K
kaylagrl
Guest
Ok so free will,where do we all stand on that.Im guessing Im going to get several different answers on this one.
Ok so free will,where do we all stand on that.Im guessing Im going to get several different answers on this one.
Men have a will, it's just that the it's subject to man's nature, before the holy spirit working in us, our will is in bondage to sin, when the holy spirit works in us, then man has a new nature and acts accordingly to that new nature which comes from the spirit of God.Ok so free will,where do we all stand on that.Im guessing Im going to get several different answers on this one.
Another term that needs defining, even by Arminians. Free will gives the impression we can choose a life of perfection making a savior obsolete. It is the Pelagean heresy. Absolute free will leads to no other conclusion.
The reformed belief is that of the bondage of the will. We have a will, but it is limited by our nature. Paul says that:
7 For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot. 8 Those who are in the flesh cannot please God.
This is just one of many, many passages that describe our natural state and our inability to do what is pleasing to God unless we are born again of the Spirit.
No,I did not know there were two different blocks,someone said so earlier about baptism. Im no nothing about Reformed except I had heard the name. Ive been in a lot of denominations but I dont believe I was in Reformed,but perhaps I was and didn't know it!
So now you say you are Reformed but haven't read Calvins works. So if Reformed =Calvinists do you have a different belief than Calvinism or are there parts you agree with? I guess the SofF would tell me all that info...
Whereas I do agree with everything you wrote, I do want to clarify something for Kayla, (and anyone else interested in what we believe.) You started with the premise that Jesus wasn't an afterthought -- Redemption through Christ wasn't an afterthought. I agree, however that gets into another area Reformers don't agree on too -- supralapsarianism vs. infralapsarianism. Sure enough, some Reformers really do believe the redemption was an afterthought. (And sure enough, that really was a cause for division within a denomination.)Before the foundation of the world, God the Father, Jesus Christ the Son, and the holy spirit designed a plan that would bring glory to the God the Father through creation, He did that so that He would have a people to be called His own and designed it that way and for Him to be glorified in the process.
Jesus' death on the cross and redeeming us wasn't an afterthought to Adam sinning in the garden of Eden, it was God's plan all along that things would happen that way, and He did things as to maximize the glory He receives from His creation, all the evil in the world isn't meaningless, it all has a purpose and you can believe me or not, but even actions intended as evil by men are intended for good by God, as Paul said was the case in Jesus going to calvary, it was the result of actions by 4 groups of people, yet God had designed that to be the means by which Christ would die and redeem us, yet He's still just and punishes evildoers for their actions, even if God intended them for good.
In the reformed faith, salvation is a work of the triune God: God the Father elected us to be saved, Jesus the Son died in our place and received the just compensation for our sins and the holy spirit works in those who God the Father elected and those people then believe in Christ and his work at cavalry, no one can believe if the holy spirit doesn't convict them first.
Ok so free will,where do we all stand on that.Im guessing Im going to get several different answers on this one.
Ok so free will,where do we all stand on that.Im guessing Im going to get several different answers on this one.
Know one outside of Christ is really free, John 8:35ff. Scripture teaches us that man is hostile toward God, and do not seek Him, Romans 3:10ff. Those who believe they come to God via free will are misunderstanding their lost position. This is usually juxtaposed with an ideology that God only wants genuine love, so leaves it up to them, and since they came to Him in love, then it is genuine. Just think it through for a while - they are saying they came to God because they had genuine love for Him, yet Scripture speaks of their hostility. Of course it can get more complicated, but that's the basic misnomer of free will.
I agree, supralapsarianism vs infralapsarianism, besides that point, I think that post shows well where the reformed stand and I'm glad you agree with me on this.(Busy day, so coming late to this party.)
Whereas I do agree with everything you wrote, I do want to clarify something for Kayla, (and anyone else interested in what we believe.) You started with the premise that Jesus wasn't an afterthought -- Redemption through Christ wasn't an afterthought. I agree, however that gets into another area Reformers don't agree on too -- supralapsarianism vs. infralapsarianism. Sure enough, some Reformers really do believe the redemption was an afterthought. (And sure enough, that really was a cause for division within a denomination.)
Personally, seems like a stupid reason to split, however Reformers can believe either side of that argument and still be considered Reformed Theology. Kayla is trying to figure out what we all believe. We believe many things, as individuals, but some things we believe that make us Reformed. I think it would be good to stick to those, or it gets exploded to kingdom come all over again. (Figuratively, pun not intended.)
