Is Atheism a Religion?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Is Atheism a Religion?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 25 59.5%
  • No.

    Votes: 17 40.5%

  • Total voters
    42

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
#41
Oh, I take this to heart, too. The anti christ will be a god believing man (not the true living God), and he will go out to glorify this god, and through false miracles and lying wonders he will lead many people to follow this god.

Im sure that in the end there will still be atheist who are holding strong to their faith in what can be seen with the flesh, and say its all just swamp gas and mass hallucination :p But yeah, in all reality, everyone /knows/ theres a God. We all deal with God and spirits daily, theres just no denying it in the end. Its the whole reason atheist are filled with such passion, they work hard to convince themselves its not true :/
The AC will be declaring himself as god.

Anyhoo, I asked an atheist on one of these forums a year or two ago what would he do if by the sword he was told to convert to Islam, would he do it? His answer was 'yes' because 1. it would save his skin and 2. it would be a meaningless conversion since for him it would only be a charade.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
#42
I think that most would consider Buddhism as a religion. Funny about some of the topics "Scholars" debate about, though, lol.


God bless.
it may not be as clear-cut as it seems... one thing is the differences between, say, Tibetan buddhism with its focus on reincarnated Lamas and Zen with its denial of pretty much everything...
 
K

Kefa54

Guest
#43
By this definition. I would have to say that Atheism is not a religion.

One entry found for religion.[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Main Entry: re·li·gion

Pronunciation: ri-
lij-
n
Function: noun
1 a : the service and worship of God or the supernatural b : belief in or devotion to religious faith or observance c : the state of a person in the religious life <a nun in her 20th year of religion>
2 : a set or system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and ways of doing things
3 : a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held with faith and strong feeling
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,212
2,547
113
#44
I suppose one could say evolution is their common religion and if that is the case they have mega preachers :)
They may reject any kind of god but force and matter become their only alternative to eternal. What I mean is if no personal God created, their only alternative is to say matter is eternal...something can't come from nothing. So now they believe in an eternal entity.
Idk it kind sounds like we are trying to make a God out of something that isn't even for them. We could say science is their God or evolution or the big bang theory but a God is an entity a being of worship, they believe in science and evolution and the big bang theory but they simply strongly believe in it they don't go around giving praise to science or pray to it or believe it will save them. I believe in science as well I am fascinated by it and by everything that has to do with outer space but I don't worship it or anything. The eternal entity you speak of is something called the God particle, scientists have said it is a proven thing but in reality it isn't it has many major gaps and mysterious flaws.

The belief is that the God particle has always been around far before the big bang nothing created it it was just there, which is strange for scientists to believe because if we are speaking in scientific terms we live in a universe where nothing has ever come from nothing it always had to be created in some way and yet they believe this particle has always been there. So they believe a single particle has always existed never been created and it created all life and all of the universes but they refuse to believe an intelligent all powerful being did the very thing they are speaking of? If I ever was a scientist I would go on facts not theories that have never been proven, their view of proving such a thing is not on facts and they try to twist things to try to force the puzzle piece to fit in the puzzle but just doesn't quite work
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#45
Secular humanism is a religion. There is not much difference between atheism and secular humanism.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
#46
So I had an opportunity to review the thread, 'fanatical atheism' comes to mind in reference to becoming ordained ministers in the 'first church of atheism' which I find hilarious they use the term church; generally thou I think most atheists (nonbelievers) wouldn't attend those groups either because they want to control themselves!

Loved the reference to Star Wars, that was fantastic!! Oh here's something that clicked with me:

Moreover, the institution, a non-profit like traditional churches, does not have a doctrine and allows anyone, with any belief, creed, religion, or culture to attend. The only difference is that there is no mention of a Godly creation, Higher Power, Supreme Being, or idol for worship.

This was one of the statements for the 'first church of atheism'. How on Earth can you follow, or have rules, or laws when everyone would have their own opinions!?
Sadly this kind of mentality has crept into Modern Christendom, where people feel that Scripture is something that can mean one thing for one person, and something completely different to another.

The Church stands or falls on Doctrinal Purity. It is our job to bring out of Scripture what is in there, rather than make it what we want to mean. John MacArthur mentioned a preacher that said, "I have a great message, now...if I can only find a verse to fit it."

That is the typical approach of those who do not understand the necessity of approaching Scripture and finding it's intent for us. God has spoken to man, and it is our obligation to understand it as He spoke. And I think this is one of the things that bothers Atheists, there are parts of Scripture that they do not want to understand, and it is a bit of a vicious circle: they misunderstand the context, then base their hostility towards God and His Word on their own misunderstanding. I have yet to speak to an atheist that has a legitimate complaint about God and His Word. Most of their complaints are easily seen as contextual confusion, and are easily explained. But even explained, that does not mean this will lessen the atheist's enmity toward God. That doesn't mean we do not show them that error, and we trust God to do the work we cannot do, which is convict of sin, righteousness, and judgment.


