the trouble we're in

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
J

jennymae

Guest
#21
And using the word "deceived" furthers the debate? I disagree with that assessment. How can you have an honest debate with someone who says you are deceived? Sounds more like a conclusion than a opinion to me. I won't argue about it anymore....I'll just report it. Getting a little tired of the folks here who use that kind of "debating".
Why can't you just say you disagree without adding a negative spin?:)
 

Sirk

Banned
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
113
0
#22
And using the word "deceived" furthers the debate? I disagree with that assessment. How can you have an honest debate with someone who says you are deceived? Sounds more like a conclusion than a opinion to me. I won't argue about it anymore....I'll just report it. Getting a little tired of the folks here who use that kind of "debating".
Why can't you just say you disagree without adding a negative spin?:)
I used an honest debate tactic to counter your dishonest one. I pointed out the error in the logic you are using to discredit people who support trump...which is by calling them deceived. You can't bring facts but only bring innuendo. Others bring in Hitler or say they are friends of darkness or whatever. It's old and has run it's course. When I see it I'll call it out and or report it. Maybe you can learn something about being intellectually honest.
 
J

jennymae

Guest
#23
If that is your honest debate tactic, I'd rather not encounter your dishonest debate tactic. You are a grown man playing the victim? How honest is that?
 

Sirk

Banned
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
113
0
#24
If that is your honest debate tactic, I'd rather not encounter your dishonest debate tactic. You are a grown man playing the victim? How honest is that?
Lemme get this straight....you can call me deceived and thats ok...but I can't point out the glaring intellectual dishonesty that kind of argument is? I'll just report you instead.
 
C

CharlieGrown

Guest
#25
Lemme get this straight....you can call me deceived and thats ok...but I can't point out the glaring intellectual dishonesty that kind of argument is? I'll just report you instead.
Sounds like an object lesson in liberal "Arts".
 

Sirk

Banned
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
113
0
#26
Sounds like an object lesson in liberal "Arts".
Maybe people should have to earn a pass to comment in the news section by proving they actually have a viable perspective about world affairs. Lol
 
J

jennymae

Guest
#27
Maybe people should have to earn a pass to comment in the news section by proving they actually have a viable perspective about world affairs. Lol
According to your logics this post should be reported:p.
 

Sirk

Banned
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
113
0
#28
According to your logics this post should be reported:p.
Maybe...but I didn't call you a name....such as deceived. I attacked your argument and not your personhood.
 
J

jennymae

Guest
#29
Sounds like an object lesson in liberal "Arts".
For your information, sir, I am a conservative. Just because I'm not supporting a candidate that is clearly liberal, that doesn't mean I'm a liberal. Why not concentrate on the senate instead of making witty comments and be supporting a liberal like Trump?:p
 

Tommy379

Notorious Member
Jan 12, 2016
7,589
1,153
113
#30
The supreme court.
 

Sirk

Banned
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
113
0
#31
For your information, sir, I am a conservative. Just because I'm not supporting a candidate that is clearly liberal, that doesn't mean I'm a liberal. Why not concentrate on the senate instead of making witty comments and be supporting a liberal like Trump?:p
We need a went right over your head meme. Lol
 

zeroturbulence

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2009
24,643
4,304
113
#32
Trump is a liberal? Well then someone needs to tell all the liberals out there right now so they can vote for him!! :rolleyes:
 
J

jennymae

Guest
#33
Maybe...but I didn't call you a name....such as deceived. I attacked your argument and not your personhood.
You called me dishonest, said what I was really saying was children of s....and...I didn't call you no name, sir, no way I wasn't, you just jumped on something I said which had nothing to do with you. You made my post a part of something you didn't need to.
 
C

CharlieGrown

Guest
#34
You called me dishonest, said what I was really saying was children of s....and...I didn't call you no name, sir, no way I wasn't, you just jumped on something I said which had nothing to do with you. You made my post a part of something you didn't need to.
Here's what is causing confusion, if you are anti-Trump you must be pro-Hillary because they are the only two horses in this race. Any other vote is a waste of time. So jennymae who are you voting for if you don't mind the question?
 
J

jennymae

Guest
#36
Here's what is causing confusion, if you are anti-Trump you must be pro-Hillary because they are the only two horses in this race. Any other vote is a waste of time. So jennymae who are you voting for if you don't mind the question?
I'm doing a write in:)
 
J

jennymae

Guest
#38
OK, then is it safe to say your write in candidate will be losing the election?
I think it is safe to say that I despise the two candidates so much that I can't vote for neither of them.
 

Sirk

Banned
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
113
0
#39
You called me dishonest, said what I was really saying was children of s....and...I didn't call you no name, sir, no way I wasn't, you just jumped on something I said which had nothing to do with you. You made my post a part of something you didn't need to.
I called your argument intellectually dishonest...saying that I am deceived. Saying that I am deceived is judging me more critically than you judge yourself and it is a pretty self serving way to converse about a topic. I have not attacked you personally...which is what you did by calling me deceived....you may as well have said I serve satan. It's an inflammatory word that tears another down to serve yourself.
I'll be surprised if you keep using it after this. Lol
 
J

jennymae

Guest
#40
I called your argument intellectually dishonest...saying that I am deceived. Saying that I am deceived is judging me more critically than you judge yourself and it is a pretty self serving way to converse about a topic. I have not attacked you personally...which is what you did by calling me deceived....you may as well have said I serve satan. It's an inflammatory word that tears another down to serve yourself.
I'll be surprised if you keep using it after this. Lol
What are you talking about? You thought I was talking to you in that post? Oh lol, now I get it;) It was a response to the OP. I had to go back and see why you were so mad about what I was saying to the OP. Lol, I didn't even read your post before now.