not Jesus himself. So, you are already in error coming out of the gate!

As further proof, we were already informed, way back in Rev 1.18, that ONLY Jesus holds the ‘keys’ to the events in Revelation
And now you've already begun the second error regarding this interpretation, for regarding the key, scripture says the following:

"I am the Living One; I was dead, and now look, I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades."

According to the Scripture above, Jesus holds the keys of death and Hades, not the events in Revelation. Yes, he is in control of everything, but the verse above does not say what you said it does. Having the keys of death and Hades, means that he has authority over death and punishment and has nothing to do with the key to the Abyss, which I can see is where you are going with this. Do you see how you twist the Scriptures to fit your position?

here IS Jesus…and, as already seen in scripture, Jesus’ binds Satan at The Cross.


Scripture states that Christ defeated Satan, that is, he disarmed the power's of darkness by fulfilling the law and paying the penalty for our sins, but your error is interpreting that defeat and applying it to Satan's literal binding in the Abyss of Rev.20:1-3

Yet another in a steady stream of scriptures denouncing a literal ‘1k year reign’.


You have proved absolutely nothing! You're like magician with his wand. You twirl it a couple of times and then, Viola! See, not a literal thousand years and that with nothing to back up.

But....you take it literally, along with the abyss....so....to be consistent...what do you think that 'key' looks like.....is it a gigantic skeleton key, perhaps...rotflol....!


The above is another popular ploy with A-Millennialism and that is to pose the question as to the make up of the key. The answer is, what the key is made of, whether of substance or a spiritual key, it is irrelevant. It does not change the event of Satan being thrown into the Abyss. A-millennialist will say, oh since Satan is a spiritual being, then then a metal chain couldn't hold him and neither could a spiritual key hold, and therefore, it is symbolism and therefore there is not a literal binding. I tell you the truth, something is currently keeping the beast bound in the Abyss, for he is not able to come out until that angel opens the Abyss at the fifth trumpet and that with the same key that will be used to lock it back up.

Whatever kind of key it is, Scripture demonstrates that a key is required to open the Abyss at the fifth trumpet and a key is required to lock it back up.



 
Last edited:

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
Its hard news to read here, for sure, since people have long thought Revelation was totally Christian, but the Jews have established the writing was and had been held by their own Essenes, most whom converted to Christianity after the crucifixion.
These men had had Revelation old enough to be in Hebrew at one time.

*...the apocalypse has become especially important to Jewish students since it has been discovered by Vischer (see bibliography) that the main apocalypse actually belongs to Jewish apocalyptic literature.
REVELATION (BOOK OF) - JewishEncyclopedia.com
Which part of "Apokalupsis" don't you understand cupid? The word means something being revealed that was previously unknown because it was veiled. Therefore, how could the Jews have received it prior to John? The Jews had no information Regarding the information contained in the book of Revelation. John received it on the island of Patmos for the first time. Why don't you people get off the internet and try reading the word of God. Boy, Satan is having a heyday with all these false teachings on the internet!
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
The very premise, the lexical definition, informs the reader that the Abyss refers to a 'prison for spirits'....so, of course, it is real...but it is spiritual...hence FOR spirits...

Come on....
Do you believe that nothing is impossible for God? Why would it be so hard to imagine that God has some type of spiritual force-field under the earth to keep spiritual beings from passing through the earth? Obviously there is something that is restricting them from coming out at their leisure. Regardless though, it is irrelevant and that because the scripture says, that he is bound in the Abyss. You're using man's reasoning to circumvent the scripture.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
eternally-gratefull,

The news, the world. The scripture I have posted over and over.
Oh that's right, You do not hold scripture as your sole source of material.
based on your earlier comments you have no understanding what the phrase is even about respective of scripture. You have latched so strongly to man made theories and ideas that you cannot see scripture outside of those clouded lens. You are part of the sola scripturist milieu where men use scripture to develop their own ideas of what it might mean. You have a lot of competition when it comes to what scripture means.

It isn't any wonder that almost 85% of the poll voters do not even understand the topic since they believe that Christ still has not come and defeated Satan.

So, when you say that you have stated scripture your comments are quite irrelevant because they do not even address the topic.

You need to go back and read. Ample evidence has been given by many of is
Of course, your not seeking truth, and you would never change even if you heard truth, Because you trust men more than the word of God.
Have already found it. It is because I believe in Christ's promise and believe that the Holy Spirit has lived up to His word. You need to rely upon yourself and other men to develope your theories based on scripture, when the Holy Spirit has given us the whole of His revelation, including the meaning in the beginning.

