You take up so much space to say nothing. That summarises your position very well.
Another runaway train statement put the brakes on brother it's fruitless the position demonstrated above.
I do NOT know what you are saying.
The difference is that Elijah knew GOD and knew he was called of GOD.
Yet you still do not even no my position.
I understand. You are saying I do not know God and are not called of God.
EG was saying Elijah sinned and could never walk blamelessly before the Lord.
His groups theology says legalism failed all the prophets and they did not please God.
It was only through Christ and the resurrection is true reconciliation found through faith for
past current and future sins. It is a dispensational view. It rejects we can truly walk
righteously today, or be blameless after God through Christ has done a good work in us.
Now you appear to be taking a different line. Now the Spirit I speak from is the Holy Spirit
working in my heart, for His glory. I wonder what your "true mantle" is.
It sounds like NAR type language. Rick Joyner and the mantle. Is this your group?
The theology EG is espousing in part is Joseph Prince and hyper grace.
Would not surprise me you have a different take on things.
The theology EG is espousing in part is Joseph Prince and hyper grace.
Would not surprise me you have a different take on things.
No...that really isn't what I was saying at all...
We are to work out our own salvation with fear and trembling, for it is GOD who worketh in us to will and to do HIS GOOD PLEASURE
But, "fear and trembling" I believe translate to humility and awe before HIM...aware of HIS HOLINESS and a desire to do what is right before HIM because of our love of HIM...
EG - you want to say I do not know your position. Well if you want to contribute it, please do.
No one is stopping you, it seems stupid to claim you are being miss-represented then not representing
yourself. You always say something like this and then do nothing, pretty meaningless.
Originally Posted by PeterJens![]()
![]()
You guys are so wise. We should not stand in judgement over each others lifestyles.
But we should confront real sin, because sin is what destroys lives and ones walk with Christ.
But are you actually saying sin does not matter, and righteousness just happens, like does a seed become a plant without water and sunlight?
Who. Who says this peter I read back over and over, and not one person made this claim. Are you talking to imaginary people Peter?
Originally Posted by PeterJens![]()
Thankyou for correcting me,
We all agree we should walk in righteousness, purity, blamelessly before the Lord, as Gods Holy redeemed people purchased to His glory.
I was a little confused with this analogy
A person could have love and kindness as a fruit in their life but be addicted to some pills or alcohol which they are continuing to struggle with in their life.
There is a lot of truth in sanctification takes time. If you have ever met addicted people, often the addiction hides deep emotional conflicts and unresolved hurts. Unless this is dealt with, unfortunately often the faith experience is just religion, and dies as the addiction takes hold and kills the person. So is trying to help in love now wrong? I wonder who puts this idea forward as sensible?
so you think we would just let this "addict" continue until he dies. with no love? With no discipline, With no counseling?
Why is it that you are so against trying to understand us peter?
got to agree with this
thanks!
on that note, work out our own salvation is something I think needs more 'work' with regards to being taught
I understand. You are saying I do not know God and are not called of God.
EG was saying Elijah sinned and could never walk blamelessly before the Lord.
His groups theology says legalism failed all the prophets and they did not please God.
It was only through Christ and the resurrection is true reconciliation found through faith for
past current and future sins. It is a dispensational view. It rejects we can truly walk
righteously today, or be blameless after God through Christ has done a good work in us.
Now you appear to be taking a different line. Now the Spirit I speak from is the Holy Spirit
working in my heart, for His glory. I wonder what your "true mantle" is.
It sounds like NAR type language. Rick Joyner and the mantle. Is this your group?
The theology EG is espousing in part is Joseph Prince and hyper grace.
Would not surprise me you have a different take on things.
What I have found in my life is through doing we are changed. I have always found it hard to understand we never stay in one place but are always moving on to something else, getting old, having new interactions etc.
Taught often means acedemic sitting down and learning the theory. Most of what I have learnt has been with and through others, and not theory, but often battling through to a new position. BDF is often a good example of this.
Though EG would never admit it, he does challenge a lot of approaches I have taken and taught me how to respond in love.
Trouble is often love is in the eye of the beholder. Any child when told off by a parent never thinks kindly towards the parent. I often feel like a child before EG the teacher, but that is his style, lol. "stop doing this, do that..."
EG provokes endless threads with no points just accusations.
Trouble is often love is in the eye of the beholder. Any child when told off by a parent never thinks kindly towards the parent. I often feel like a child before EG the teacher, but that is his style, lol. "stop doing this, do that..."
I'd really like to know what his church believes. I wonder if they have a website.
and in this corner we have eternally-grateful LOL!
debating team from high school?