Bernie or Bust?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Voldemort
  • Start date Start date
  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sirk said:
well then, if you are suspected of having ties to radical Islam, for your safety and others you shouldn't be able to buy a gun.
Click to expand...

I fixed it for you.

I could suspect you of having ties to radical Islam... it doesn't necessarily mean that you do... hand over your guns if you have any. =/
 
Maybe Trump should have said we should revisit and consider modifying the 14th amendment. The 14th was ratified when DEMOCRAT controlled southern states were denying citizenship to freed blacks. Maybe the 14th should be changed to say that you have to be born to atleast one parent on U.S. soil that is a citizen to be a citizen yourself.
 
Voldemort said:
You're correct. Anyone could be "suspected" of anything with little to no evidence supporting the suspicion.

In homicides cases, when a wife or girlfriend is murdered, it's protocol to have the husband/boyfriend brought in for question being their first suspect. This doesn't mean that 100% of the husbands/boyfriends actually did the murdering. We have a court of law that decides if a person truly did the crime or if they were merely suspected of the crime.

It astounds me how people use "suspected" and "convicted" interchangeably. As ridiculous as it is, even active shooters like the Dallas sniper, are called "suspects". He is a suspect until he is tried (or he is dead).
Click to expand...

You said it yourself, in this day and age, ESPECIALLY IN THIS PRESENT TIME, it is ridiculous. And many of these laws have to be looked at very closely.... in the meantime, I , personally, don't want any suspected killer to be allowed to be freely armed..... and many of these guys are already felons. This is not the day of one shooter having a single shot muzzle-loader.
 
Willie-T said:
You said it yourself, in this day and age, ESPECIALLY IN THIS PRESENT TIME, it is ridiculous. And many of these laws have to be looked at very closely.... in the meantime, I , personally, don't want any suspected killer to be allowed to be freely armed..... and many of these guys are already felons. This is not the day of one shooter having a single shot muzzle-loader.
Click to expand...

I fully understand this point of view, I even sort of agree to a large extent. However, if we are going strictly by the constitution, a person merely suspected of a crime is not enough to deny them their constitutionally guarantee rights.

We have to change the constitution or have a liberal Supreme Court "interpret" the constitution differently than the founding fathers wrote the right to bear arms.
 
Willie-T said:
There are nowhere near enough Bernie supporters to elect him over Hillary. We all know that. So, are you saying that since if his supporters did that, the democrat vote would be split, and Trump would be elected?

I just don't see Bernie wanting Trump in, so we both know he is never going to do that.

(Or, were you just hoping that Bernie would do that, and, thus, you must have been talking about yourself when you said "the old man is smarter than he lets on"? That bit was a little hard for me to follow.)
Click to expand...

It takes a while for old men to finally get it. lol
 
Voldemort said:
I fully understand this point of view, I even sort of agree to a large extent. However, if we are going strictly by the constitution, a person merely suspected of a crime is not enough to deny them their constitutionally guarantee rights.

We have to change the constitution or have a liberal Supreme Court "interpret" the constitution differently than the founding fathers wrote the right to bear arms.
Click to expand...

I'm voting for Trump cause I don't want Hillary nominating the next justice to the supreme court.
 
There are so many things that would be neat to see if true experts in ALL field were appointed.... and their advice, heeded.

BTW, Harold was conceived right about the day I was born.
 
Last edited:
We are on the verge of having our natural rights that were enumerated in the constitution severely chilled if not taken away completely. One supreme court justice away from disaster. If I'm not mistaken, Trump has already put out a list of nominees that are very much constitutionalist. That is the big message the Republicans need to get out.
 
Tommy379 said:
We are on the verge of having our natural rights that were enumerated in the constitution severely chilled if not taken away completely. One supreme court justice away from disaster. If I'm not mistaken, Trump has already put out a list of nominees that are very much constitutionalist. That is the big message the Republicans need to get out.
Click to expand...

Yep, 11 of them, and they were all well received.

The list: https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-...of-names-of-potential-united-states-supreme-c
 
Last edited:
Sirk said:
The fact is rachel, we need to weed out those who adhere to radical islam...and if a muslim is offended that they are looked at with a weary eye because of the religion they ascribe to...too bad, they should be understanding and sensitive to that, because...well....radical islamists like to murder us and we need to find out who they are. I don't even trust white people until I get to know them Lol. Are you as suicidal as the left wing appears to be?
Click to expand...

the republicans did not dismiss strict adherence to the constitution as 'suicidal' until trump showed up and told them america would need to do 'unthinkable' things to stay safe...
 
Sirk said:
It's ludicrous to assert that a pregnant canadian woman out combining her field, goes into labor, drives thru a fence and gives birth to a US citizen 15 ft inside our border.
Click to expand...

no more ludicrous than insisting that a person who has never set foot on mexican soil is a mexican national...
 
popeye said:
Hillary;"we are against evrything Trump and pence are for"

What does that tell you?

Hillary is just 4 more years of Obama's destruction of America.

You like promoting Homosexuals,transvestites,pediphiles,comunists,and destroying the economy and defense?

Then vote hillary.

Oh,and stirring the racial pot,and the class envy pot,and the ever successful VICTIM POT. Yes we need those things and she will surely give us an even more diverse (transvestite,gay,lesbian) staffed white house.

TURN ON THE RAINBOW LIGHTS HILLARY!!!!
Click to expand...

don't look now but trump had his openly gay convention speaker dismissing most of the social issues you mentioned as 'distractions'...
 
Tommy379 said:
Maybe Trump should have said we should revisit and consider modifying the 14th amendment. The 14th was ratified when DEMOCRAT controlled southern states were denying citizenship to freed blacks. Maybe the 14th should be changed to say that you have to be born to atleast one parent on U.S. soil that is a citizen to be a citizen yourself.
Click to expand...

amending the constitution to modify the fourteenth amendment would be the constitutional approach to addressing this issue...

but to do as trump promises to do and simply ignore the constitution because it doesn't say what he wishes it said would be unconstitutional...

but while we are talking about an amendment to modify the fourteenth amendment...i would argue that being born to american citizen parents should not automatically make you a citizen if you spend all of your formative years outside of the united states...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back