What that means is there is no evidence that anyone before Prince taught this.
Uh..... That book you deride was only written 6 years ago. That's less than 2,200 days ago.
What that means is there is no evidence that anyone before Prince taught this.
Uh..... That book you deride was only written 6 years ago. That's less than 2,200 days ago.
Yes, that stupid teaching is very young. What's your point?
I find it interesting Joseph Prince WOF, prosperity and hyper grace preacher maybe like others suggesting 1 John was written about gnostics or a certain type of belief system. I am sure you will find others who have thought this, like hyper grace is another version of gnosticism is an arguable position.
The thing with theology is it does not care about what you believe it defines the basic structures of belief.
Ofcourse the believers think it is the only way to believe and will change all other belief systems so that theirs appears the ultimate solution. It does not change the basic tenants of faith of a position, no matter how much the believers want it otherwise.
Jesus was called a blasphemer, a sinner, someone who broke the law because he eat with sinners and tax collectors. Now from the pharisees point of view they were correct, except they claimed they spoke from Moses and the law.
Now I am happy if people want to argue their position, as long as they are open about what it actually is, and are prepared to answer the problems with it. It may sound picky, but ones whole salvation can depend upon the conclusions. It is why people have descended into war with each other in the past, which is definately not a good way to resolve differences.
JGIG has already told you. If I repeated it, you still wouldn't get it.
You don't really read what we post, do you . . . SMH
-JGIG
It really is quite amazing to watch that level of denial in action, isn't it?
-JGIG
The term "Hyper-Gracers" is a new label that is kinda cool in that...it would be so awesome if all true CHRIST followers were to get so excited over Him that the world would begin to see that Christians are not as dull, stupid, clannish and boring as the world thinks we are. Rare is the day when we see Christians truely exuberant and filled with His Holy Spirit that we can no longer just warm a pew during designated worship services. IT's about time we showed excitement and energy, being in one accord while praising and worshiping JESUS CHRIST.
There's no evidence for this. It's completely made up to undergird the falsehoods of new.modern.hyper grace.
John was teaching believers of spiritual truths they had learned from Jesus so that they wouldn't sin. That is the context of 1 John 1.
Uh..... That book you deride was only written 6 years ago. That's less than 2,200 days ago.
You don't really read what we post, do you . . . SMH
-JGIG
D.I.Y. holiness
Practical holiness is a term to beware of as it often comes hiding a fishhook. Much of it is pure mixture, as the following soundbites illustrate:
- “Following Christ is a lifestyle.” (True.) “We’ve got to keep His commands to be His disciples.” (Nope – that’s backwards. That’s putting the fruit before the tree.)
- “Find out what pleases the Lord.” (Okay!) “Keeping His instructions pleases Him.” (No it does not – that’s faithless, law-based living that nullifies grace and inflames sin – read Romans 7. Jesus pleases the Lord. Trust Him.)
- “If you sow to the flesh you will reap destruction.” (Yep). “So we have to be earnest in getting people to change their behavior.” (But that’s sowing to the flesh! You’re setting them up for failure.)
Holiness preaching that emphasizes what you must do is carnal Christianity. Make no mistake, it comes straight out of the old covenant. Heed this sort of teaching and you will exalt the flesh at the expense of grace. And it won’t make you holy.
There are at least four ways to determine whether the holiness message you’re listening to reflects the condemning covenant of the law or the new and liberating covenant of grace:
Old covenant holiness is based on who you are (a bit of a reprobate) and is sold as a list of things you must do; new covenant holiness is based on who Christ is (our holiness – 1 Cor 1:30) and what He has done (sanctified you – Heb 2:11, Rom 11:16)
.
Old covenant holiness emphasizes sacrifices you are expected to make; new covenant holiness emphasizes the perfectly perfect sacrifice of the Lamb, by which you were “perfected forever” (Heb 10:14).
Old covenant holiness is sold as a process of increasing sanctification – something “we grow into” as we become more like Christ; new covenant holiness is presented as a done deal (Heb 10:10) in our new creation and we walk out who we already our in Christ now.
Old covenant holiness comes with a big stick – “the Lord will condemn you if you don’t deliver”; new covenant holiness has exhortations but no sticks because there is no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus (Rom 8:1).
Ok...how do we walk out this holiness stuff then?
To be holy is to partake of His wholeness; it is to stop acting broken (because in Him we are not broken) and to allow Him to express His whole and beautiful life through us.
The challenge is that being holy is a new experience for us. As sinners, holiness was totally alien to us. That old lifestyle was characterized by brokenness and hurt. Now that we are in Him we have to learn to walk in our new and God-given identity.
The wrong way to approach this is to think of yourself as a flawed sinner trying to become holy. That’s not who you are and that’s not how it works. Instead, see yourself as a toddler learning to walk. Just as you wouldn’t spank an infant if they stumbled and fell, neither will your heavenly Father spank you. He doesn’t condemn you when you fall; He encourages you to get up and walk!
He has given you everything you need for life and godliness. In Christ you lack nothing. You just need to work out who you already are and what He has already given you. This is the adventure of holy living.
Amen!..well said...people can talk about "doctrine" all day...but do they ever talk about Jesus?..That knowing He is our life! Do they lead you to Him..or to our own works?
Man--made religion no matter how good in "appearance " it is .....it pales in comparison to knowing and trusting is Jesus only.
JGIG - I have to say, I am not going to read all the stuff you write to come to the basic point I am right.
You like Ryan Rufus. Now I can gloss up the message in lots of fluff, but when push comes to shove, either sin is the problem in the world or it is not.
If you think the problem is faith in Jesus, goodbye.
There is nothing else to say. You are an empty wind bag.
Most people have no clue who Jesus is or what he represents, and still they sin. Sin happens in the farthest jungles of the world to the most sophisticated cities, still it is not related to Jesus.
If again you hold law is the problem with world you are saying you are an anarchist. That is what people who believe like this are called. Or a biblical term is lawless. Again goodbye.
Do you condemn righteous living as evil? Yes. Again goodbye.
If you lived in the times of Moses you would have been thrown out as an unbeliever.
If you were a prophet, you would have been stoned to death as a false prophet.
There is a simple set of rules to approach God and His holy throne.
1. Righteousness
2. Respect for His ways
3. Acceptance of His command
Now in Jesus we have His righteousness, which bears fruit in our righteous walk.
But you deny all three propositions by denying the first in believing we can never walk righteously.
One thing you have to remember is there is no conversation until you accept Gods terms.
Yes, that stupid teaching is very young. What's your point?
Prince started preaching in the 90's. Here is a quote from Princes book Destined to reign
It all began in 1997, when I was on vacation with my wife, Wendy… I distinctly heard the voice of the Lord on the inside. It wasn’t a witness of the Spirit. It was a voice, and I heard God say clearly to me: “Son, you are not preaching grace.”I said, “What do You mean, Lord? That’s a low blow. That’s a real low blow!” I added, “I’m a preacher of grace. I have been a grace preacher for years, and like most preachers, I preach that we are saved by grace!”
So his ideas are really old.
I see it as being consistent to what HeRose has been saying all along. Can you show us where HeRose said 1 John 1 was NOT being addressed to believers? Thank you.You're disagreeing with yourself again.
I see it as being consistent to what HeRose has been saying all along. Can you show us where HeRose said 1 John 1 was NOT being addressed to believers? Thank you.