Morning tanakh,
Your continuing error, is that you are not taking into consideration the other aspects of end-time events, namely, the wrath of God. You claim that there is only "one second coming" and you are correct. Jesus will return to the earth to end the age and establish his millennial kingdom and fulfill the prophecy of ruling from Jerusalem and sitting on the throne of David. That said, scripture is clear that this event will take place only after seals, trumpets and bowl judgments have taken place, which is the wrath of God.
The gathering of the church on the other hand, is a completely separate event from the Lord's return to end the age. Scripture states--and this is what you are not incorporating into your exegesis--is that believers are not appointed to suffer God's coming wrath, which again, must take place prior to Jesus returning to the earth. God's coming wrath is not to be confused with the trials and tribulations that Jesus and the apostles said that believers would have. It will be an unprecedented time "the day of the Lord" which the OT prophets and the apostles prophesied of, bringing this age to an end.
You have also not taken into consideration that army riding on white horses who are following Christ out of heaven in Rev.19:14. In Rev.19:6-8, we see the bride/church receiving her fine linen, white and clean and then in Rev.19:14, we see this army mentioned as wearing the same clothing, demonstrating that the bride who previously received the bright clothing, is that army seen wearing that same clothing and riding on the white horses following Christ out of heaven. If they are following Christ out of heaven, then they would have already had to be in heaven.
For anyone who would try to assign this army on white horses as being angels, we have other scripture that identifies those who are returning with Christ, which according to Rev.17:14, will be His "called, chosen and faithful followers." That designation cannot be referring to angels, but to those who will have previously been resurrected and are returning with Christ to the earth to end the age. You are simply not performing a thorough exegesis, as you are not taking into consideration this other information. If you had, then you would be coming to the same conclusion that I arrived at.
If the church was to go through God's wrath, then it would be a dishonor to Jesus, because he experienced God's wrath for every believer and thereby satisfying it. 1 Thes.1:10 tells us that Jesus rescues us from the coming wrath:
"They tell how you turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God, and to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead—Jesus, who rescues us from the coming wrath."
God did not appoint us to suffer wrath:
"But since we belong to the day, let us be sober, putting on faith and love as a breastplate, and the hope of salvation as a helmet. For God did not appoint us to suffer wrath but to receive salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ."
Another on-going problem is that, people do not understand the severity and magnitude of God's coming wrath. These events of plagues will be like nothing that has ever taken place upon the earth. The result being the majority of the earth's population being decimated and all human government dismantled. If the church were here, it would be exposed to all of the same events of wrath that the wicked will be experiencing and that because it will affect the entire earth.
Another issue that you stop short of in your exegesis--and as I continue to point out--is one of God's clues in the book of Revelation, which that from Revelation 1 thru 3, only the word Ekklesia translated church is used within those chapters. You will not find the word Hagios transled as Saints anywhere in those first three chapters. Likewise, from Rev.4 onward and beginning at 5:8, the Holy Spirit abruptly stopped using the word Eklesia/church and all believers from that point on are referred to as Hagios/Saints. The read never sees the word Ekklesia/church again, until Rev.22:16.
It is not by coincidence that the Holy Spirit switched from Ekklesia to Hagios. And the Hagios that he is referring to are introduced in Rev.7:9-17. As I have said many times, the very fact that the elder is asking John "who are these in white robes and where did they come from" tells you that this group is not the church. John tells the elder that he doesn't know who they are and the elder tells him "These are those who have come out of the great tribulation." This group are those who will have come to Christ after the church has been gathered and during the time period of God's wrath.
With all due respect tanakh, you are not performing a thorough exegesis when it comes to end-time events and which is the also the same problem for many.
The gathering of the Church is when Christ descends from heaven bringing with him the spirits/souls of those who will have died in Christ from the on-set of the church right up to the resurrection and who will then be reunited with those resurrected bodies. Immediately following that, the living in Christ will be changed into their immortal and glorified bodies and will be caught up with them to meet the Lord in air. At that time John 14:1-3 the promise of the Lord will be fulfilled when He takes the entire church back to the Father's house to those mansions/rooms/dwelling places that went to prepare for us, that where he is we may be also.
In keeping with the scriptures, this exegesis keeps the church from going through God's wrath and it also provides time for the bride/church to receive her fine linen in heaven, white and clean, at the wedding of the Lamb. And it also satisfies the scripture for the bride/church to be able to follow Christ out of heaven in Rev.19:11-21.
With all due respect, your exegesis is incomplete. Until you recognize these things, your interpretation will always be in error.