200 Proofs Earth Is Not A Spinning Ball Videobook By Eric Dubay

[posthuman]

They are Freemasons.

all this flat-disc-earth nonsense has its origins in freemasonry.

"zetetic astronomy" as it was called in the 1800's was made popular by a freemason named Samuel Birley Rowbotham under the pseudonym "parallax"

masonic 'debate clubs' are still called "zetetic societies"

the flat earth society was formed in the late 1800's and originally called the "universal zetetic society"

it was revived in 1970 by a freemason.

this guy Eric Dubay from the thread title, OP, and most of the videos spherical spams, is a freemason whose family has long, deep ties in freemasonry.

this thing has freemasonry written all over it, all up inside its DNA.

interesting, eh?

 

[Spherical]

Whoa, wait one second, hold on...
I don't know much, but I know any good researcher studies not only his theory, but looks at others too, so he can get a wider understanding of the bigger picture, and a honest researcher usually has a openess until they are convinced through much time and labor and scientific means that their position is true or not.
I know that with nutrition I studied not only about foods and the effects of them on the human body, but also meds, and the treatments of chronic and acute diseases by the established conventional medicine.
So your telling me you have not even considered the other view?
If yu have not, you did poor research.
If you have, what do they say?

I am telling you, people who claim to believe the earth is a globe don't like to answer these types of questions.

 

[Tintin]

They are not all freemasons. In fact most of them are not. Where did you get that from?

No, no. I don't believe that at all. That's what Spherical seems to believe.

 

[MsSuzanna]

Whoa, wait one second, hold on...
I don't know much, but I know any good researcher studies not only his theory, but looks at others too, so he can get a wider understanding of the bigger picture, and a honest researcher usually has a openess until they are convinced through much time and labor and scientific means that their position is true or not.
I know that with nutrition I studied not only about foods and the effects of them on the human body, but also meds, and the treatments of chronic and acute diseases by the established conventional medicine.
So your telling me you have not even considered the other view?
If yu have not, you did poor research.
If you have, what do they say?

You reason a good point.

 

[Spherical]

Quoting "Zetetic Cosmogeny" Thomas Winships states: "
[FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman]Let ‘imagination’ picture to the mind what force air would have which was set in motion by a spherical body of 8,000 miles in diameter, which in one hour was spinning round 1,000 mph, rushing through space at 65,000 mph and gyrating across the heavens? Then let ‘conjecture’ endeavor to discover whether the inhabitants on such a globe could keep their hair on? If the earth-globe rotates on its axis at the terrific rate of 1,000 miles an hour, such an immense mass would of necessity cause a tremendous rush of wind in the space it occupied. The wind would go all one way, and anything like clouds which got ‘within the sphere of influence’ of the rotating sphere, would have to go the same way. [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman]The fact that the earth is at rest is proved by kite flying[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman][/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman][/FONT][/FONT]."

 

[Tintin]

all this flat-disc-earth nonsense has its origins in freemasonry.

"zetetic astronomy" as it was called in the 1800's was made popular by a freemason namedSamuel Birley Rowbotham under the pseudonym "parallax"

masonic 'debate clubs' are still called "zetetic societies"

the flat earth society was formed in the late 1800's and originally called the "universal zetetic society"

it was revived in 1970 by a freemason.

this guy Eric Dubay from the thread title, OP, and most of the videos spherical spams, is a freemason whose family has long, deep ties in freemasonry.

this thing has freemasonry written all over it, all up inside its DNA.

interesting, eh?

Right. And before that, the belief goes back to a few ancient pagan religions. Many cultures understood the earth was not flat by the 6th century BC.

 

[MsSuzanna]

They are Freemasons.

You are starting to sound a bit off balanced. I told you about that rabbit hole being very deep and dark

 

[Spherical]

If "gravity" is credited with being a force strong enough to hold the world’s oceans, buildings, people and atmosphere stuck to the surface of a rapidly spinning ball, then it is impossible for "gravity" to also simultaneously be weak enough to allow little birds, bugs, and planes to take-off and travel freely unabated in any direction.

 

[Spherical]

If "gravity" is credited with being a force strong enough to curve the massive expanse of oceans around a globular Earth, it would be impossible for fish and other creatures to swim through such forcefully held water.

