Prophesying is not a sign
The NASB translations I Corinthians 14:22 as follows:
"So then tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers; but prophecy is for a sign, not to unbelievers but to those who believe"
Some prophecies are signs. One type of sign is a predictive prophecy.
Signs are for those who believe not.
In Matthew 24, the disciples ask Jesus for the sign of His coming and of the end of the age, and Jesus gives them a number of signs.
So signs are not only for them that believe not. I've pointed this types of things out to you over and over again. Yet you still keep writing these types of things.
if we receive honor (venerate) one of another edifying each other
I suggest you do a word study on the 'edification' so you can understand what it means. You seem to be confusing veneration and building up.
He that speaks in an unknown tongue edifieth himself. There is no approval to that act of self-righteousness.
Paul does not call this self-righteousness. The Bible does not call self-edification self-righteousness. Those are two different concepts. Equating them doesn't make sense.
And in the passage, speaking in tongues is good. If you speak in tongues, you edify yourself. But Paul would rather have you prophecy or interpret. In the passage, speaking in tongues-- by which you edify yourself is good. Prophesying or speaking in tongues with interpretation is better, because you edify others.
3 But one who prophesies speaks to men for edification and exhortation and consolation. 4 One who speaks in a tongue edifies himself; but one who prophesies edifies the church. 5 Now I wish that you all spoke in tongues, but even more that you would prophesy; and greater is one who prophesies than one who speaks in tongues, unless he interprets, so that the church may receive edifying. (NASB)
Your trying to make speaking in tongues out to be bad doesn't match with the flow of argument Paul is making in the text.
Paul says that he who speaks in tongues edifies himself. He wishes that you all spoke with tongues. Paul wishes that we would all edify ourselves through speaking in tongues.
Paul says that he who prophesies edifies the church. He'd rather have us prophesy than speak in tongues (or speak in tongues and interpret), so that the church might receive edifying.
Edifying yourself is something good. Paul is in favor of it. Edifying the church is better. Paul is more in favor of that.
Again, lets stick with the text.
I notice on this topic that you use a lot of religious and Biblical words and phrases to argue for ideas that the Bible does not teach, in some cases, ideas that contradict scriptures.
The church does not edify the church as if the kingdom of God was of this world or ever could be.
You should get a concordance or use an online tool like BlueLetterBible. Look up cases where 'edify', 'edication', etc. are used. It might also help to look up 'edify' in an English dictionary or a dual language dictionary with whatever you native language is. The word translated 'edify' can also be translated 'build up.' In the Bible, individual members of the body can build up the church with their spiritual gifts.
That does not make the kingdom of God of this world.
No such thing as self-edification by doing a work as an outward sign. They have already received their reward according to the outward sign.
More religious words and phrases, phrases from the Bible strung together to communicate a confusing message the Bible does not say.
The edifying (God building up) comes after the interpretation of prophecy, the bible. No prophecy no interpretation.no edification of the church.
Those aren't the only gifts that edify. Teaching also edifies. Paul treats teaching and prophesying as separate gifts. Those who prophesy operate in a revelatory gift. Teachers often explain what was revealed through revelation in the past. The gifts of the Spirit work through people. The Holy Spirit works through people, through the gifts of the Spirit, to edify others.
Peter never performed the miracle as if we could glory in the flesh . We walk by faith not by sight.
Paul did perform miracles. What does Paul performing miracles have to do with the idea of us glorifying in the flesh? What do you mean? What does this line of reasoning have to do with walking by faith and not by sight?
He wavered between the imagination of his own heart and the faith of Christ that worked in him .It was not Peter’s faith that suspended the law of gravity. When Peter heard the words of faith it is God who changed the law of gravity. (Peter come) No such thing as a sign of self-edification.
Sign of self-edification? What does that mean? Maybe you have your own private definition of self-edification.
Peter walked on water by the power of God. He was able to do so when he believed. The miracle Peter did was something physical that happened. It is wrong to think that if someone does a miracle that effects physical reality that he must be walking by sight. When Peter walked by faith, he could do the miracle. When he went by what he saw, he began to sink.
The walking by faith and not by sight doctrine had to do with those who were faithless and required a sign before they world believe.
Where do you get this idea about requiring a sign from the passage in II Corinthians which talks about walking by faith and not by sight? What is your 'walking by faith and not by sight doctrine' and where do you get it from the Bible?
There were those who would not believe unless they did a sign. God did great wonders in Egypt before people who were slow to believe. When God stretched out His hand on Egypt, the Egyptians knew that He was the Lord. God split the Red Sea through Moses. Jesus did great signs and wonders among the people, too, even though some of them would not believe without seeing a sign and wonder.
The cross, the faith issue was their stumbling block. The Jew used the ceremonial laws (shadows) as their experiences walking by sight in lieu of that work of self-edification.
It almost looks like you are using self-edification in a positive sense, here.
Because they required a sign before they could believe, being comfortable in their own Jewish flesh as those who worked to bring the ceremonial laws that pointed ahead to the unseen glory. Christ informed them as below.
This looks like a list of nearly random stream-of-consciousness, disjointed theological concepts strung together somehow in one sentence. It kind of looks like the result of playing some sort of theology MadLibs game. You'd need to explain this in detail if you want someone us to get what you are trying to say.
