^^ Well that's the nature of being a so-called "progressive". Updating, fixing, changing, evolving policies. I don't think it has to lead to tyranny though. It seems so weird to me that people are against this...especially on this site! lol I thought it was the Christian duty to give to the poor and help people... the homeless, the sick, etc... We go and do missionary work and all that but somehow it's wrong to do it through governmental processes and taxing? This logic is so bizarre to me. What's the point of missionary work? To help people and aide them, right? Giving to charities to make homeless and sickly people's lives easier... Free healthcare is an essential part of Christianity, to me.
^^ Well that's the nature of being a so-called "progressive". Updating, fixing, changing, evolving policies. I don't think it has to lead to tyranny though. It seems so weird to me that people are against this...especially on this site! lol I thought it was the Christian duty to give to the poor and help people... the homeless, the sick, etc... We go and do missionary work and all that but somehow it's wrong to do it through governmental processes and taxing? This logic is so bizarre to me. What's the point of missionary work? To help people and aide them, right? Giving to charities to make homeless and sickly people's lives easier... Free healthcare is an essential part of Christianity, to me.
Honest question: Why do you feel that embracing some socialistic principals is anti-christian? Take something like universal health care for example, which is a socialistic concept. Is that somehow anti-christian? Wanting everyone to be entitled to great health and not limit excellent care to the rich?
My above post took awhile to post and was directed at "Sirk" so sorry for the continuity issues with this dialogue..
Anyway, ramx, I see your point. And that's an excellent question! "How would you reverse the all out corruption (both in gov and by the users) of the social programs we have today?"
I don't have all the answers. But I do believe that sitting back and allowing it all to stagnate won't solve anything. Moving gradually in a slight directions towards universal healthcare I think would be the thing to do. Constant revising and re-thinking how to better achieve it, and making sure the House of Representatives is in tact and it's not a rigged two-party system and our votes actually count would be a good start to help prevent greedy fame-driven politicians. People do abuse it. I'm not that familiar with the legalities of all this stuff, but maybe have mandatory drug tests in place for people on welfare? I'm not sure if they already do that. I'm sure there must be little things we could do to get the world a better place.
I don't think not having universal healthcare makes for a good place. All other first world countries have it and they seem to be doing alright. What's wrong with the U.S.?
Bernie Sanders is Senator of Vermont. Vermont is a beautiful state.
My above post took awhile to post and was directed at "Sirk" so sorry for the continuity issues with this dialogue..
Anyway, ramx, I see your point. And that's an excellent question! "How would you reverse the all out corruption (both in gov and by the users) of the social programs we have today?"
I don't have all the answers. But I do believe that sitting back and allowing it all to stagnate won't solve anything. Moving gradually in a slight directions towards universal healthcare I think would be the thing to do. Constant revising and re-thinking how to better achieve it, and making sure the House of Representatives is in tact and it's not a rigged two-party system and our votes actually count would be a good start to help prevent greedy fame-driven politicians. People do abuse it. I'm not that familiar with the legalities of all this stuff, but maybe have mandatory drug tests in place for people on welfare? I'm not sure if they already do that. I'm sure there must be little things we could do to get the world a better place.
I don't think not having universal healthcare makes for a good place. All other first world countries have it and they seem to be doing alright. What's wrong with the U.S.?
^^ Well that's the nature of being a so-called "progressive". Updating, fixing, changing, evolving policies. I don't think it has to lead to tyranny though. It seems so weird to me that people are against this...especially on this site! lol I thought it was the Christian duty to give to the poor and help people... the homeless, the sick, etc... We go and do missionary work and all that but somehow it's wrong to do it through governmental processes and taxing? This logic is so bizarre to me. What's the point of missionary work? To help people and aide them, right? Giving to charities to make homeless and sickly people's lives easier... Free healthcare is an essential part of Christianity, to me.
My above post took awhile to post and was directed at "Sirk" so sorry for the continuity issues with this dialogue..
Anyway, ramx, I see your point. And that's an excellent question! "How would you reverse the all out corruption (both in gov and by the users) of the social programs we have today?"
I don't have all the answers. But I do believe that sitting back and allowing it all to stagnate won't solve anything. Moving gradually in a slight directions towards universal healthcare I think would be the thing to do. Constant revising and re-thinking how to better achieve it, and making sure the House of Representatives is in tact and it's not a rigged two-party system and our votes actually count would be a good start to help prevent greedy fame-driven politicians. People do abuse it. I'm not that familiar with the legalities of all this stuff, but maybe have mandatory drug tests in place for people on welfare? I'm not sure if they already do that. I'm sure there must be little things we could do to get the world a better place.
I don't think not having universal healthcare makes for a good place. All other first world countries have it and they seem to be doing alright. What's wrong with the U.S.?
But you said name ONE country, I'll name several. Sweden, Denmark, France, Canada, Great Britain, Scotland, etc.. There is an AMAZING documentary by Michael Moore called "Sicko" that is about the healthcare system. I highly recommend you watch it with an open mind. I know it's easy to jump the gun and see that he's a liberal and there are many conservatives here, but really, before you judge, actually watch it all the way through. It's actually highly entertaining and informative.
But you said name ONE country, I'll name several. Sweden, Denmark, France, Canada, Great Britain, Scotland, etc.. There is an AMAZING documentary by Michael Moore called "Sicko" that is about the healthcare system. I highly recommend you watch it with an open mind. I know it's easy to jump the gun and see that he's a liberal and there are many conservatives here, but really, before you judge, actually watch it all the way through. It's actually highly entertaining and informative.
Socialists devolve into Communists. Communists operate at the business end of a gun. Totalitarian socialism is communism. Ask Cuba how that has worked out for them.^^ Well that's the nature of being a so-called "progressive". Updating, fixing, changing, evolving policies. I don't think it has to lead to tyranny though. It seems so weird to me that people are against this...especially on this site! lol I thought it was the Christian duty to give to the poor and help people... the homeless, the sick, etc... We go and do missionary work and all that but somehow it's wrong to do it through governmental processes and taxing? This logic is so bizarre to me. What's the point of missionary work? To help people and aide them, right? Giving to charities to make homeless and sickly people's lives easier... Free healthcare is an essential part of Christianity, to me.
But you said name ONE country, I'll name several. Sweden, Denmark, France, Canada, Great Britain, Scotland, etc.. There is an AMAZING documentary by Michael Moore called "Sicko" that is about the healthcare system. I highly recommend you watch it with an open mind. I know it's easy to jump the gun and see that he's a liberal and there are many conservatives here, but really, before you judge, actually watch it all the way through. It's actually highly entertaining and informative.
It certainly is! The Sound of Music family moved there... the uhhhh, Von Trapps. Ya,they have a lovely place up there in the mountains.
Solzhenitsyn called it home as well. Though I think he held a pretty low opinion of Sanders.