Dangers of Gender Neutral Bathrooms
- Thread starter Silverwings
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Moral relativism is perhaps the pinnacle goal of the globalists. Why? Because if you can convince an entire society that their inherent conscience should be ignored and that their inborn feelings of morality are “open to interpretation,” then eventually any evil action can be rationalized. When evil becomes “good,” and good becomes evil, evil men will reign supreme.
To one who is incapable of understanding something as elementary as a woman's right to a public washroom without the presence of men, there remains no such thing as a "substantive" rebuttal. The topic was and is gender neutral public washrooms. Argue away that I and others must be "okay with pedophiles sharing restrooms with little boys". Chances are and common sense dictates that those insisting on a woman's right to dignity would all the more have genuine concern for their children. A mother accompanying her little girl to a public washroom or a father doing the same with his young son negates any risk from a pedophiliac deviant. But you already know this. You argue for other reasons that remain your issue. And that's where they will stay.
V
I think her argument was that a parent could use their child, or a child, as means to prey upon other children.
Kim, correct me if I'm wrong, you don't sincerely advocate for this do you? You are just using this to make a point that if people genuinely believe restrooms are infested with predators, why ignore the children and have restrooms open to pedophiles?
Kim, correct me if I'm wrong, you don't sincerely advocate for this do you? You are just using this to make a point that if people genuinely believe restrooms are infested with predators, why ignore the children and have restrooms open to pedophiles?
K
You understand perfectly. Then again, I know onefloewover understands too but he is just playing dumb.
He advocates for a law, but says it doesn't need to be enforced, just charge people who break the law.... but makes no mention of how one will be caught breaking the law. lol
And yes, he is ignoring the point I make about parents or people who use children as a means to go into the restroom to molest children. If he feels there is an "infestation" of perverted men, he should not allow any men (including parents) to go into the restrooms where little boys might be.
He advocates for a law, but says it doesn't need to be enforced, just charge people who break the law.... but makes no mention of how one will be caught breaking the law. lol
And yes, he is ignoring the point I make about parents or people who use children as a means to go into the restroom to molest children. If he feels there is an "infestation" of perverted men, he should not allow any men (including parents) to go into the restrooms where little boys might be.
K
It's so "elementary" that you need to fight for a law to be made to grant this particular right? Obviously it's not as elementary as you're making it out to be. lol
In states that don't have a law explicitly allowing or forbidding a gender from going into the opposite gender restroom, there is no such "elementary right". A genetic male can go into a women's restroom legally, but if asked to leave, they have to leave. But you ignored my other question of how one knows, in this day and age, what someone has in between their legs without actually looking at it... Maybe 70+ years ago it wasn't an issue... but this isn't the 1940's anymore.
In states that don't have a law explicitly allowing or forbidding a gender from going into the opposite gender restroom, there is no such "elementary right". A genetic male can go into a women's restroom legally, but if asked to leave, they have to leave. But you ignored my other question of how one knows, in this day and age, what someone has in between their legs without actually looking at it... Maybe 70+ years ago it wasn't an issue... but this isn't the 1940's anymore.
V
If history teaches us anything, we know that with more legislation, the government exercises his authority and dominion over it's people. It wasn't intended to be this way, but it is reality. Just look at the Patriot Act.
So while the picture you posted is comical, it could potentially be a reality if there is a law forbidding one genetic gender from entering the gendered restroom they identify with. Governments are entitled to enforce the laws they make.
The best course of action, in my opinion, is to not make a law restricting or allowing anyone from the restroom, but prosecute people who break other aspects of the law (molesting, video recording, etc...).
So while the picture you posted is comical, it could potentially be a reality if there is a law forbidding one genetic gender from entering the gendered restroom they identify with. Governments are entitled to enforce the laws they make.
The best course of action, in my opinion, is to not make a law restricting or allowing anyone from the restroom, but prosecute people who break other aspects of the law (molesting, video recording, etc...).
I believe opening up a woman's public washroom to men will create a dynamic that is ripe for abuse. And for anyone to suggest otherwise is to choose to ignore the practical application that is sure to follow. Young men at the malls following in after young girls ... older men with degenerate hearts seeking to please their sinful and deviant desires etc. etc. ... whatever the case may be. What is elementary in all of this is choosing to ignore the fallen state of mankind in general. Why make things easier for those few that will surely take advantage of it ? If, as Kim says, we have all likely been in a public washroom with one of the opposite gender being unaware, why is it now necessary for them to make it a "legal" matter ? Personally, I couldn't care less if gov't were to regulate a LGBT washroom in all public area's. I'd simply not use them. My only area of concern is for women losing their rights to the dignity of privacy on such a delicate matter. It seems to me a selfish endeavour for those few to insist on placing all women (and young girls) in a precarious position for something they've already been doing all along anyways, as Kim has previously stated. Bringing children into the equation is to detract from the issue of gender. Liberal thinkers have mastered this art of deception. It is the parents God-given duty to watch over their own in delicate matters like this. Suggesting that strange men should be allowed to walk in on a young mother helping her young daughter in a public washroom is beyond disgusting. But there remains those few who would happily reduce societal moral decency to it's lowest common denominator for the sake of their own cause. It's not fairness they seek. It is acceptance ... at the peril of whoever gets in their way. Give them their universal washrooms. Who cares ? But never allow men access to what should always remain a woman's private matter. As for the transgendered accessing washrooms that we'd never recognize, what we don't know won't hurt us. Few and far between. Gov't can't regulate everything and/or what it doesn't see or know. And I'm not suggesting that they should.
