LOL. Are you trying to be funny? That did make me laugh. There are none righteous, Lance. That is Scriptural. So according to your line of logic or reasoning, none will be inheriting the kingdom of God.You calling me unrighteous?
LOL. Are you trying to be funny? That did make me laugh. There are none righteous, Lance. That is Scriptural. So according to your line of logic or reasoning, none will be inheriting the kingdom of God.You calling me unrighteous?
It is God's standard not ours.
well those passages (especially 2:1) would count anyone out of being righteous.
LOL. Are you trying to be funny? That did make me laugh. There are none righteous, Lance. That is Scriptural. So according to your line of logic or reasoning, none will be inheriting the kingdom of God.
This was a thread on Homosexuals so that is why I used that example. I wasn't excluding any of the others on purpose.
All righty thenI fully know that, just asking the question
I know you are.. I think we were trying to point out that the homosexual is no more righteous or less righteous than you are. When it comes to Gods standard, everyone of us fall short.
So who is it that inherits the kingdom of God? Who is righteous enough to do that?
Never once did I say they were less righteous than me? Please point out where I said that?
Please provide the Scriptures that show simply being gay is a sin. Not those that say acting on it, giving up their natural desires, being given over to their lusts etc. Just the plain and simple fact of being gay, show with Scripture how it is a sin. Thanks!
I am not trying to get into it, You asked her if she tried to say you were unrighteous. I was trying to explain..
Unrighteousness will not inherit the kingdom of God is the question. so who can inherit it if we are all unrighteous?
I think that is the point that was being made
If you knew you were unrighteous, why then did you ask it. I am as confused as she obviously was, since your now saying you understood that.
I am not confused.If you knew you were unrighteous, why then did you ask it. I am as confused as she obviously was, since your now saying you understood that.
Never said I didn't understand it. I just wanted her to say it instead of beating around the bush. You are assuming so basically you confused yourself.
Say what? That being gay in and of itself is not a sin? How many times do I need to say it? You may as well say that being human in and of itself is a sin.Never said I didn't understand it. I just wanted her to say it instead of beating around the bush. You are assuming so basically you confused yourself.
lol. I never took what she said to mean you were unrighteous, she was just stating a fact.
So to us, it seemed you took offense. So I am not sure what the issue is, it seems your the one upset..
Your the one who brought the passage up (romans 1), W know those who practice sin will not inherit the kingdom. But who will. thats the point she was trying to make. What makes you different from them. Your not more perfect (righteous) so what is it that separates you from them?
Say what? That being gay in and of itself is not a sin? How many times do I need to say it? You may as well say that being human in and of itself is a sin.
Any Scriptures yet to say that being gay in and of itself is a sin? I am waiting... I do not need articles and deflections and rationalizations. I see enough (too much!) of that around here!We have never taught that we should get as close to sin as we can without actually committing the act. Thats dangerous and the Bible doesn't teach that concept. As this article on homosexual celibacy points out...
You play the blame game? Not nice. I gave Scripture back to you. The very one you provided. Being gay is not a sin. Are you in agreement with that, then?I think I'm bowing out of this thread since two people here want to cause issues with me over something I never said. God bless all and Love ya