[/QUOTE]
There's this book I began (began meaning I got through the first chapter and then it went flying into the garbage at warp speed!) reading 'God Is Not Good' by Christopher Hichens if I recall. His atheist negative book was so full of rage and arrogance it was preposterous that anyone could take it serious!! Frighteningly people do.
[/QUOTE]

Anger is a common thread in many atheists, but not all of them are like that. I have had some great discussions with atheists who have been very cordial. Once, on an Atheist Forum, one of the members was calling for me to be banned (which I think was because he wasn't able to walk all over me, lol, but perhaps that is delusions of grandeur? lol), and the atheist moderator told him I had just as much right to be there as anyone else, lol.

And this is one of the primary themes among atheists, which I suggest everyone pay careful attention to if they expect to minister to atheists: they take a position of moral superiority over the God of the Bible.

What I mean by that is their mentality is, "If God is 'good,' why does He allow bad things to happen to 'good' people?"

We know that the horrible things that take place in this world are a result of sin, and that all sin can be traced back to man, not God, but they have no understanding of sin and the curse upon this world, which man brought about. They think, "Why, if I were God, I wouldn't have killed all those people in the flood! I would have spared the children at least!"

But what they don't understand is that God in fact spared those children in the flood, who would have grown up and fell into the transgressions of their parents.

They ask, "Why doesn't God just make everything right?" But we know the only way that is possible...to destroy man from the face of the earth. God's mercy and grace is simply not understood by the natural man. So we have to consider their exaltation of themselves as morally superior to God, which is another example of a position based on ignorance.


[/QUOTE]
I was once reading this blog, a man was bashing Christians for not volunteering at the local Salvation Army and he professed he was atheist. Politely I told him that I doubt only atheists are volunteering at the Salvation Army; and I also informed him Salvation Army was founded by William Booth who was a Christian. The feed caught fire; and everyone like a cult tore down the positive influence of Christians!!! It was insane!!! Instead of generalizing everyone should volunteer, it's a part of humanity- it become solely the role of Christians to do more!?!?
[/QUOTE]

Truth seldom matters when it comes to the emotional responses of, not just atheists, but pretty much everyone. We can set truth to the side sometimes when we let emotions to rule, and forego self control. In a recent thread, someone I view as liberal in their views was defending homosexuals and bashing Christians. To listen to her...all Christians are hateful and treat homosexuals rotten. That is not the truth. While it is true some lose their temper in discussions with homosexuals, and treat them rotten, that doesn't mean every Christian does. One of the few "Forum Missionaries" I know has a specific ministry that seeks to help believers understand how to minister to gays, and he tries to raise awareness to the ugliness that can take place when those discussions come up.

But that doesn't mean we ignore the serious nature of sin, and while we can minister in a civil manner, we understand that any time we present an opposing view emotional response is the likely result.


[/QUOTE]

Approximately a year ago an atheist website made a graph that showed atheists donated more to charities; although it was debunked many still believed Christians spent all monies towards tithing or church funds. The graph showed only atheists donated to other organizations throughout United States not taking into account, that Christians donate to church AND charitable foundations. Unfortunately this is the type of garbage that is being pumped into the social media that people are feeding into.
[/QUOTE]

It is pretty much common knowledge that believers donate more than any other singular group in the world. Even secular media acknowledges that.

But we have to be careful about statistics and polls, because it doesn't matter the agenda, data can be manipulated, and is, by all sides. It is best that we keep it doctrinal, and in regards to atheists, this should be pretty easy, because for most of them their primary problems are going to be Biblical and their enmity is directed at Christians. The more militant among them are going to have a "gospel" that religion is the primary evil in this world, and their goal is to "save" people from religion itself.

As Christians...we have a similar goal, we too want to see people liberated from Religion and enter into Relationship with God on an eternal basis.



[/QUOTE]
Here's a current study in relation to donating :)

Atheism and charity - Conservapedia
[/QUOTE]

And we see again a reference to religion that is non-theistic:



A beggar in Cambodia. In Cambodia, the vast majority of the population adheres to a nontheistic form of Buddhism called the Theravada school of Buddhism.

A comprehensive study by
Harvard University professor Robert Putnam found that religious people are more charitable than their irreligious counterparts.[SUP][1][/SUP]


Atheists do their best to deny they are "religious," and some of them are not. But, we have only to look at the progressive organization of Atheists to see that they are quickly beginning to accept their place among religions, lol.

In England an "Atheist Church" was formed as a gag by a couple of comedians. They get together, sing, have a message, and fellowship.

