This video might help you better understand the success of Trumps campaign
[video=youtube;PJy8vTu66tE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJy8vTu66tE[/video]
I just watched the video. I don't think his points were conclusive.
About money, he shot himself in the foot by saying half of the money is given by the rest. Also, money doesn't change the issues. No matter how many commercials I'll see of Hillary Clinton's... those commercials... that money... isn't going to make me in a liberal democrat.
I'd have to see the studies he showed and how they were done. They'd have to take account in how we elect congressmen... and then they push issues for us. I'm not sure about it... we just saw a graph.
Also, those communities look really messed up. But, how many of those are there? If it's a few communities that are like that... it could just be some other reason other than corruption. If it's many communities then we should be more suspicions. Now, I doubt 89 million Americans are not represented because of those awkward communities. Him going from those awkward communities to 89 million Americans not being represented looks like a trick his playing on his audience. The simple truth that when we vote the majority wins is one reason why some or most of the 89 million Americans are not represented. Why did he use the awkward communities then? I believe he used it to make it sensational.... rhetoric... then he moved unto a point... a much bigger point, 89 million Americans not being represented which didn't exactly follow. Red hearing fallacy I think?
Again on 89 million not being represented. Considering that the majority wins. There will ALWAYS be the minority that won't be represented. I'm not politics or constitutional expert, but I believe there was a way minorities were made heard by something.
If not, maybe this is why we should give more power to the states... which could make communities of those minorities liking and they'd live in an environment more towards their liking.
About equality... I'm pretty sure equality by the constitution isn't about how rich or poor you are, but about your rights... like freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to own property... etc.
The idea that because someone is rich... vs someone is poor... is inequality is not constitutional. I doubt the founding fathers wanted everyone to be ABSOLUTELY equal in every way possible. That's communism. If that's what they wanted... then we'd be that from the beginning... we'd all be communist.