well that is your opinion, I think it is interesting we like to discredit something that God has done by our own negative experience. I know ,many who would also discredit the bible because man wrote it . I stand on the biblical context not a pentecostal / Charismatic church experience. what is babbling/ and what is Tongues ? because I do not see the word babble used in the Acts account nor in 1cor 12, 13, 14 nor in Gospel Mark 16 .
What I said was:
I left, because I realized 99% of what I was hearing was utter nonsense. Same with the prophecy. Now, I am not saying that God will not use people to speak in tongues or prophecy, but I am saying they are rare gifts today.
I guess I should explain the "utter nonsense." For me, it was people speaking in tongues using one syllable, over and over. Every time they spoke. Not sure how that is an unknown tongue. I also speak French and German, and I know you have to have more than one, or two or even 4 syllables that are repeated over week after week, Sunday after Sunday.
Another excess was the rowdy over emotionalism. I'm not talking about lifting hands. I'm talking about rolling in the aisles, or things being much worse than any bar I ever played in with drunks.
Then there were things out of order. Person after person speaking in tongues and nary an interpretation in sight. And this wasn't just one church, but many. In different places, non denom and denom.
Then there were people who thought they were more spiritual than the rest of the congregation because they always seemed to have a word of prophecy, just before the sermon. Which was more important than the sermon.
And as I studied the references in the NT concerning tongues, it became obvious that God really used them to reach the world with the gospel. Well, except for "unknown" tongues. But then, if they were a real language, that God gave to someone, they weren't unknown, were they?
As I studied the Bible more and more, I came to the conclusion that "a fresh, new Word" actually devalued the Bible. Because God left us his Word for us to grow and learn - not a church service where things got out of hand. Oh, and when those "fresh new words" contradicted the Bible, but no one would speak against it for fear of "blaspheming the Holy Spirit," that really bothered me too. More likely God will be judging those who have usurped the place of the Holy Spirit.
I don't judge anyone who knows the Word, and puts it first. But I do not like the terrible excesses in the charismatic church, at places like the Toronto "Revival" and I use the word revival loosely.
No, man certainly did not write the Bible. Maybe the words on paper were written by a person, but after 2000 years, we can be absolutely certain that the Holy Spirit inspired the whole Bible (3500 years for the OT) Your argument is a false one.
And no, my point to objecting to tongues, at least in their modern counterpart is exactly because babbling is NOT used in Acts or 1 Cor. But that is what I heard constantly in church. As someone with some Biblical discretion, and a knowledge of linguistics, that was not hard to figure out.
Besides, even if no one anywhere ever spoke in tongues again, would it really be a loss to the church? I don't think so, because as long as we have the Bible, we have all we need to really learn about not only who God is, but his expectations for us, and all the theology we will ever need.