But this isn't like what other religions do, is it? lol



[/QUOTE]
Anyway, I feel I've gotten slightly off topic. Atheism is a force that is building momentum because they can rapid fire there propaganda through social media within minutes. Instead of the populous researching it, they take it verbatim. How is it stopped when it's so feverish?


Many blessings!!! XooXoo

[/QUOTE]

I see everything you mention as right on topic.

I don't think people realize just how powerful this minority is. We are seeing laws change, and a general acceptance of immorality. I think it is safe to say that Atheists have a similar stranglehold on information which might be compared to the stranglehold the Catholic Church once had on knowledge of God.

And while I don't think that Atheism will ever exceed a certain percentage of the world's population, they are without question one of our greatest mission fields out there. How we are to be equipped to confront their error is to first be informed about them, and understand, that like any religious person, they have to be addressed on an individual basis. Again, they range from nominal to fanatic, like any other group. The more fanatical are going to be seen on Atheist Forums, and I have personally seen that they have "missionaries" who go to Christian Forums with the intent that is identical to mine when I go to Atheist Forums...to combat the Doctrinal Positions.

How we stop Atheism is one person at a time. And believe it or not, it is in our own ranks we can start. Many who profess to be Christians have bought into the propaganda and their compassion has turned to certain agendas of Atheism/Secular Humanism to the point where they turn on Christians. Some of these areas of liberal mindset would be the Homosexual Agenda, the "Women's Rights" Agenda, "Equal Rights" Agenda (and I am all for equal rights, just not for "special rights"), and the Agenda of Evolution.

So this is why I run this thread. One of the first things we can do for the atheist is show the irony of their hatred for Religion and the parallel of their own position and practice as very...religious.


God bless.
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
#47
My husband sold a canoe to a guy, and felt prompted to witness to him. Turned out the man was a rabid atheist and an atheist evangelist.

He demanded my husband's email, and started sending him all this atheist propaganda and trying to prove the bible was wrong and there was no God. It was a little over my husband's head, so he asked me to help.

I easily answered all his objections because I have heard them all before! He was preaching a very old atheist religion. So he would get madder and madder with every email, and started attacking me personally, (kind of like CC, but a bit worse! LOL)
His heart was so cold, and I simply could not feel God leading me to waste time debunking all his stupid arguments. So I just didn't reply. Kind of like the ignore button. (See, I have learned so much here!)

He wrote back a few more times, demanding I answer his 5 or so questions which would disprove Jesus forever. I had ignored those questions, they were so transparent and facile. But he kept demanding. Until he realized I was not going to answer his rhetoric anymore.

So definitely a religion. They all read the same books, come up with the same lines, and try to wear you down with nonsense. And no apparent signs that atheism is transforming them into better people. I think that was my last point, that God has changed me in ways I could not change myself. Too subjective for him, of course. But who knows, maybe I planted the seeds that God needed in that person's life, and I won't know till eternity how it comes out.

This type of Atheist is a prime target to introduce the concept of Atheism...as his religion. I cannot think of a topic that gets the attention of the more militant atheists than this one. They are very glad to play pong with statistics and data that has been manipulated, but, someone like this will probably tell you that "religion is harmful to man," and if you can point out that some of them are without question very religious themselves, it opens up their perspective to what they are doing, lol.

I owe a great deal to atheists, which might sound surprising, but it's true. It was only by getting into discussion and debate with them that I began to notice certain patterns among them. Another reason would be that when it came to scientific discussions, which many of them count as being in their favor, I began understanding how the data was incomplete and deceitful. An example would be in regards to fossil evidence, which they think proves evolution. They produced charts and data showing a supposed progression of evolution in man, and being a Bible Believer, my first line of attack is that man is according to Scripture in a downward spiral. Interestingly enough, because they tried to show an improvement in man as evidence of evolution, the Science did not actually support that...but supported my own view. I found scientific studies which showed, for example, that fossil evidence shows a decrease, not an increase, in cranial capacity. Most atheists think that man has gotten better, when in fact his cranial capacity has diminished (which explains why people watch the sitcoms on TV these days). And the data and statistics they presented themselves...showed that.

Found a quote where one scientist stated, "The average Neanderthal Woman would have whupped Arnold Schwarzenegger in an arm-wrestling contest."

And what we see in Scripture is not evolution, but devolution in man. Man once lived longer, for example. If it were not for medical technology, it is doubtful that the average life span would be 70-80 years.

Another area might be there objection to a Global Flood. It is humorous that some atheists deny the earth being covered in water, yet Science believes that is the case. We see, for example, much of North America covered in water at some point, called the Cretaceous Seaway.

When I first debating atheists on a scientific level, there was a nervousness, but, at this point, I look forward to it because I always learn something new. If we examine their "evidence" and take the study further, we can usually see how the data is either incomplete (which it typical of false teachers, they never include all relevant issues) or manipulated.

