Willie, I need to roll.
Have fun in your thread.
And I can't speak for anyone else, but if you will give sources for your quotes, I'll will try to be fair about what you draw from them.
I always prefer sourced to be quoted.
Sometimes knowing the source helps us to do things like DEFINE TERMS before we start discussion...
as the author may have very different definitions of things.
You and I are not deconstructionists in the literary sense, so I think we both want to know what the author actually meant, and how he was using certain words.
That's all.
I get suspicious when sources are not given.
But if you do that, I'll try to be fair about it.
Have fun in your thread.
And I can't speak for anyone else, but if you will give sources for your quotes, I'll will try to be fair about what you draw from them.
I always prefer sourced to be quoted.
Sometimes knowing the source helps us to do things like DEFINE TERMS before we start discussion...
as the author may have very different definitions of things.
You and I are not deconstructionists in the literary sense, so I think we both want to know what the author actually meant, and how he was using certain words.
That's all.
I get suspicious when sources are not given.
But if you do that, I'll try to be fair about it.
I did not ask anyone to embrace a theology. BUT I do hope this ridiculous conversation has gotten some of the thinkers here to realize that they may not only be ignoring GOOD things people they are supposed to hate say, but that they might also be swallowing some things the people they are suppose to idolize are selling as God's word.
Both 777 and I have often said that there are numerous things Joseph Prince believes that we totally disagree with, but ................... We can distinguish the meat from the bones in just about anyone's teaching. People, we should not have to be told who we can listen to, and who we can't.