Rapture= false teaching

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
M

miktre

Guest
#1,801
#1,801
walt2000 said:
You have to keep it in Revelation .To understand Revelation .Rev.22/18-19​
Click to expand...
18For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

I think you are confusing adding with verses in Revelation referencing to other verses of the Bible.
Example:
Rev 16
15Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.

You can see here where Revelations quotes a Christ in another book so we can confirm the word. This is very different from adding to the book of Revelations. By this we know to go back and see what Christ himself taught. This is not adding to Revelations, rather getting confirmation in the word. Big, big difference. The book of Revelations doesn't contradict the rest of the Bible, it confirms it.
 
W

walt2000

Guest
#1,802
#1,802
I think you are confusing adding with verses in Revelation referencing to other verses of the Bible.
Example:
Rev 16
15Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame

Revelation is a stand alone book.This tells you To leave the scripture alone ,Just yet . The vomit of the dragon.After the woman and Child.
They have been tamped with ,And to leave opinion alone, opinion of man until Christ Opens and give you the Key,walt2000​
 
W

walt2000

Guest
#1,803
#1,803
The Key is the Seven Thunders ,Tied together with the Eighth Thunder The Great Thunder.You Have to Get The Key To understand.Revelations.walt2000​
 
W

walt2000

Guest
#1,804
#1,804
That is why Revelation has been hidden for two thousand years. You Have to wait to get the Key.Christ holds the Keys to Heaven and Hell.And Guess what ,The key is given .The Seven Thunders.walt2000​
 
Z

Zilla64007

Banned
#1,805
Jan 14, 2010
1,010
5
0
#1,805
The Book of Revelation was not hidden for 2000 years. Jesus Christ gave us and told us everything ahead of time.

Matthew 24:25
Behold, I have told you beforehand.
 
W

walt2000

Guest
#1,806
#1,806
Zilla64007 said:
The Book of Revelation was not hidden for 2000 years. Jesus Christ gave us and told us everything ahead of time.

Matthew 24:25
Behold, I have told you beforehand.
Click to expand...
Ya, and Three Thousand types of Christians in the World, Have the right versions of it' interpretation to. Your wrong and if you don' see the Thunders .walt2000​
 
Last edited:
Z

Zilla64007

Banned
#1,807
Jan 14, 2010
1,010
5
0
#1,807
and you're the only one who got it right?... that's taking an awfully high and mighty position, walt.
 
M

miktre

Guest
#1,808
#1,808
walt2000 said:
The interpretation of Revelations.
The Revelation of Christ to John
Open to all,no holds barred.with belate.
Only one Rule. That Christ made himself Rev.22/18 -20
walt2000(Acts 2:16-17) “But this is that which was spoken by the prophet Joel; And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams:”

Walt, you just broke your own rule here by implying that the seven thunders is interpreted according to the Book of Acts. Revelations said the seven thunders were sealed. It doesn't say they will be unsealed by prophets. You will have to add to Revelations to teach this doctrine. Beware of Rev 22:18-20
​

Ask anybody,(that Say's he is a prophet of Rev.) if they can interpet Rev .10, and tell you what the seven thunders said to the church's, if they stay within Revelation, and don't use any other book , then they are worth listening too, if they can not then leave them alone, they are false prophets.They all commit the same sin ,of Revelation 22/18 and are condemned.To with the plagues of Rev.
It says nowhere in Revelations or any where else in the Bible that those who don't unseal the seven thunders is a false prophet. This is Lie! It doesn't even say when they will be unsealed.
It never says that the book of Revelations doesn't confirm other books in the Bible. This is a Lie! I already gave you an example:"Behold, I come as a thief" Can you interpret the meaning of this scripture??? You can not without the Gospels and Pauls teaching, thus proving you wrong.

1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified by his angel unto his servant John:

1:3 Blessed he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time at hand.


Unless you are compelled to study this ,leave it alone .Read Rev.22/18-19 and underline it.


22:18 I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book, if anyone adds to them, may God add to him the plagues which are written in this book. 22:19 If anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, may God take away his part from the tree of life, and out of the holy city, which are written in this book.

This is not a End of Time Prediction. It is a true interp. of Revelation no time is Known​
Click to expand...
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
#1,809
#1,809
walt2000 said:
Revelation is a stand alone book.This tells you To leave the scripture alone ,Just yet . The vomit of the dragon.After the woman and Child.