So again, I owe a lot to atheists, lol. I can't remember who said it, but it was stated "We can learn a lot from our antagonists." I believe that firmly, because what should happen is our antagonist should push us to study. To verify first our own position and them secondly to address theirs.

But debating atheists is never as rewarding, in my view, as debating with believers. I prefer more Scripture oriented discussions, and while we do debate Scripture with atheists at times, with believers that is usually the case.


God bless.
 
Feb 9, 2010
2,486
39
0
#48
I suppose that anything that has a viewpoint of reality,what is best for humanity to operate,whether peace,or war for the exaltation of their nation,and people,and such would be a religion,for it seems that whatever we believe and hold to would be a religion to us,for that is what we value in life,and believe.

But God said that there is a way that seems right to a person concerning reality,but the end thereof is death,if they are not in the truth of God.According to every person on earth,everybody has a viewpoint of reality,but only by being with God is the only reality.

I kind of look at religion as a belief,and practice,on what's best for mankind,and that is a good,and peaceful way,but the new age religion proclaim peace for the world,but that without peaceful measures if necessary,as well as many other groups,so I suppose religion is your viewpoint on reality,and what you practice,whether peace,or exalting yourself,according to the world,but to me religion is good,and peace.

Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world(James 1:27).

The God of Israel said that His word,and reality,is the only thing that can be called religion,and their religions is in vain.They can call it a religion if they want,but the world's viewpoint is not religion.There is only one religion,and that is God's word.

Religion is something that should represent goodness,and peace,and not fight,even if someone comes against you,but we do not need to fight,because God will handle those situations,and it is still His world,even when the beast kingdom comes about.The world has to fight for their so called religion,because there is no one to fight for them,including the atheists.

The only true religion is the word of God,because the saints are the only people on earth who will truly represent goodness,peace,and general good for mankind,without fighting and violence,because they do not have to fight,for God will handle the situation,and even if the world takes over the world,and defeats all the saints physically,and they are gone,God still owns the earth,and everything,and the kingdom shall be given to the saints,and God said the saints possess everything to be given them in due time,but the world has to fight for extension of their beliefs,but that is not religion but vanity,for they will not prosper,even if they appear to prosper.
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
#49
it may not be as clear-cut as it seems... one thing is the differences between, say, Tibetan buddhism with its focus on reincarnated Lamas and Zen with its denial of pretty much everything...
Sure, we could pick it apart, but, we still see a model for non-theistic religion.

Religious effort does not need to include God or gods. We understand that those who are religious in their efforts are not necessarily in relationship with God in reality, but that doesn't change the fact...they think they are.

The flip side would be that not being aware of religious effort doesn't change the fact that someone is inadvertently effecting religious effort which is in reality associated with God or gods.

The former would be akin to those who the Lord commends in Matthew 25. They ask, "When did we do these things," to which He responds "When you did it to the least of these My brethren ye did it unto me."

The latter would be those who think they do God service, but are in fact ministers of gods, namely Satan and his cohorts. Behind every idol I believe we will find a demon, the god who empowers certain religions. In the minds of the adherent they may feel they are legitimately serving God, but the reality is that Christ does not know them, there is no relationship between their efforts (i.e., prophesying, casting out demons, many wonderful works, et cetera) and Himself.

Now who among us would not view the efforts of Atheism as satanically inspired? And again, we have in view the religious among Atheists. But we can say that even the nominal atheist could not be excluded from the Religion itself, even if they do not claim affiliation with Organized Religion. Just like those who have trusted Christ but have not had opportunity to be affiliated with organized Christianity in some form or another.


God bless.
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
#50
By this definition. I would have to say that Atheism is not a religion.

One entry found for religion.[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Main Entry: re·li·gion

Pronunciation: ri-
lij-
n
Function: noun
1 a : the service and worship of God or the supernatural b : belief in or devotion to religious faith or observance c : the state of a person in the religious life <a nun in her 20th year of religion>
2 : a set or system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and ways of doing things
3 : a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held with faith and strong feeling
This is why I gave a more expanded definition of Religion early on. Atheists will also pull up a limited definition and try to exclude all relevant aspects of what a religion is.

The focus will be on point number 1, however, tell me if the following points are irrelevant to Atheism:


2 : a set or system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and ways of doing things
3 : a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held with faith and strong feeling


If we try to define "religious" as demanding a belief in God or gods, then perhaps we might accept that Atheism is not religious. But, just as we might say someone washes their car "religiously," religious effort is not confined to a sphere that demands belief in God or gods. There are numerous non-theistic religions.

One could start just about any sort of religion they chose, and regardless of whether there is a Supreme Being or not, file for tax exemption based on religious belief. So it is interesting that our society will recognize religion on a level of Law, but Atheists do not want the word attached to their efforts.

