I've been looking at some young-earth creationist websites, and noticed that a lot of time is spent showing that the conventional dates for rocks and stuff is wrong, that the earth is much younger.
but the dates talked about don't always support a 6,000 year old earth.
from Library: Radio-Carbon Dating Proves a Young Earth
"For example, a rock aged by two different scientists using the most advanced radiometric technique was reported to be 10,000 years old by one scientist. The other scientist aged the same rock at several billion years."
is the 10,000 reliable?
what dates are arrived at with proper carbon-dating etc?
but the dates talked about don't always support a 6,000 year old earth.
from Library: Radio-Carbon Dating Proves a Young Earth
"For example, a rock aged by two different scientists using the most advanced radiometric technique was reported to be 10,000 years old by one scientist. The other scientist aged the same rock at several billion years."
is the 10,000 reliable?
what dates are arrived at with proper carbon-dating etc?