RE: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

[Magenta]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

Nay I did not claim he was dishonest. I said that he falsely accused me of being dishonest. The accusation is false because I am not being dishonest. And so the reasoning of me asking what he believe is my point of view, so that I may clarify for him.

Now you have said he has a proclivity to promiscuity. Why do you say that?

Well if I have falsely accused him of something, according to you I am being honest so what is your complaint, exactly?

 

[Chokmahiel]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

Well if I have falsely accused him of something, according to you I am being honest so what is your complaint, exactly?

Do you honestly believe your false accusation that he is promiscuous?

 

[kaylagrl]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

Kind of a terrible thing to wish upon someone. You and Magenta should un-like my post, because that last paragraph is about you two. I ask him what I have asked and say the things I have said because I believe he is asking genuinely for an academic discussion on the topic. If it were possible I would nullify your reputation point, because I do not agree with your accusations against this man.

Quote "Kind of a terrible thing to wish upon someone. "

No,I dont think so at all. His comment to me is what gave him the comment he got.For someone to come here and try to argue polygamy and twist Scripture and then insult everyone who answers him,he gets no respect from me. His lusts are his own issue. And for him to say my husband would step outside his marriage....my husband would knock him flat on his behind if he said that to his face.He honors me and he honors his marriage. Someone joked with him on this subject and he was very upset that someone would suggest he would be unfaithful. He set them straight fast. So no,I dont feel bad about my answer at all.

Quote " You and Magenta should un-like my post, because that last paragraph is about you two."

Yes,I see that and made the change. So you agree with his lust issue,is that what you're saying? Because hes the one using the word lust,not Magenta and I.

Quote "I ask him what I have asked and say the things I have said because I believe he is asking genuinely for an academic discussion on the topic. "

No,he's not looking for discussion.As usual with people spouting false beliefs he cuts down anyone who disagrees and twists Scripture to his benefit.

Quote " If it were possible I would nullify your reputation point, because I do not agree with your accusations against this man."

You cant be speaking to me,I gave you no rep point,nor will I.

 

[Magenta]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

Do you honestly believe your false accusation that he is promiscuous?

Now you are falsely accusing me.

 

[Magenta]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

You insult him because you say you do not believe he is trying to have an academic conversation on polygamy, but you accuse him falsely that he is promiscuous, and so forth.

I have not called him dishonest, but he accused me falsely of being dishonest, and so I ask him why he thinks this because I believe he is honestly trying to have an academic conversation.

More of your false accusations. How dishonest you are!

 

[Hungry]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

I don't like golf, precisely for that reason, so the time I could be spending on the golf course, I am able to spend with my wife.

I don't see how you derived your conclusion that I probably am not "giving enough attention to the one have." That is pure speculation on your part.

Maybe you missed the point. We aren't slaves to our lusts. Even though we want something doesn't mean it is good for us. Even if I ate salads all day every day, continuously binging on leafy goodness, it doesn't mean I'm doing a good thing. Should I say, "At least I'm not eating bacon and cake all day." The point is that we are new creations and don't need to satisfy our lusts. We can just ignore them. Adam was given Eve to help him with his mission. She wasn't given to satisfy his lusts. Look at the time line and see how long they waited to have sex. Look at the span between children. They weren't going at it like bunnies. Your lust needs to be examined not the laws for polygamy. If you need another wife for sexual fulfillment then you need to analyze why God gave man, woman. We are to join to become one. One is enough for any man whose desire in life is to please God and not the flesh.

 

[kaylagrl]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

Do you honestly believe your false accusation that he is promiscuous?

Quote "Would you not rather a man fulfill his lusts through his marriages, rather than going outside his marriage?"

Is this a statement you agree with? Have you ever been married? Do you think marriage is about a man fulfilling his lusts? Or are you more mature than that? Do you think this attitude is fair to any wife? So you think perhaps a man that can't be fulfilled by his wife might just have an issue that has nothing to do with her? Some questions for you to consider. How you answer will prove your maturity or lack of it. If you have not been married it may be hard to take your opinion seriously.

 

[kaylagrl]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

Maybe you missed the point. We aren't slaves to our lusts. Even though we want something doesn't mean it is good for us. Even if I ate salads all day every day, continuously binging on leafy goodness, it doesn't mean I'm doing a good thing. Should I say, "At least I'm not eating bacon and cake all day." The point is that we are new creations and don't need to satisfy our lusts. We can just ignore them. Adam was given Eve to help him with his mission. She wasn't given to satisfy his lusts. Look at the time line and see how long they waited to have sex. Look at the span between children. They weren't going at it like bunnies. Your lust needs to be examined not the laws for polygamy. If you need another wife for sexual fulfillment then you need to analyze why God gave man, woman. We are to join to become one. One is enough for any man whose desire in life is to please God and not the flesh.