The reason is clear: they, like most religions, seek to distinguish themselves from all other religions.

The claim "We are not religious," though, is a lie. And if we can get that point across to them, it may make them give second thoughts to their beliefs and efforts.

As mentioned before, another point I see as critical would be understanding that Atheism is not a neutral position, it is a pro-active position that entails a belief system of it's own.

For example, ever run across an atheist that did not embrace evolution?

And while we would not make evolution exclusive to Atheism (there are Theistic Evolutionists), we do see a demand that atheists embrace evolution...for what other position could they take if they deny Creation?


God bless.
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
#51
Idk it kind sounds like we are trying to make a God out of something that isn't even for them. We could say science is their God or evolution or the big bang theory but a God is an entity a being of worship, they believe in science and evolution and the big bang theory but they simply strongly believe in it they don't go around giving praise to science or pray to it or believe it will save them.
Sure they praise Science. So do I, for that matter, lol. I am very pleased with anti-bacterial soap, for instance. I am very happy when Refrigeration Technology is properly working in my home.

But it goes beyond that: science is viewed by many as the "Savior" of mankind. Consider cancer...who is going to save people from this plague?

But a more relevant issue would be that Science is often offered up as "evidence" and "proof" that there is no God.

And in regards to the OP...we don't need to provide a god of Atheism to classify it as a Religion.


I believe in science as well I am fascinated by it and by everything that has to do with outer space but I don't worship it or anything.
But there are people who do. Their Teachers are the Scientists they hold in such high regard. If there is going to be salvation in any issue, it will be through their efforts.

Mankind is the Supreme Being of the Atheist.


The eternal entity you speak of is something called the God particle, scientists have said it is a proven thing but in reality it isn't it has many major gaps and mysterious flaws.
And we know, based on Scripture, something they are only beginning to scratch the surface of and acknowledge the possibility of: there is another dimension, the Spiritual Realm, which they can neither prove nor disprove.

Personally I think Science, if God allows the time, will come full circle to embracing an opposite view which it has presented so long: that there is that which exists which we cannot put under a microscope. The study of space is the opposite of the study at molecular level. We do not have a telescope that can see the big picture, though. Heaven is an existing sphere, which even if we could design a spaceship capable of unending flight, we could never reach it. At the same time, when released from the body we can be there instantaneously.

So Science is, and always has been, limited to only the data available. As that data increases, it is a necessity to change positions on issues.

Take turbidity, for instance. Study has recently forced Geologists to reverse their traditional teaching that sedimentary layering would take millions of years. They admit that sedimentary layering can not only occur in a few short years, but also in a few short...hours.

Heard about that in the media? Is it in the textbooks yet?



The belief is that the God particle has always been around far before the big bang nothing created it it was just there, which is strange for scientists to believe because if we are speaking in scientific terms we live in a universe where nothing has ever come from nothing it always had to be created in some way and yet they believe this particle has always been there.

And that is relevant to the physical universe. We as believers understand there is a reality of far more substance than this universe, which is but a shadow of the reality of God's Realm.


So they believe a single particle has always existed never been created and it created all life and all of the universes but they refuse to believe an intelligent all powerful being did the very thing they are speaking of?
So where did it come from? It is a simple fact that something cannot come from nothing, right?

We are at this time limited to the dimensions we can study, and as I said, I believe Science is beginning to theorize in a more supernatural direction.

However, I would also say that there is a general atmosphere of denial of the supernatural in the Scientific Community. Atheists will deny this and mock such a suggestion as a conspiracy theory. But it isn't unlike the stranglehold the Catholic Church once had on Christianity. If you wanted knowledge of God, you had to go through them. A fellow Priest of Martin Luther made the comment to him, "Do you know what would happen if the Word of God fell into the hands of the average plowboy?"

Well, history shows what would happen...liberty to have access to the Full Counsel of God's Word. And while this has also allowed false teachers to flourish, it still remains that the intentions of God in regards to His revelation to man have resulted in the Word of God being made more available to us plowboys, lol.


If I ever was a scientist I would go on facts not theories that have never been proven, their view of proving such a thing is not on facts and they try to twist things to try to force the puzzle piece to fit in the puzzle but just doesn't quite work
I think most scientists are sincere in their efforts, just as I believe most involved with religious groups are sincere. The primary problem is indoctrination. I can understand how someone who has grown up being inundated with evolution might gravitate toward an acceptance of evolution. Just as one growing up being taught that salvation can be lost if one's works are not good enough would embrace that view.

And it's when those who have an agenda which is hostile to the Word of God gain a platform that does not introduce opposing views that we see a stranglehold become effective.