Man has never had the authority to interpret scripture and historically, when men tried to impose their innovations upon scripture they failed every single time. Only where man has placed himself above the Holy Spirit do we get man made theories being passed as litigimate meaning of scripture. Yet the sola scripturist milieu is nothing but chaos, confusion and division with hundreds of interpretations on every theory known.

Premillennialism is but one, that even after 200 years it still has not reached a point of unity, hardly the Gospel once given. It is just man competing with other men as to who can come up with the best theory.

You are welcome to to live in that confusion.
The fact that you have no evidence to present to refute the texts I posted but need to resort to these kinds of irrlevant, non substantive rhetoric says a lot.
 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
History must correspond with prophecies which have been fulfilled.
And we must see that the prophecies used in one matter are used again when the same symbolism and/or descriptions are stated again.

Fr instance, the seen head beast show u a number of times.
The description needs be used in the same way in all cases.

For Rev 20:4 we can see that Matthew 24:30 repeats the same historical events as the universal church formation during the Dark Ages:

Matt. 24:30 And then, (hearlding the end of pagan astrological worship), shall appear (in the clouds, to Constantine and 10,000 soldiers: [As reported to us by the historian Eusibius]), the sign, (i.e. The Cross), of the Son of man in heaven, (ushering forth the new paradigm of monotheistic Hebrew Christianity): and then shall all the tribes of the earth (in the Western European Roman Empire) mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming, in the clouds of heaven (enveloping the universality of Christ's Church on earth, in the manifestation of Age of Monasticism): with (socio-political) power (in the establishment of Universal Mandatory Roman Christianity) and great glory (in mandatory Universal Christian worship throughout all the Roman World).

Just another theory. Who developed this theory and when?
I have never heard of it before and Christianity has never recorded such a view in the previous 2000 years.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,985
4,604
113
The same 1000 years of the universal church saw Satan locked up.
Nakedness in dress, nudes in Art, people living without money flowing as the Mark of the beast, monasteries everywhere, with monks avoiding sexual promiscuity all support this historical event of the 1000 year church before the Reformation:

Rev. 20:4
And I saw thrones (of Universal Christian authority) and they, (the 144,000 monks of Catholic monasticism: [Rev14:4]), sat upon them (Christianity mandated as the ONLY legal religion in the Empire, in 380AD), and (theocratic) judgment was given unto them (in the days of Catholic Monasticism):
and I saw, (visions), the souls, (the spirit-like psyches), of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, (Old Testament and New), and which had not worshiped (by participation in the paganistic practices and sexual excesses fueling) the beast (of the Roman economic system which had been based upon selfish self-interest), neither his image(on his coinage), neither had received his mark (of ledgered accounts recorded) upon their foreheads, or in (wages in) their hands; and they lived (as angels in the minds of Christians who have followed, these beheaded saints, in the memories of congregations who worshipped in churches built upon the bones of their remains)...
.... and (they) reigned (in Monasticism) with Christ a thousand years, (from 54 AD upon the appearance of the Holy Comforter, until 1054 AD with the first Schism of Greek Orthodoxy).
MY LOOK HOW YOU HAVE TO ADD WORDS TO THE BIBLE TO MAKE IT SAY WHAT YOU WANT IT TO SAY.

NOW look what it really says:

Isaiah 13:9-13 (NIV)
[SUP]9 [/SUP] See, the day of the LORD is coming --a cruel day, with wrath and fierce anger-- to make the land desolate and destroy the sinners within it .
[SUP]10 [/SUP] The stars of heaven and their constellations will not show their light. The rising sun will be darkened and the moon will not give its light.
[SUP]11 [/SUP] I will punish the world for its evil, the wicked for their sins. I will put an end to the arrogance of the haughty and will humble the pride of the ruthless.
[SUP]12 [/SUP] I will make man scarcer than pure gold, more rare than the gold of Ophir.
[SUP]13 [/SUP] Therefore I will make the heavens tremble; and the earth will shake from its place at the wrath of the LORD Almighty, in the day of his burning anger.
Mark 13:22-26 (NIV)
[SUP]22 [/SUP] For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform signs and miracles to deceive the elect--if that were possible.
[SUP]23 [/SUP] So be on your guard; I have told you everything ahead of time.

[SUP]24 [/SUP] "But
in those days, following that distress, "'the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light;
[SUP]25 [/SUP] the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.'

Joel 3:14-16 (NIV)
[SUP]14 [/SUP] Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision! For the day of the LORD is near in the valley of decision.
[SUP]15 [/SUP] The sun and moon will be darkened, and the stars no longer shine.
[SUP]16 [/SUP] The LORD will roar from Zion and thunder from Jerusalem; the earth and the sky will tremble. But the LORD will be a refuge for his people, a stronghold for the people of Israel. [SUP]26 [/SUP] "At that time men will see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory.

