I said it.
Imputed righteousness is not biblical, it is a reformation doctrine invented so that
believers could be sinners and still be regard as righteous and forgiven.
It is often taken to be Abrahams faith being reconned as righteousness.
When I learnt imputed righteousness of Christ is an invented theological term,
it settled for me another issue, that our faith is reconned as righteousness not our walk.
So you can walk righteously but that is not enough, because it is communion with the
Lord that is the life and the truth.
Now through Jesus's righteousness sacrificed on the cross we gain forgiveness of past
sins, washed clean and purified, so that we can walk blamelessly before the King.
The problem is without imputed righteousness surely one sin and we have lost salvation.
But if salvation or righteousness is actually founded on faith, then this is the grace covering
while we resolve our sinful issues through repentance and confession. Now if we do not
resolve them over time, our faith will wane and finally fail and we will fall away.
Now for most this is so bad and terrible, the idea of falling away it is unbelief to even say it
is possible, so you definately must not know Christ.
So this is a different faith structure within the same theology, but a different take on almost
everything, even involving reinterpreting what repentance actually is.
So there you have it, the alternative view point,
