3rd Temple Updates

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
M

miktre

Guest
No, I choose to discern. To accept everything without thinking and analyzing it is dangerous. You might end up believing something wrong that Satan wants you to believe. But if you discern and make careful observations, you will be less prone to poor judgment.
Yes, discernment is the answer, not blindly believing one side. I used to believe exactly how you do and only listened the basic main stream media version. In recent years my views have changed. Education is the key, not hate.
 
O

oopsies

Guest
Yes, discernment is the answer, not blindly believing one side. I used to believe exactly how you do and only listened the basic main stream media version. In recent years my views have changed. Education is the key, not hate.
Exactly. BBC is mainstream media... so why did you post it as "proof?" Alternatively, BBC is not mainstream media. Then their disclosure that the ex-captain is no longer a captain in the Israeli forces cannot be false. If it is not false, then this ex-captain witness is tainted. What he says can very well be true but because there is an enormous possibility that he is saying it out of revenge discredits him.
 
M

miktre

Guest
Exactly. BBC is mainstream media... so why did you post it as "proof?" Alternatively, BBC is not mainstream media. Then their disclosure that the ex-captain is no longer a captain in the Israeli forces cannot be false. If it is not false, then this ex-captain witness is tainted. What he says can very well be true but because there is an enormous possibility that he is saying it out of revenge discredits him.
Believe me when I tell it is very rare when stories like this receive main stream attention. Viewers are absolutely bombarded with pro-Israel and anti-Palestine messages daily. I thought that since this was main stream and not an "alternative" source that some would find this argument at the very least reasonable.
 
C

Cup-of-Ruin

Guest
No, I choose to discern. To accept everything without thinking and analyzing it is dangerous. You might end up believing something wrong that Satan wants you to believe. But if you discern and make careful observations, you will be less prone to poor judgment.
Well the obeservation in regard to this thread is that the dispossession and illegal invasion of a nation and subsequent genocide, because modern Israel is a racist state, the only one in the world, in a land where once Muslims, Jews and Christians of all tribes had lived peacefully, this illegal invasion is from Satan, things like murder, theft, lying, they are from Satan, so we have Ashkenazim Jews, so by race they are not ancient Israelites they are converted to the religion of Judaism and they come from southern Russia and Eastern Europe and they pretend to be ancient Israelites and invade under disguise the holy land and claim it for themselves passing themselves off as 'Chosen people of God' thereby securing themselves strategic land, resources and the support of gullible christians, who then go on to fight wars and sacrifice themselves and give their wealth away to con-jobs! Thats what it is, its a con-job and the result is becoming increasing horrific and will continue until it is ended.

There is no Biblical support whatsoever for the building of a 'god's holy temple' on Earth in Jerusalem, a simple reading of the NT especially Revelations explains this very clearly, no biblical basis for a physical temple built in Jerusalem - the holy Temple of God is the body of Christ and exists indwelling the body of Christians on earth, for the anti-christ to take seat in the holy temple is for the spirit of the anti-christ to came and take it seat in you, that meant seat of authority, the authority of the anti-christ over the body of the Christians and we see that evident today, with zionist pro-Israeli christians supporting a false people in a false land, that are anti-christs.
 
O

oopsies

Guest
Well the obeservation in regard to this thread is that the dispossession and illegal invasion of a nation and subsequent genocide, because modern Israel is a racist state, the only one in the world, in a land where once Muslims, Jews and Christians of all tribes had lived peacefully, this illegal invasion is from Satan, things like murder, theft, lying, they are from Satan, so we have Ashkenazim Jews, so by race they are not ancient Israelites they are converted to the religion of Judaism and they come from southern Russia and Eastern Europe and they pretend to be ancient Israelites and invade under disguise the holy land and claim it for themselves passing themselves off as 'Chosen people of God' thereby securing themselves strategic land, resources and the support of gullible christians, who then go on to fight wars and sacrifice themselves and give their wealth away to con-jobs! Thats what it is, its a con-job and the result is becoming increasing horrific and will continue until it is ended.

