I got two A's and two B's after really thinking i was not even going to be able to finish because of my neck being so bad... 3.50 GPA not great but I hope to raise it next semester.
2.75 GPA, and that only because I took another course after I graduated. 3.5 is a WOW!!!!I got two A's and two B's after really thinking i was not even going to be able to finish because of my neck being so bad... 3.50 GPA not great but I hope to raise it next semester.
We don't get a GPA, just grades for every subject.
here we add together all grades and then devide that by the number of subjects
Interesting, what if someone is brilliant at maths and gets a top grade but rubbish at art
and gets a bottom grade?
Would the lower overall average stop someone getting a job.
Just curious as in the UK each subject is graded independently.
Some jobs or university's specifically want good grades in certain subjects
but they would not bother if you failed in others.
But our grades are A, B, C , D, E so how does that work?
So you could be Stephen Hawking, good at maths and science, but useless at history, english and art, and get a terrible score? That doesn't make any sense.
Interesting, what if someone is brilliant at maths and gets a top grade but rubbish at art
and gets a bottom grade?
Would the lower overall average stop someone getting a job.
Just curious as in the UK each subject is graded independently.
Some jobs or university's specifically want good grades in certain subjects
but they would not bother if you failed in others.
Ok I get that Demi, but Hawking is a genius and your system now has him down as average? So I am saying that taking a mean of all subjects just rewards all-rounders, not brilliance. For instance, I am USELESS at maths and science, but I get good marks in english, history, geography and religious studies, and ok in French and Latin (amazingly). But I bet my GPA would be average or just below.
I suck at math AND art..lol
And I am bottom of my class! See why I hate my life!