BTW, hyper-grace has had its day here I would hope? It's been wrestled to tears
As long as the corpse keeps moving, we'll have to keep driving stakes into its heart.
BTW, hyper-grace has had its day here I would hope? It's been wrestled to tears
As long as the corpse keeps moving, we'll have to keep driving stakes into its heart.
to which guys exactly?
want to name anyone here with your labels?
see, no matter how many times this is denied, it falls on deaf ears because if anyone would acknowledge it, there would be
no more dickering and folks might actually agree on a few things
I have noticed however, that when someone cannot define their belief by scripture, they quickly post about hyper grace or anti-spiritual gifts or some other red herring
to which guys exactly?
want to name anyone here with your labels?
see, no matter how many times this is denied, it falls on deaf ears because if anyone would acknowledge it, there would be
no more dickering and folks might actually agree on a few things
I have noticed however, that when someone cannot define their belief by scripture, they quickly post about hyper grace or anti-spiritual gifts or some other red herring
I think that's what's meant when the bible calls people blameless (instead of sinless or perfect).
Blameless
G273 ἄμεμπτος amemptos (am'-emp-tos) adj.
1. irreproachable
We are guiltless because we are in Christ and clothed with his irreproachable righteousness. That's really grace in a nutshell.
Those who label as legalists any who teach as Jesus did regarding following commandments.to which guys exactly?
'Grace' believers. You figure out who they are.
Sorry I don't play this game anymore of 'grace' believers saying this or that, and then later claiming that they didn't say this or that. Constant redefinitions and shape-shifting is their modus operandi.
We know what they believe, and it just gets better every day. They can't hide anymore.
'Grace' believers. You figure out who they are.
Sorry I don't play this game anymore of 'grace' believers saying this or that, and then later claiming that they didn't say this or that. Constant redefinitions and shape-shifting is their modus operandi.
We know what they believe, and it just gets better every day. They can't hide anymore.
Amen !!!!!!!!!!!! Except that we do not apply grace, we accept it.
Who is this "we"? Because the person who first put a like on your post goes around slandering others, and pretending they don't. I just don't see any love in that....We love Him because He first loved us. And then we are able to love others because we are full and not lacking.
Who is this "we"? Because the person who first put a like on your post goes around slandering others, and pretending they don't. I just don't see any love in that.
btw, I just noticed something that isn't true. GOD's law is written on our hearts, not the new covenant. Not sure what you meant by that, but it's simply not true.
Jesus washes us clean of sin, so we are righteous.
It is not Jesus's righteousness that makes us righteous. We are righteous because our faith is deemed as righteousness.
But we are not allowed to walk in sin and claim we are righteous.
So God does not see Christs righteousness instead of our sin, he sees a repented redeemed sinner turned saint.
I have heard this righteousness argument but it is not biblical.
“He himself bore our sins” in his body on the cross, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; “by his wounds you have been healed.”
1 Peter 2:24
So your saying that you can cheat on your wife and rob steal and kill and still be accepted into the Kingdom of Heaven
Unfortunately I was a bit unclear. I am suggesting hyper-grace argument is saying we can be called righteous and sin, but I disagree, I would say this is heresy.
It's not what, but Who.
That is presenting a false dichotomy. We are saved by grace; created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do. Teaching both is a more balanced view than focusing on just one or the other, which creates an imbalance.
To these guys grace is defined as anti-work (i.e., anti-do-anything). Thus the false dichotomy.
As long as the corpse keeps moving, we'll have to keep driving stakes into its heart.