W
I'm here too... One thing I've been questioning myself about is... ok here goes: As a woman I am not called to pastor or to instruct a man in biblical matters. Am I out of line to rebuke those who border on heresy with regards to the very foundation of our faith. I' m thinking perhaps because they are men that this is incorrect for me to be the one responding. Just something i've been throwing around. And if I am not called to speak against it why would I have such a strong reaction to it? (please dont say hormones lol). honestly would love some input on this.
I'm not sure why. Maybe it is just stubbornness? I love the universe and paleontology etc, and it sees so... disappointing if everything isn't older than 6-7 thousand years 8which would logically follow if the bible uses literal time that is running throughout it without leaps)
I can't see how stars can be that young
Well as for stars, and light and everything, notice that God made light on the first day, and didn't make the stars and sun until the fourth day. That may not make sense to some, that there was light before there were light sources. But consider this. If he just made the light sources on Day 1, then people would say "hey it takes thousands of years for the light from all those stars to reach the earth" (in other words for the stars to even be seen). So it actually makes more sense that he put all the light rays in place (stretched from the planned sources to the earth), and then made the light sources.
Anyway, it's no problem for God!![]()
And I consider the scripture account of creation a whole lot more trustworthy than the so-called science of the bandwagon of extremely biased atheist "scientists" who naturally want to suppress the truth of creation because it implies a Creator which implies that they are accountable and will be judged for their sin.
Well it is indeed a bandwagon, and I don't believe that most of them in the bandwagon are Christians.
I agree......Evilution is incompatible with a loving God.
Evilution is incompatible with a loving God.
Well, it's a scientifically accurate bandwagon, so I'd throw my chips in with the ones with evidence
In all seriousness, though, why can't the two ideas co-exist? Why can't G-d have used evolution as His means of creation?