How do you feel about the word Arminian? "Calvinist" is something like that word. It started out as an insult, but turned into the word most people understand for what we believe. Now we're somewhere between wondering if we're being insulted, or if the person just doesn't know the other word.
THANK YOU! One thing answered. All my friends call themselves Calvinists so as I said,I had heard Reformed but did not know they were the same thing. So the Calvinists I know are also Baptist. So would you attend a Reformed or Baptist,or it wouldn't matter. And I do know not all Baptists are Calvinists.
One thing I always pray for is for the fruits of the spirit in my life, I don't wanna see any of those fruits lacking in my christian walk, and if they do lack on someone's walk I'm afraid for that person's view of salvation."Nature cries out for the nutriment that is appropriate to it; and if you know people whom you think are Christians, and who themselves think they are Christians, but who do not want the preaching of the Word, and do not revel in it, and rejoice in it, and want as much as they can possibly get of it, I suggest that the right question to ask about them is, 'Are these people Christians?" D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones
I believe the good Doctor summed it up pretty well in the above quote. One who is bound in sin is not "free" in his will, and draws from the nutriments that are according to his character. We should really think that through because it applies to the lost and to the professing believer. Evidence of conversion is very important, and so too examination.
(Busy day, so coming late to this party.)
Whereas I do agree with everything you wrote, I do want to clarify something for Kayla, (and anyone else interested in what we believe.) You started with the premise that Jesus wasn't an afterthought -- Redemption through Christ wasn't an afterthought. I agree, however that gets into another area Reformers don't agree on too -- supralapsarianism vs. infralapsarianism. Sure enough, some Reformers really do believe the redemption was an afterthought. (And sure enough, that really was a cause for division within a denomination.)
Personally, seems like a stupid reason to split, however Reformers can believe either side of that argument and still be considered Reformed Theology. Kayla is trying to figure out what we all believe. We believe many things, as individuals, but some things we believe that make us Reformed. I think it would be good to stick to those, or it gets exploded to kingdom come all over again. (Figuratively, pun not intended.)
One thing I always pray for is for the fruits of the spirit in my life, I don't wanna see any of those fruits lacking in my christian walk, and if they do lack on someone's walk I'm afraid for that person's view of salvation.
How do you feel about the word Arminian? "Calvinist" is something like that word. It started out as an insult, but turned into the word most people understand for what we believe. Now we're somewhere between wondering if we're being insulted, or if the person just doesn't know the other word.
Same thing with Arminian. (Doubly complicated, because I never remember which word means people who think a particular way or people who live in Armenia. One little letter confuses me.) It too started out as a slam. Now it's the word people know the best, even if they don't know what it means. Somehow another, I keep thinking "Wesleyan" is a better word, because of no insult intended, but I don't know if most people who believe in free will salvation understand it is a concept from Wesley.
And, honestly, I would use Wesleyan more often so that one little letter doesn't trip me (and my spellchecker) up all the time.
But Forth got that right. We do cringe at Calvinists a bit, mostly because we're not as nuts as it seems we ought to be. Calvin got stuff wrong. We don't follow him. We follow Christ through Reformed Theology. Just as you follow Christ through Wesleyan Theology.
As for changing denominations? The problem is not all Baptists are reformed. Not all Lutherans are reformed. Not all Presbyterians are reformed. And some that are reformed aren't any of those. I'm Presbyterian because hubby discovered James Boice happened to be the Teaching Elder at a local church. He (we) like James Boise (who has since died) and agree with his teachings, so that's where we went. Why keep looking once you found where you belong?
I don't know which Baptists are reformed, or which Lutherans. I'm not against any church that teaches Christ in a doctrinal position all Christians should have, but I'd be a menace to a church that also doesn't hold onto Reformed Theology. Truly, would you want me as a member of your church? We may love each other, but we'd drive each other nuts over theology. lol
It really helps to keep to a church that fits your theology.
(And back to busy day, so it might take me a bit to catch up.)
What happens to the ones not "chosen" of God? I believe this is the fundamental error in only certain people are chosen by God and the others are rejected by Him "on purpose" despite the abundance of "whosever's and all and every person that believes" that the NT is full of.