Is this an attempt at defining legalism? To me it is completely unclear.
It appears to me to be defining trying to follow morality without Christ.
Is this your intention?
ahh...and he always thinks you are saying the exact opposite! Gaah!
Is this an attempt at defining legalism? To me it is completely unclear.
It appears to me to be defining trying to follow morality without Christ.
Is this your intention?
That's why jesus said LOVE is what fulfills the law.
ahh...and he always thinks you are saying the exact opposite! Gaah!
No , not legalistic.
It's confusing for sure.
What happens in some people's minds is this:
Someone makes the statement:
"What a beautiful blue sky the Lord gave us today."
Someone else responds back to the above statement:
"What? The sky is not green- everyone knows that the sky is blue ."
When people have this kind of a mindset - it is impossible to have any kind of a rational discussion with them as they continually "see" something else than what is actually said. They then proceed to talk as if this "made-up thought" is real.
Anyway - I just ignore those types of posts now. No harm done...
Back to the OP and legalism - the final frontier for the body of Christ is the battle of grace verses legalism. Two different worlds although they can look alike outwardly. I believe that is the deceptive part so it is good to talk about it..
How does love fulfill the law? It is easy to say the words, because Paul and John
talk about this. But what do they mean?
If I feel gooy about my neighbour, I am now righteous?
If I love their car, and get them to give me a lift in it, one step closer to owning it.
How does this fulfill the law?
I asked this because one can end up defining legalism, and Jesus is pushing things further.
The danger is always going from a healthy understanding of boundaries into continual self
condemnation. Take a simple idea. I think of someone who is beautiful. Appreciation of
various attributes arises. Now that could be called lust, or acknowledging my response to
them. Now dwelling on this emotion and using fantasy, now that is lust.
Some have a very imaginative mind, find themselves dreaming about individuals.
A cycle of condemnation and failure can then result, with suppression etc.
Rather than seeking help, they get eaten up, and leave the faith, or get so sensitive
about emotional reactions, refuse any contact with the opposite sex.
So a concept of purity is like poison, that triggers condemnation, guilt, and rejection.
So lock it all away, and hope it stays hidden. So addictions prosper, because honesty and
discussion is too dangerous, because the image is everything, and victory or balance is
no longer an issue of faith, it is just our little secret.
Legalism creates this environment, where truth of our fallen nature and lostness cannot
see the light of day.
Legalism is any system in which a person seeks to gain God's acceptance or blessings by what he does. Any approach to Christian living that focuses on keeping rules as a means of experiencing victory or growing spiritually is legalism.
"Any approach" is all embracing.
Nope.So if a believer finds they have sinned, and repent and confess
the sin, and get right with the Lord, this phrase above implies this is wrong.
Is that the correct meaning being implied here?
"Any approach" is all embracing. So if a believer finds they have sinned, and repent and confess
the sin, and get right with the Lord, this phrase above implies this is wrong.
Is that the correct meaning being implied here?
Can one truly born again, baptized in Holy Spirit, be religious?
Can one truly born again, baptized in Holy Spirit, be religious?
In my experience, not very often. Or, at least, not very long.Can one truly born again, baptized in Holy Spirit, be religious?
Define religious. How do you define that word?![]()
In my experience, not very often. Or, at least, not very long.