Revelation 9:2 (NIV)
[SUP]2 [/SUP] When he opened the Abyss, smoke rose from it like the smoke from a gigantic furnace. The sun and sky were darkened by the smoke from the Abyss.

Revelation 6:12-17 (NIV)
[SUP]12 [/SUP] I watched as he opened the sixth seal. There was a great earthquake. The sun turned black like sackcloth made of goat hair, the whole moon turned blood red,
[SUP]13 [/SUP] and the stars in the sky fell to earth, as late figs drop from a fig tree when shaken by a strong wind.
[SUP]14 [/SUP] The sky receded like a scroll, rolling up, and every mountain and island was removed from its place.
[SUP]15 [/SUP] Then the kings of the earth, the princes, the generals, the rich, the mighty, and every slave and every free man hid in caves and among the rocks of the mountains.
[SUP]16 [/SUP] They called to the mountains and the rocks, "Fall on us and hide us from the face of him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb!
[SUP]17 [/SUP] For the great day of their wrath has come, and who can stand?"


THAT IS JUST ONE EVENT, AND THERE CERTAINLY ARE OTHERS, THAT PROVE YOUR WHOLE THEORY TO BE PURE FALSEHOOD. THAT DARKENING EVENT WILL LITERALLY HAPPEN, and has not already happened. EVERYTHING FROM REVELATION 5:1 THRU REVELATION 22:21 IS YET TO HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE.

What causes the Sun, Moon, and Stars to darken? Some say a Nuclear Winter; Some say it is a massive amount of ash in the upper atmosphere from NUMEROUS volcanoes exploding at the same time, but the Bible says it is smoke from the Abyss, which is where the worst of the demons are being held since the FLOOD of NOAH. GOD will open the abyss and turn those demons loose on the unbelievers of mankind.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Exactly! That is what I have been trying to get him and Bowman to understand, but because of the brain-washing of A-Millennialism, they are not willing to budge from that adopted teaching. So, I have shaken the dust of my feet as a testimony against them and they will have to find out the hard way by going through it, that is, if they will even recognize the events when they happen. I have spoken to this amil group many times and provided them with proof of chip implants under the skin being done and the say to me that it is ludicrous! As though it had nothing to do with prophesy. So, I'm thinking that they will ignore the plain truth of Scripture even while it is playing out right in front of their very eyes. A-Millennialism is one of the most deceptive false teachings there is. Very sad indeed!
I hate to use this example. I have many close friends who are amills, who I am sure will be in heaven with me,

Amil theology came about in the third century when the roman church, having to switch from a literal to a symbolic interpretation of scripture, to fit in all their pagan ritual, and fit their antisemitic theology,

Before that, it was never heard of.


Sadly some of the reformers brought this form of theology out with them.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
You say all that because its written in the New Testament.
You are using the iron rod to debate the sense of what we are discussing.

If either of us says something that conflicts with scripture, the other will correct him.

See how this iron rod works?
Nope. does not work that way, An iron rod is used to enforce righteous judgment,

We see through history that the bible has not done anything, but cause wars, and murder n the name of God that is not iron rod. That is evil
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Its hard news to read here, for sure, since people have long thought Revelation was totally Christian, but the Jews have established the writing was and had been held by their own Essenes, most whom converted to Christianity after the crucifixion.
These men had had Revelation old enough to be in Hebrew at one time.

*...the apocalypse has become especially important to Jewish students since it has been discovered by Vischer (see bibliography) that the main apocalypse actually belongs to Jewish apocalyptic literature.
REVELATION (BOOK OF) - JewishEncyclopedia.com
The jews do not even consider daniel as prophetic scripture.

So you will have to have more proof than this.


And revelation is considered the Daniel of the NT.

Again, Not only was the same God involved with OT prophesy and Revelation. But John (the writer of revelation) was hebrew.
.

so yes, it will have the same type of language, we should not be suprised.
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
deal with it...

Here is good example of how you interpret scripture: you say that "Revelation informs the reader quite plainly that it was Jesus who bound the devil" when that is not plain, for scripture states that an angel coming down out of heaven having the key to the Abyss is the one who binds Satan and not Jesus himself. So, you are already in error coming out of the gate!

If only you took time to study scripture.

Jesus in known by 30+ titles in the Book of Revelation, alone!

In fact, the same exact word rendered as 'angel' means 'messenger' as dictated by the context.

Jesus is clearly referred to as 'Messenger' outside of Revelation...