So what do we do? I think our best route is to simply study Scripture. Science is an ever-changing collection of data, but, the Word of God has not changed. While we might be seen as sitting still, there is nothing wrong with that, if our knowledge is something that is unchanging. Let those hostile to God seek to debunk Scripture, they haven't yet, and they never will. Atheists get upset with me for saying...

...we are simply waiting for Science to catch up. lol


God bless.
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
#52
Sorry, I messed up the quoting, so wanted to redo this.

Goodness11 said:
Originally Posted by Goodness11
So I had an opportunity to review the thread, 'fanatical atheism' comes to mind in reference to becoming ordained ministers in the 'first church of atheism' which I find hilarious they use the term church; generally thou I think most atheists (nonbelievers) wouldn't attend those groups either because they want to control themselves!

Loved the reference to Star Wars, that was fantastic!! Oh here's something that clicked with me:

Moreover, the institution, a non-profit like traditional churches, does not have a doctrine and allows anyone, with any belief, creed, religion, or culture to attend. The only difference is that there is no mention of a Godly creation, Higher Power, Supreme Being, or idol for worship.

This was one of the statements for the 'first church of atheism'. How on Earth can you follow, or have rules, or laws when everyone would have their own opinions!?

Sadly this kind of mentality has crept into Modern Christendom, where people feel that Scripture is something that can mean one thing for one person, and something completely different to another.

The Church stands or falls on Doctrinal Purity. It is our job to bring out of Scripture what is in there, rather than make it what we want to mean. John MacArthur mentioned a preacher that said, "I have a great message, now...if I can only find a verse to fit it."

That is the typical approach of those who do not understand the necessity of approaching Scripture and finding it's intent for us. God has spoken to man, and it is our obligation to understand it as He spoke. And I think this is one of the things that bothers Atheists, there are parts of Scripture that they do not want to understand, and it is a bit of a vicious circle: they misunderstand the context, then base their hostility towards God and His Word on their own misunderstanding. I have yet to speak to an atheist that has a legitimate complaint about God and His Word. Most of their complaints are easily seen as contextual confusion, and are easily explained. But even explained, that does not mean this will lessen the atheist's enmity toward God. That doesn't mean we do not show them that error, and we trust God to do the work we cannot do, which is convict of sin, righteousness, and judgment.


There's this book I began (began meaning I got through the first chapter and then it went flying into the garbage at warp speed!) reading 'God Is Not Good' by Christopher Hichens if I recall. His atheist negative book was so full of rage and arrogance it was preposterous that anyone could take it serious!! Frighteningly people do.
Anger is a common thread in many atheists, but not all of them are like that. I have had some great discussions with atheists who have been very cordial. Once, on an Atheist Forum, one of the members was calling for me to be banned (which I think was because he wasn't able to walk all over me, lol, but perhaps that is delusions of grandeur? lol), and the atheist moderator told him I had just as much right to be there as anyone else, lol.

And this is one of the primary themes among atheists, which I suggest everyone pay careful attention to if they expect to minister to atheists: they take a position of moral superiority over the God of the Bible.

What I mean by that is their mentality is, "If God is 'good,' why does He allow bad things to happen to 'good' people?"

We know that the horrible things that take place in this world are a result of sin, and that all sin can be traced back to man, not God, but they have no understanding of sin and the curse upon this world, which man brought about. They think, "Why, if I were God, I wouldn't have killed all those people in the flood! I would have spared the children at least!"

But what they don't understand is that God in fact spared those children in the flood, who would have grown up and fell into the transgressions of their parents.

They ask, "Why doesn't God just make everything right?" But we know the only way that is possible...to destroy man from the face of the earth. God's mercy and grace is simply not understood by the natural man. So we have to consider their exaltation of themselves as morally superior to God, which is another example of a position based on ignorance.


I was once reading this blog, a man was bashing Christians for not volunteering at the local Salvation Army and he professed he was atheist. Politely I told him that I doubt only atheists are volunteering at the Salvation Army; and I also informed him Salvation Army was founded by William Booth who was a Christian. The feed caught fire; and everyone like a cult tore down the positive influence of Christians!!! It was insane!!! Instead of generalizing everyone should volunteer, it's a part of humanity- it become solely the role of Christians to do more!?!?
Truth seldom matters when it comes to the emotional responses of, not just atheists, but pretty much everyone. We can set truth to the side sometimes when we let emotions to rule, and forego self control. In a recent thread, someone I view as liberal in their views was defending homosexuals and bashing Christians. To listen to her...all Christians are hateful and treat homosexuals rotten. That is not the truth. While it is true some lose their temper in discussions with homosexuals, and treat them rotten, that doesn't mean every Christian does. One of the few "Forum Missionaries" I know has a specific ministry that seeks to help believers understand how to minister to gays, and he tries to raise awareness to the ugliness that can take place when those discussions come up.