There is no Biblical support whatsoever for the building of a 'god's holy temple' on Earth in Jerusalem, a simple reading of the NT especially Revelations explains this very clearly, no biblical basis for a physical temple built in Jerusalem - the holy Temple of God is the body of Christ and exists indwelling the body of Christians on earth, for the anti-christ to take seat in the holy temple is for the spirit of the anti-christ to came and take it seat in you, that meant seat of authority, the authority of the anti-christ over the body of the Christians and we see that evident today, with zionist pro-Israeli christians supporting a false people in a false land, that are anti-christs.
See, the problem with why people aren't buying what you say is simply because you only show one side of the story. We are all discerning and discernment naturally tells us that you need the whole picture - not just one side. No one here disagrees with you that Palestinians get killed. But what people disagree with you is that only Palestinians are victims. Why can't someone claim the opposite to be true? That Israel is just as much of a victim as Palestine? If you were to show proof that Israel has never ever experienced terrorism and that their children are never ever hurt or injured by Palestinians, then people would buy your story. Except you don't. You take someone's proof/evidence and say the reverse. Why should anyone take you seriously?

Let me ask you this: what is your goal? Is it to make everyone go away and ignore the "truth" that you are telling us? Or is it to get us to believe your "truth?" If it is the latter, then you're going to have to play within our framework. It's like telling an atheist that there's God. Do you think by telling an atheist that there is a God will change their minds? Of course not. Same thing here.

By the way, that region has never been at "peace." There is always some war going on since biblical times.
 
O

oopsies

Guest
Believe me when I tell it is very rare when stories like this receive main stream attention. Viewers are absolutely bombarded with pro-Israel and anti-Palestine messages daily. I thought that since this was main stream and not an "alternative" source that some would find this argument at the very least reasonable.
Well, if it is mainstream, then by your own agreement, then what they show is "false." That's why you stopped watching mainstream newscasts. You said that yourself. So if mainstream newscasts present false lies and information. How can we take this one as truth? Even if it is truth, there will still be some falsity because the newscast has an agenda to make us see something other than what we want to see. So at the end of the day, what they say is still false and cannot be taken as truth including the clip that you showed us because their agenda is to lie to us in some form - their agenda is to twist the truth so that it is false. So any truth that they show is already twisted so that we will not see it as truth. In essence, I cannot take that clip to be true because it is mainstream and they have an agenda to show me some kind of falsity. I cannot tell what is falsity therefore, everything that ex-captain and anchorman said must be taken as completely false lest I should be deceived. The safest way is to treat the whole thing as false. You wouldn't want us to accidentally believe a part of the falsity at the cost of believing a small bit of truth, would you? Wouldn't you want us to believe the whole truth rather than some truth and a lot of false?
 
M

miktre

Guest
Well, if it is mainstream, then by your own agreement, then what they show is "false." That's why you stopped watching mainstream newscasts. You said that yourself. So if mainstream newscasts present false lies and information. How can we take this one as truth? Even if it is truth, there will still be some falsity because the newscast has an agenda to make us see something other than what we want to see. So at the end of the day, what they say is still false and cannot be taken as truth including the clip that you showed us because their agenda is to lie to us in some form - their agenda is to twist the truth so that it is false. So any truth that they show is already twisted so that we will not see it as truth. In essence, I cannot take that clip to be true because it is mainstream and they have an agenda to show me some kind of falsity. I cannot tell what is falsity therefore, everything that ex-captain and anchorman said must be taken as completely false lest I should be deceived. The safest way is to treat the whole thing as false. You wouldn't want us to accidentally believe a part of the falsity at the cost of believing a small bit of truth, would you? Wouldn't you want us to believe the whole truth rather than some truth and a lot of false?
I never said everything in the main stream media was false, I said it was pro-Israel. He said its going to hurt Israel in the long run. Another words, the guy is still pro-Israel yet wants the war crime to stop. The pro-Israel blood thirsty in here don't even want that.
 