And you did not despise my trial in my flesh nor disdained it, but you received me as a Messenger (angel) of God, as Christ Jesus. (Gal 4.14)


Again, and again.....your assertions are completely and utterly without scriptural merit...
 
Last edited:
Feb 1, 2015
1,198
15
0
Minister of Information, They are not near Bagdad. Bowman, He's bound I tell you, bound. :)
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
Minister of Information, They are not near Bagdad. Bowman, He's bound I tell you, bound. :)
Hi passing_through! You're beating a dead horse (Avatar pun intended). Bowman and Cassian are going to have to find out the truth of this matter by experiencing it first hand. When they see that ruler make his seven year covenant, that should be an indicator to them that the seven years have begun with Christ returning at the end of that seven to end the age and to bind Satan in the Abyss for a literal thousand years.
 
Feb 1, 2015
1,198
15
0
Hi passing_through! You're beating a dead horse (Avatar pun intended). Bowman and Cassian are going to have to find out the truth of this matter by experiencing it first hand. When they see that ruler make his seven year covenant, that should be an indicator to them that the seven years have begun with Christ returning at the end of that seven to end the age and to bind Satan in the Abyss for a literal thousand years.
Nothing but the truth here. Thanks, happy to meet you.
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
Re: deal with it...

If only you took time to study scripture.


What you said above is a typical ploy in an attempt to discredit those who teaching the truth. Just because I don't hold to the same interpretation that you do does not mean that I have not studied, it just means that I have a different interpretation than you do.

Jesus in known by 30+ titles in the Book of Revelation, alone!


Yes, Jesus has different designations, but "an angel" is not one of them. John has already recognized Jesus as the Lord and as the Lamb, the rider on the white horse, as the King of kings and the Lord of lords and therefore since he has already seen Christ throughout the visions, John is not going to refer to him as "an angel". Not only that, but Jesus is already seen as the One riding on the white horse, so if anything John would identified him as the rider on the horse or as the Lamb and not as an angel. Furthermore, there is nothing in the Scripture that would allude to the that angel as being Christ. There is just not enough information to come to that conclusion. It would be pure conjecture to assign Christ as being that angel.

And you did not despise my trial in my flesh nor disdained it, but you received me as a Messenger (angel) of God, as Christ Jesus. (Gal 4.14)
Here is the actual verse:

"and even though my illness was a trial to you, you did not treat me with contempt or scorn. Instead, you welcomed me as if I were an angel of God, as if I were Christ Jesus himself. [/quote]

In the scripture above, Paul says, "you welcomed me as if I were an angel of God, as if I were Christ Jesus himself". So Paul is speaking about the Galatian's original love for him and his comparison mentions two examples of that love, one, "As if I were an angel of God" and two, "as if I were Christ Jesus himself." Two distinct persons, an angel of God and Christ! As usual, you are misinterpreting the scripture, for you are attempting to make Paul's reference to the angel as referring to Christ, yet they are two individual comparisons. Who needs to take time to study scripture?

Oh, how you people circumvent and twist the Scriptures to fit you personal position!



 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
Re: deal with it...



Yes, Jesus has different designations, but "an angel" is not one of them. John has already recognized Jesus as the Lord and as the Lamb, the rider on the white horse, as the King of kings and the Lord of lords and therefore since he has already seen Christ throughout the visions, John is not going to refer to him as "an angel". Not only that, but Jesus is already seen as the One riding on the white horse, so if anything John would identified him as the rider on the horse or as the Lamb and not as an angel. Furthermore, there is nothing in the Scripture that would allude to the that angel as being Christ. There is just not enough information to come to that conclusion. It would be pure conjecture to assign Christ as being that angel.

According to YOUR logic, then John the baptist MUST be an angel...

Mat 11.10 - 11

For this is the one about whom it has been written: "Behold, I send out My messenger (angelon) before Your face, who shall prepare Your way before You." Mal. 3:1 Truly I say to you, There has not arisen among those born of a woman any greater than John the Baptist. But the least in the kingdom of Heaven is greater than he is.



Mark 1.2 - 4

as it has been written in the Prophets, "Behold, I send My messenger (angelon) before Your face, who will prepare Your way before You; the voice of one crying in the wilderness. Prepare the way of the Lord, make His paths straight." Mal. 3:1; Isa. 40:3 John came baptizing in the wilderness and proclaiming a baptism of repentance for remission of sins.



Luke 7.27 - 28

This is he about whom it has been written: "Behold, I send My messenger (angelon)" before Your face, who "will prepare Your way before You." Mal. 3:1 For I say to you, Among those born of a woman, no prophet is greater than John the Baptist. But the least one in the kingdom of God is greater than he is.