Thanks, you just proved my point, and showed that I was correct in what I said,
End of story. You reject the literal interpretation of the word. WHich proves the man of sin, the world leader at the end of this age, the son of perdition, the one who will rule the natural world go to war against the saints, and will personally be destroyed by Jesus and cast to hell at his return, is a real person, (who many call antichrist) and not just a spirit..
No, You are the one who has proven yourself to be in error..
Your also bearing false witness, so your also the liar.
End of story. You reject the literal interpretation of the word. WHich proves the man of sin, the world leader at the end of this age, the son of perdition, the one who will rule the natural world go to war against the saints, and will personally be destroyed by Jesus and cast to hell at his return, is a real person, (who many call antichrist) and not just a spirit..
No, You are the one who has proven yourself to be in error..
Your also bearing false witness, so your also the liar.
And so now your imaginary flesh and blood man figure is called the "man of sin". Well I also already showed by scripture in post #20 that Paul was not talking about a single individual man but a whole wicked generation that has "that Wicked" spirit working "in" them, as Jesus also confirmed in the parable of "that man".
So by the words of God I have proven not only that antichrist is a spirit working in many deceivers and has already come into the world. But also the mystery of the "man of sin" is speaking of a whole wicked generation that is going into destruction.
But all you have done is run off at the mouth not proving "Antichrist" is a single flesh and blood man that is yet to come in the future, nor do you even understand what Paul was talking about when he referred to the "man of sin" and "that Wicked" and the "mystery of iniquity" working "in them" "they" and "they all" who have rejected the Truth.
Your nothing more than a false accuser, liar, and a deceiver. BYE!