They have been tamped with ,And to leave opinion alone, opinion of man until Christ Opens and give you the Key,walt2000​
Click to expand...
No book of the Bible is "stand alone" because there is one Divine Author. Even a glimpse at Daniel and Zechariah will show that they have much to contribute in the understanding of Revelation.
 
W

walt2000

Guest
#1,810
#1,810


Prove this wrong and you might have something.
 
W

walt2000

Guest
#1,811
#1,811
You can not argue with the absolute ,except ,may be shut them down.
When they are making their point, and the moment they start in ,with another scripture, other then Rev.
You point out the infraction against the rule in Rev.22/18 that , shuts them down ,dead, in the water, then, you bring up Rev.10/4 Explain Rev.10/4 with out introducing any other bible point or version .You baffle them with you intellect.
Mind You,You may lose a so called friend, but ,you may win a soul for Christ. I have been eased out of many a church in the middle of their testimony on their version of the pope hating so called Christians.
Some People Kiss you ,while other people have to reassess their view ,and really, try to change the subject.
So keeping to the rule of Rev.22/18 it is a defensive method ,in favour of your church ,.As if he needs help.Walt2000
 
M

miktre

Guest
#1,812
#1,812
walt2000 said:
You can not argue with the absolute ,except ,may be shut them down.
When they are making their point, and the moment they start in ,with another scripture, other then Rev.
You point out the infraction against the rule in Rev.22/18 that , shuts them down ,dead, in the water, then, you bring up Rev.10/4 Explain Rev.10/4 with out introducing any other bible point or version .You baffle them with you intellect.
Mind You,You may lose a so called friend, but ,you may win a soul for Christ. I have been eased out of many a church in the middle of their testimony on their version of the pope hating so called Christians.
Some People Kiss you ,while other people have to reassess their view ,and really, try to change the subject.
So keeping to the rule of Rev.22/18 it is a defensive method ,in favour of your church ,.As if he needs help.Walt2000
Click to expand...
You are avoiding the "behold, I come as a thief" quote I put forth. Secondly, did you not do this very thing when you quoted Acts?
 
G

greatkraw

Guest
#1,814
#1,814
i just wanna say

you are all wrong

it is hard to say who is wronger:)
 
VW

VW

Banned
#1,815
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
#1,815
greatkraw said:
i just wanna say

you are all wrong

it is hard to say who is wronger:)
Click to expand...
I like that, wronger.

I got in trouble with my grandmother once, I said more gooder. She asked me what I meant, and I said, you know, gooder, more gooder, and way more gooder.
 
phil36

phil36

Senior Member
#1,816
Feb 12, 2009
8,276
2,126
113
#1,816
Lol these threads really amuse me. there's one thing for definite, Our Lord and saviour is coming back. How that pans out, well we could argue amongst ourselves until that day. I must admit when it comes to the book of revelation Im not totally convinced by all the flow charts, fancy diagrams etc.

Many believe that alot of the book of revelation has taken place already. all the talk of rapture the rise of Europe etc is in the scheme of things new teachings, particularly with the rise of dispensationalism, which as far as i know started with the Brethern here in the UK.

So when was the book of revelation written? this will also assert how you see the apocalyptic writing of John, was it definitely in the 90's or was it before 70Ad. and there is no definite certainty on either side, just arguments put forward by Scholars,
Do you read revelations in a linear fashion? or as one group showing God's victory over evil and His workings for His people who will be glorified.

Anyhow, this be totally honest with ourselves, we are not totally sure how it is all going to pan out, yes that may come as a shock, as maybe your favourite TV evangelist may expound his or her own theology, but there are other sides of the coin.

Kind Regards

Phil
 
phil36

phil36

Senior Member
#1,817
Feb 12, 2009
8,276
2,126
113
#1,817
By the way Miktre, that is a lovely chart.. means absolutely nothing. Just another fallible mans ideas maybe right maybe wrong!

Kind regards

Phil
 
phil36

phil36

Senior Member
#1,819
Feb 12, 2009
8,276
2,126
113
#1,819
oops sorry, nice chart walt200, that Miktre is using. or whoever origanally spent alot of their energy drawing it out.

Thanks for pointing that out Zilla

Kind regards

Phil
 
M

miktre

Guest
#1,820
#1,820
I'm not using it for anything. He wants to use it to prove that anybody that doesn't know the thunders is a false prophet, which in itself is not Biblical. The chart really has no value whatsoever other than that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.