Re: Do you believe Jesus (God in the flesh) appeared to mankind before the "Virgin Bi
well NazeriteNation here is the predicament I do not know haha though if I noticed some thing of the sort would we be labled heratic? hahaha
there are scriptures in the old testament wich might bring up this question and I think its a really good one but also one wich I dont think I could ever really come to any conclusion on.
In Genesis 18 the Lord apears to Abraham, it says he looked up and saw 3 men, (this passage is also used as references to the trinity doctrine) it says when he saw them he hurried from the entrance of his tent to meet them (the three men) and bowed low to the ground and said if I have found favour in your eyes lord (footnote- O Lord) now these are 3 men that is pointed out at the 2nd verse and also pointed out that there feet washed and had food given to them, so it is clear that they arent just an aperation but they are clearly portrayed as flesh (see 18:4-5) it is also clear that these three can be portrayed and is believed by manny to be the Lord as the chapter adresses Lord over and over. ok we see three men to begin with some say all three are the Lord some say they are the Lord and two angels another is that some say that the referance to angels in some places is aslo referance to the Lord but the 3 verses in this chapter and the 1st verse of chapter 19 are the aparently the key (gen 18:2-3 ; 18:22 ; 19:1)
there is also the instance of Jacob wrestling with God, Gen 32:22-32, here it says that Jacob wrestled with a man but it also sais that this man was the Lord here Jacob says "it is because I saw God face to face and yet my life was spared"
then there is the subject of Melchizadek witch I seen people talking about this in one of the other threads, the concept comes from Hebrews when it makes referance to Jesus christ being the Highpriest, Melchezidek being the type and christ being the antitype (the actual) we can see why some might point to Melchezidek actualy being Jesus in the flesh in Abrahams day but the argument is not realy backed up and is a little bit flimzy, notice this is a type (typology) is is also mentioned of as Aaron the first high priest of the levitical priesthood and all other high priests of hid sucsesion, Adam, the bernt offerings, Bullock, calf, david king of Israel, eagles, Isaac, Jacob, lamb, lion, manna, ox, Solomon, sparrow, star, sun, Turtle dove, these are all types of christ but are not the actual antitype being Jesus the actual thing for witch they reprasent.
then you have another example in Daniel 3:24-26 the argument here as christ being in the flesh dosnt stand verry well either but there is no doubt that this 4th man could be identafied as the son of God (Jesus christ)