O

oopsies

Guest
I never said everything in the main stream media was false, I said it was pro-Israel. He said its going to hurt Israel in the long run. Another words, the guy is still pro-Israel yet wants the war crime to stop. The pro-Israel blood thirsty in here don't even want that.
But how do I know that's the truth? Even you don't even like watching mainstream newscasts anymore... there could be falsity woven into the truth!
 
M

miktre

Guest
But how do I know that's the truth? Even you don't even like watching mainstream newscasts anymore... there could be falsity woven into the truth!
Try doing research and educate yourself.
 
O

oopsies

Guest
but i already have and already made some conclusions... i was under the impression that you wanted to change my conclusions because you feel i have the wrong info?
 
M

miktre

Guest
but i already have and already made some conclusions... i was under the impression that you wanted to change my conclusions because you feel i have the wrong info?
I want to simply put the information out there, some will open their hearts to this, some won't.
 
O

oopsies

Guest
but wouldn't you want ALL to open their hearts or rather, as many as possible?
 
O

oopsies

Guest
Sure, with the hope that this travesty might end.
It's not much of a travesty to me... it seems so obvious to me that if you want to convince someone or open their hearts, then present it in such a way that they would be receptive to it. You can't throw a Bible in an atheist's face and expect them to believe. Rather, that sort of behaviour will turn them away and you would've done more harm than good. But it's ok for you to do that to us and when we turn away, you blame it on our hardened hearts rather than on your poor presentation skills...?
 
M

miktre

Guest
It's not much of a travesty to me... it seems so obvious to me that if you want to convince someone or open their hearts, then present it in such a way that they would be receptive to it. You can't throw a Bible in an atheist's face and expect them to believe. Rather, that sort of behaviour will turn them away and you would've done more harm than good. But it's ok for you to do that to us and when we turn away, you blame it on our hardened hearts rather than on your poor presentation skills...?
You should focus on the information put forth.
Also consider we are dealing with a very abrasive group that has been presented 'outrageous' information for the first time.

Though you personally may never see the other side of it, many guests will see this and some will go and research and find truth.
 
O

oopsies

Guest
You should focus on the information put forth.
Also consider we are dealing with a very abrasive group that has been presented 'outrageous' information for the first time.

Though you personally may never see the other side of it, many guests will see this and some will go and research and find truth.
That the Jews massacre the Palestinians and the Palestinians have not ever ever ever done the same to the Jews regardless of whether it was in defense, retaliation, or hatred?
 
M

miktre

Guest
That the Jews massacre the Palestinians and the Palestinians have not ever ever ever done the same to the Jews regardless of whether it was in defense, retaliation, or hatred?

Who said that? One is aggressor and the other is oppressed.
 
O

oopsies

Guest

Who said that? One is aggressor and the other is oppressed.
Well, here's your chance to clarify... I'm asking for knowledge, can you clarify it specifically in simple black and white terms? Because now I am confused between all the death images and videos were posted showing Israelis killing Palestinian children...?
 
M

miktre

Guest
Well, here's your chance to clarify... I'm asking for knowledge, can you clarify it specifically in simple black and white terms? Because now I am confused between all the death images and videos were posted showing Israelis killing Palestinian children...?
Is there wrong being done on both sides? Yes, In the operation the soldiers in the video were talking about 1,000 jews died and 300,000 Palestinians.
The jews are the aggressors and the Palestinians are oppressed. Just like the former captain in the Israeli forces said, its an "open air prison". What was their crime? When the jews first arrived 35% of Palestinians were Christian. What was their crime?
 
O

oopsies

Guest
That is just one instance. You are forgetting that before the Jews got their nation back, the same thing happened to them. They were the ones being oppressed back then. So where was the "justice" of all that? After all, they are God's chosen people.