But that doesn't mean we ignore the serious nature of sin, and while we can minister in a civil manner, we understand that any time we present an opposing view emotional response is the likely result.


Approximately a year ago an atheist website made a graph that showed atheists donated more to charities; although it was debunked many still believed Christians spent all monies towards tithing or church funds. The graph showed only atheists donated to other organizations throughout United States not taking into account, that Christians donate to church AND charitable foundations. Unfortunately this is the type of garbage that is being pumped into the social media that people are feeding into.
It is pretty much common knowledge that believers donate more than any other singular group in the world. Even secular media acknowledges that.

But we have to be careful about statistics and polls, because it doesn't matter the agenda, data can be manipulated, and is, by all sides. It is best that we keep it doctrinal, and in regards to atheists, this should be pretty easy, because for most of them their primary problems are going to be Biblical and their enmity is directed at Christians. The more militant among them are going to have a "gospel" that religion is the primary evil in this world, and their goal is to "save" people from religion itself.

As Christians...we have a similar goal, we too want to see people liberated from Religion and enter into Relationship with God on an eternal basis.



Here's a current study in relation to donating :)

Atheism and charity - Conservapedia
And we see again a reference to religion that is non-theistic:



A beggar in Cambodia. In Cambodia, the vast majority of the population adheres to a nontheistic form of Buddhism called the Theravada school of Buddhism.

A comprehensive study by
Harvard University professor Robert Putnam found that religious people are more charitable than their irreligious counterparts.[SUP][1][/SUP]


Atheists do their best to deny they are "religious," and some of them are not. But, we have only to look at the progressive organization of Atheists to see that they are quickly beginning to accept their place among religions, lol.

In England an "Atheist Church" was formed as a gag by a couple of comedians. They get together, sing, have a message, and fellowship.

But this isn't like what other religions do, is it? lol



Anyway, I feel I've gotten slightly off topic. Atheism is a force that is building momentum because they can rapid fire there propaganda through social media within minutes. Instead of the populous researching it, they take it verbatim. How is it stopped when it's so feverish?


Many blessings!!! XooXoo
I see everything you mention as right on topic.

I don't think people realize just how powerful this minority is. We are seeing laws change, and a general acceptance of immorality. I think it is safe to say that Atheists have a similar stranglehold on information which might be compared to the stranglehold the Catholic Church once had on knowledge of God.

And while I don't think that Atheism will ever exceed a certain percentage of the world's population, they are without question one of our greatest mission fields out there. How we are to be equipped to confront their error is to first be informed about them, and understand, that like any religious person, they have to be addressed on an individual basis. Again, they range from nominal to fanatic, like any other group. The more fanatical are going to be seen on Atheist Forums, and I have personally seen that they have "missionaries" who go to Christian Forums with the intent that is identical to mine when I go to Atheist Forums...to combat the Doctrinal Positions.

How we stop Atheism is one person at a time. And believe it or not, it is in our own ranks we can start. Many who profess to be Christians have bought into the propaganda and their compassion has turned to certain agendas of Atheism/Secular Humanism to the point where they turn on Christians. Some of these areas of liberal mindset would be the Homosexual Agenda, the "Women's Rights" Agenda, "Equal Rights" Agenda (and I am all for equal rights, just not for "special rights"), and the Agenda of Evolution.

So this is why I run this thread. One of the first things we can do for the atheist is show the irony of their hatred for Religion and the parallel of their own position and practice as very...religious.


God bless.
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
#53
I suppose that anything that has a viewpoint of reality,what is best for humanity to operate,whether peace,or war for the exaltation of their nation,and people,and such would be a religion,for it seems that whatever we believe and hold to would be a religion to us,for that is what we value in life,and believe.

But God said that there is a way that seems right to a person concerning reality,but the end thereof is death,if they are not in the truth of God.According to every person on earth,everybody has a viewpoint of reality,but only by being with God is the only reality.

I kind of look at religion as a belief,and practice,on what's best for mankind,and that is a good,and peaceful way,but the new age religion proclaim peace for the world,but that without peaceful measures if necessary,as well as many other groups,so I suppose religion is your viewpoint on reality,and what you practice,whether peace,or exalting yourself,according to the world,but to me religion is good,and peace.

Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world(James 1:27).

The God of Israel said that His word,and reality,is the only thing that can be called religion,and their religions is in vain.They can call it a religion if they want,but the world's viewpoint is not religion.There is only one religion,and that is God's word.

Religion is something that should represent goodness,and peace,and not fight,even if someone comes against you,but we do not need to fight,because God will handle those situations,and it is still His world,even when the beast kingdom comes about.The world has to fight for their so called religion,because there is no one to fight for them,including the atheists.

