Trump: Lies or Just Stupid?

[Sirk]

But yet a sodomite or a raper apologist being in there is just fine.....ooookay there peaceguy....whatever you say. Lol

 

[Sirk]

Thought so. You just don't have the integrity to back up your words with action.
By contrast, I am perfectly willing to back up mine.

What...that you get paid to troll conservative internet sites? I still think you do. You have the MO.

 

[PrynceNY]

Click on Coulter's own website for all the proof you need. She has been quoted quite extensively and her racism and hate is well established. No, this may not comport with your politically correct slant, but it is the truth.

You still haven't answered the question why you a person who "attended law school" support a criminal. That's just like when the FBI who were suppose to uphold the law they decided to cover for her crimes

 

[peacenik]

But yet a sodomite or a raper apologist being in there is just fine.....ooookay there peaceguy....whatever you say. Lol

Lawsuits against your hero Trump for those reasons are still pending. So how can you defend that?

Ooops, never mind - I know why ...

 

[Sirk]

Lawsuits against your hero Trump for those reasons are still pending. So how can you defend that?

Ooops, never mind - I know why ...

anyone can sue anyone for anything in this backwards land we live in.

 

[peacenik]

You still haven't answered the question why you a person who "attended law school" support a criminal. That's just like when the FBI who were suppose to uphold the law they decided to cover for her crimes

You posed your query in the form of a leading question which is lacking in substantive matter:

First, you must define who is the criminal and post evidence of a conviction. Second, you must prove that I am defending a criminal. Third, you must define and illustrate how this "criminal" fails to live up to the remedial social corrections imposed upon conviction.


Upon completing these requirements, then you may re-pose the question in an objective and non-leading manner.

 

[Sirk]

In other words.....blah blah blah....Hillary is great. Lol

 

[PrynceNY]

You posed your query in the form of a leading question which is lacking in substantive matter: First, you must define who is the criminal and post evidence of a conviction. Second, you must prove that I am defending a criminal. Third, you must define and illustrate how this "criminal" fails to live up to the remedial social corrections imposed upon conviction. Upon completing these requirements, then you may re-pose the question in an objective and non-leading manner.

It just amazes me how a person who proclaims they went to law school. A person who follows Gods commandments / laws. Yet supports one of the wickedess women in america who has no regard for law. I'm sure Jesus is probably scratching his head.

 

[Sirk]

It just amazes me how a person who proclaims they went to law school. A person who follows Gods commandments / laws. Yet supports one of the wickedess women in america who has no regard for law. I'm sure Jesus is probably scratching his head.

The guy is obviously just an agitator. No one is this touched in the head. I don't even think Hillary would believe this guy. Lol

 

[Tommy379]

You still haven't answered the question why you a person who "attended law school" support a criminal. That's just like when the FBI who were suppose to uphold the law they decided to cover for her crimes

I object to this point. The director of the FBI laid out every crime Hillary committed on a televised speech and congressional inquiry. The director was simply ordered by political appointee, Loretta Lynch, to conclude his speech by saying the case couldn't be prosecuted so Lynch wouldn't have to. Of course we all know that any other person would have been prosecuted under the same facts and circumstances.

 

[peacenik]

It just amazes me how a person who proclaims they went to law school. A person who follows Gods commandments / laws. Yet supports one of the wickedess women in america who has no regard for law. I'm sure Jesus is probably scratching his head.

While I try to refrain from being judgmental, I cannot help but succumb to my amazement as to how anyone can defend a hater like Trump who expresses such hatred for minorities and women. All the while he [now] calls himself a Christian when he previously disregarded all such things. This is hypocrisy and Pharisaim of the worse kind.

Jesus [that great Jewish liberal whom so many of you claim to worship] would likely be scratching his head more at you people than anyone else.

 

[Sirk]

While I try to refrain from being judgmental, I cannot help but succumb to my amazement as to how anyone can defend a hater like Trump who expresses such hatred for minorities and women. All the while he [now] calls himself a Christian when he previously disregarded all such things. This is hypocrisy and Pharisaim of the worse kind.

Jesus [that great Jewish liberal whom so many of you claim to worship] would likely be scratching his head more at you people than anyone else.

He's actually done the opposite of what you say here for people....Donald Trump is color blind but has 20/20 vision for stupidity.

 

[peacenik]

I object to this point. The director of the FBI laid out every crime Hillary committed on a televised speech and congressional inquiry. The director was simply ordered by political appointee, Loretta Lynch, to conclude his speech by saying the case couldn't be prosecuted so Lynch wouldn't have to. Of course we all know that any other person would have been prosecuted under the same facts and circumstances.

Then file a lawsuit against Hillary.
Standing may be found on the basis that you are an aggrieved taxpayer - palpable injury resulting her "crimes" which caused you grievous emotional distress, the heart break of psoriasis, and general lassitude - remedy to be found by a court's depositing Hillary in a jail which will immunize society from her wiles and other evils.
Below is a site for you to commence your legal petition:

Criminal Forms | United States Courts

 

[peacenik]

The guy is obviously just an agitator. No one is this touched in the head. I don't even think Hillary would believe this guy. Lol

projecting - and losing - again

so predictable!

 

[Tommy379]

Then file a lawsuit against Hillary.
Standing may be found on the basis that you are an aggrieved taxpayer - palpable injury resulting her "crimes" which caused you grievous emotional distress, the heart break of psoriasis, and general lassitude - remedy to be found by a court's depositing Hillary in a jail which will immunize society from her wiles and other evils.
Below is a site for you to commence your legal petition:

Criminal Forms | United States Courts

Maybe I'll just petition for a special grand jury. Of course the judge would deny it on a motion from the US attorney.

 

[peacenik]

Maybe I'll just petition for a special grand jury. Of course the judge would deny it on a motion from the US attorney.

The majority of judges in the USA are Republican so you should have no trouble finding one who is politically ambitious and will gladly grant a hearing.

 

[PrynceNY]

While I try to refrain from being judgmental, I cannot help but succumb to my amazement as to how anyone can defend a hater like Trump who expresses such hatred for minorities and women. All the while he [now] calls himself a Christian when he previously disregarded all such things. This is hypocrisy and Pharisaim of the worse kind. Jesus [that great Jewish liberal whom so many of you claim to worship] would likely be scratching his head more at you people than anyone else.

Lets see hillary insulted catholics, evangelicals, latinos, blacks & ect. She breaks law after law & lies in your face while you supporters cheer aimlessly. Many times the Lord said do not be deceived apparently some haven't heed his word.

 

[peacenik]

She breaks law after law & lies in your face while you supporters cheer aimlessly.

Still waiting for proof.

 

[Sirk]

The majority of judges in the USA are Republican so you should have no trouble finding one who is politically ambitious and will gladly grant a hearing.

This is a very big lie. The majority of Federally appointed judges in the US are democrat appointees. You do just make this stuff up don't you?

 

[Tommy379]

The majority of judges in the USA are Republican so you should have no trouble finding one who is politically ambitious and will gladly grant a hearing.

I doubt it. We got pretty far right circuit judges here that will deny the petition if the commonwealth attorney says they won't prosecute the case. Now if you could find a member of the bar to step forward and say they will prosecute, that might be a different matter. Federal courts might operate different.