Im almost afraid to hit like on this.... And a rep point for you sir.

 

[Magenta]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

Quote "Would you not rather a man fulfill his lusts through his marriages, rather than going outside his marriage?"

Is this a statement you agree with? Have you ever been married? Do you think marriage is about a man fulfilling his lusts? Or are you more mature than that? Do you think this attitude is fair to any wife? So you think perhaps a man that can't be fulfilled by his wife might just have an issue that has nothing to do with her? Some questions for you to consider. How you answer will prove your maturity or lack of it. If you have not been married it may be hard to take your opinion seriously.

He has never been married if it is who we think it is.

 

[Chokmahiel]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

More of your false accusations. How dishonest you are!

Did you say this, or did you not say it?

We insult him to call him out on his dishonesty? Well, I guess to be called dishonest is insulting, but then you do it and pretend you are better than we are, because you think you are having an academic discussion by allowing him to jerk you around as he has. You are a funny little boy also.

Now you are falsely accusing me.

Did you say this, or did you not say it?

No, your proclivity to sexual promiscuity tells you you can have as many women as you want as long as you marry them, and you rationalize it by perverting Scripture. Go read up about Hosea.

The other woman here is wiser than you are, you may unlike my post now like she wisely did.

 

[Magenta]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

Did you say this, or did you not say it?

Did you say this, or did you not say it?

The other woman here is wiser than you are, you may unlike my post now like she wisely did.

I never accused him of being promiscuous, that was your false accusation well, one of them, haha oh my, you know how to quote, what does that prove exactly? Except that you refuse to admit your error and seek to make me wrong for your false accusations.

 

[Magenta]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

You even accuse the other of falsely accusing you and then say you have not called them dishonest. Oh, okay, so if I then falsely accuse someone, where is the harm in it according to you, since there is no dishonesty in it? When you are able to make sense of your own nonsense, please let me know Until then, you cannot fool me into thinking you understand wisdom.

 

[Chokmahiel]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

I never accused him of being promiscuous, that was your false accusation well, one of them, haha oh my, you know how to quote, what does that prove exactly? Except that you refuse to admit your error and seek to make me wrong for your false accusations.

So is it false that you said this?

No, your proclivity to sexual promiscuity tells you you can have as many women as you want as long as you marry them, and you rationalize it by perverting Scripture. Go read up about Hosea.

 

[Magenta]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

So is it false that you said this?

It is false on your part yes, for you have now multiple times falsely accused me of saying they are promiscuous when plainly by my own words which you have just quoted, I said no such thing. Open your eyes.

 

[Chokmahiel]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

You even accuse the other of falsely accusing you and then say you have not called them dishonest. Oh, okay, so if I then falsely accuse someone, where is the harm in it according to you, since there is no dishonesty in it? When you are able to make sense of your own nonsense, please let me know Until then, you cannot fool me into thinking you understand wisdom.

Show me where I called him dishonest. It is not an accusation to say one has made a false accusation. Nor do I insult him in return for it, but instead ask him questions for clarity.

 

[Chokmahiel]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

It is false on your part yes, for you have now multiple times falsely accused me of saying they are promiscuous when plainly by my own words which you have just quoted, I said no such thing. Open your eyes.

So you did not say this?

No, your proclivity to sexual promiscuity tells you you can have as many women as you want as long as you marry them, and you rationalize it by perverting Scripture. Go read up about Hosea.

 

[Magenta]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

Show me where I called him dishonest. It is not an accusation to say one has made a false accusation. Nor do I insult him in return for it, but instead ask him questions for clarity.

I say it is dishonesty to falsely accuse. Your understanding is lacking severely.

 

[Chokmahiel]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

I say it is dishonesty to falsely accuse. Your understanding is lacking severely.

Well that's what you say. I thought he was sincere but merely confused on why I ask him what I asked him, hence my willingness to patiently clarify.

 

[Magenta]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

It is not an accusation to say one has made a false accusation.

What would you call it? I call false accusations dishonesty. I make no bones about that, and call you out on your nonsense about it. You want to call them something else and pretend a rose by any other name would smell different.

 

[Chokmahiel]

Re: Polygamy -- continuation of older thread.

What would you call it? I call false accusations dishonesty. I make no bones about that, and call you out on your nonsense about it. You want to call them something else and pretend a rose by any other name would smell different.

Well it is just a statement of fact that a false accusation is a charge that is not true. It could be that it is made in ignorance or for other reasons.