The only true religion is the word of God,because the saints are the only people on earth who will truly represent goodness,peace,and general good for mankind,without fighting and violence,because they do not have to fight,for God will handle the situation,and even if the world takes over the world,and defeats all the saints physically,and they are gone,God still owns the earth,and everything,and the kingdom shall be given to the saints,and God said the saints possess everything to be given them in due time,but the world has to fight for extension of their beliefs,but that is not religion but vanity,for they will not prosper,even if they appear to prosper.
The only thing I would mention is that because there is a caricature of atheists in the minds of many, they do not recognize that not all atheists are bereft of good works on a temporal level. There are a number of humanitarian efforts that most of us would approve of.

But you make a good point:

I kind of look at religion as a belief,and practice,on what's best for mankind

In the minds of many atheists they feel that their beliefs are what is best for mankind. They vary in how they present their beliefs, and their efforts are varied, but, in their minds, they feel they are supporting something that will help mankind.


God bless.
 

Yeraza_Bats

Senior Member
Dec 11, 2014
3,632
175
63
36
#54
The AC will be declaring himself as god.

Anyhoo, I asked an atheist on one of these forums a year or two ago what would he do if by the sword he was told to convert to Islam, would he do it? His answer was 'yes' because 1. it would save his skin and 2. it would be a meaningless conversion since for him it would only be a charade.

Read Daniel 11: 38 and 39. He follows a god of war, and glorifies the strange god.

I take the verses about him making himself god to be him doing what Christ did, mocking the promised Messiah, in order to deceive people away from the One who came to save them, and put them into idolatry. But he will be one with a false, non existent god.
 
K

Kefa54

Guest
#55
Secular humanism is a comprehensive, nonreligious life-stance incorporating: A naturalistic philosophy. A cosmic outlook rooted in science. A consequentialist ethical system.

https://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php/3260


Kefa


Secular humanism is a religion. There is not much difference between atheism and secular humanism.


For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

Yeraza_Bats

Senior Member
Dec 11, 2014
3,632
175
63
36
#56
I could honestly like care less what the earth calls "religion" :p

Atheist are putting all their faith into what can be seen through the flesh alone, and into what they can understand and make themselves, all with with WITHOUT actual proof that there is nothing more at work than non-stop unbelievable coincidences over and over again :p

Its definitely being faithful to what you can see, while holding strong to the idea that existence randomly happened on its own with no motivation at all :p And they will fight to the death to it too. All the other man made rules on what qualifies as religious are meaningless to me :p

EDIT: Theyre faithful to their teachers as well, putting faith in their message that they dont need to worry.

I think Richard Dawkins (or whatever his name is) actually has a book called "There is no god, so enjoy your life".
 
B

biblicalsandy

Guest
#57
To me there is a link about atheism in Revelation, when we are being spoken to about the seven churches. To me the seven churches are of the spiritual nature, the souls condition and the relationship Jesus says we have with him! It is just not mentioned as atheism..I could be wrong, but this is what I gained from it..Just sharing! If anyone feels I have been misled, please privately message me..Thank you
 
Jan 7, 2015
6,057
78
0
#58
Atheism is a religion because it does worship a god even though they might not know it.

The definition of religion is...... "the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods:"


Definition of Atheism is...... "disbelief in the existence of God or gods."

Which we know is false because we know God's words are Truth. These scriptures will prove even Atheism is a religion by definition because they do worship a god. Keep in mind the Dragon, Satan, the Old Serpent, the Prince of this world is also known in scripture as the god of this world.

2 Corinthians 4:3-4 "But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: [SUP]4 [/SUP]In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them."

And we also know by the words of Truth that the whole world worships the Dragon, Devil, Satan, aka "the god of this world" as seen here in Revelation 13:3-4 "......: and all the world wondered after the beast.[SUP]4 [/SUP]And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?"

Anyone who does the will of their father the Devil (including Atheists) worships the Dragon, or "the god of this world"

So according to the words of God, even Atheists worship the god of this world.
 
Oct 30, 2015
22
0
0
#59
Typing in all caps is considered yelling online. If it's an issue of being able to see more easily your browser should have an option to increase text size.
MY GOD, YOU ARE UGLY! GOOD USER NAME. SHOWING ME THAT U DIDNT EVEN COMMENT ON MY TEXT SHOWS ME YOU DIDNT HAVE ANY RESPONSE MAYBE BECAUSE I OFFENDED U, BEING AN ATHEIST?
 

cavil51

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2012
147
3
18
#60
Yes. At least according to the Federal Courts.
[h=1]
Federal Court Rules ‘Secular Humanism’ a Religion, Extends Equal Protection Rights to Atheists
[/h]http://christiannews.net/2014/11/04/federal-court-rules-secular-humanism-a-religion-extends-equal-protection-rights-to-atheists/