 

[posthuman]

I am telling you, people who claim to believe the earth is a globe don't like to answer these types of questions.

dude, i've answered all o' these questions. i just get tired of doing it because you ignore clear proofs and i end up wasting a lot of time while you just post more ridiculous lies that have been obviously refuted multiple times.

so what the heck are you talking about?

go do that experiment in your car. people who believe in flat earth don't like to do actual experiments -- they just like to kneel at the youtube altar and pray to their little flat-earth idol & ask it which video to post next in order to dodge people's questions.

 

[JosephsDreams]

I am telling you, people who claim to believe the earth is a globe don't like to answer these types of questions.

Okaay, so your saying the info is just not available, because these people don't like to answer these type of things? Or are you saying you exhausted your research, and there is no answer to challenge you?
Or are you saying that they don't like to answer, but the info is locked away somewhere in a vault, but you can't get to it?

 

[Spherical]

Ship captains in navigating great distances at sea never need to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their calculations. Both Plane Sailing and Great Circle Sailing, the most popular navigation methods, use plane, not spherical trigonometry, making all mathematical calculations on the assumption that the Earth is perfectly flat. If the Earth were in fact a sphere, such an errant assumption would lead to constant glaring inaccuracies. Plane Sailing has worked perfectly fine in both theory and practice for thousands of years, however, and plane trigonometry has time and again proven
more accurate than spherical trigonometry in determining distances across the oceans.

 

[Spherical]

If the Earth were truly a globe, then every line of latitude south of the equator would have to measure a gradually smaller and smaller circumference the farther South travelled. If, however, the Earth is an extended plane, then every line of latitude south of the equator should measure a gradually larger and larger circumference the farther South travelled. The fact that many captains navigating south of the equator assuming the globular theory have found themselves drastically out of reckoning, moreso the farther South travelled, testifies to the fact that the Earth is not a ball.

 

[Tintin]

Hey, Spherical, dude. Please, stop promoting Freemason beliefs. You're upsetting the children.

 

[posthuman]

If "gravity" is credited with being a force strong enough to curve the massive expanse of oceans around a globular Earth, it would be impossible for fish and other creatures to swim through such forcefully held water.

false. even "sensible" flat-earth-nuts ((if there is such a thing -- actually there's not)) say that the force of gravity is due to the constant upward acceleration of the disc. which would present the same imaginary "conundrum" -- go to the flat earth society's masonic website and look it up. it's what the current president believes. see this article about him: http://www.theguardian.com/global/2010/feb/23/flat-earth-society
show me the math that says that is the case.

oh - can you not do actual physics?

 

[posthuman]

Okaay, so your saying the info is just not available, because these people don't like to answer these type of things? Or are you saying you exhausted your research, and there is no answer to challenge you?
Or are you saying that they don't like to answer, but the info is locked away somewhere in a vault, but you can't get to it?

he's saying post already answered all this stuff, and plenty of other people have too, but it's more convenient for him to ignore that fact so he can go on perpetuating lies.

 

[JosephsDreams]

If "gravity" is credited with being a force strong enough to hold the world’s oceans, buildings, people and atmosphere stuck to the surface of a rapidly spinning ball, then it is impossible for "gravity" to also simultaneously be weak enough to allow little birds, bugs, and planes to take-off and travel freely unabated in any direction.

There is also atmospheric pressure you know. And anatomical design that can cause lift and reduce wind resistance. And just pure blunt force like the engines of a jet plane that produce thrust. If your looking at gravity as the only force that decides who is earth bound and who isn't, your making a serious error.

 

[Spherical]

Okaay, so your saying the info is just not available, because these people don't like to answer these type of things? Or are you saying you exhausted your research, and there is no answer to challenge you?
Or are you saying that they don't like to answer, but the info is locked away somewhere in a vault, but you can't get to it?


This is out of my area of study, so please be transparent with me; what do people who say the earth is round say to refute what you are saying about airplanes landing? They must have some science and math based answer to explain what you are saying is wrong. I doubt they just said that your theory, or whoevers theory it is, or what you say is fact, is a correct theory. They must have a answer to refute you. What is it? How do you deny their answer? What is your math and science and logic that proves them wrong when they say mathemactically this is why planes can land and why you are wrong?

Let's find out how the members here who believe the earth is a globe answer your question; I can't speak for them.

 

[posthuman]

______________________________

 

[posthuman]

Let's find out how the members here who believe the earth is a globe answer your question; I can't speak for them.

yoohoo!! been refuting your nonsense for 20+ pages, thanks.

and you've been unable to refute anything i said even once. you just ignore 99% of it.

you'll excuse me for not spending 300 hours going point-by point through every nonsense freemason video you post & repost. i can't be bothered to do that; this is total volunteer work.