Calvinists,Im Asking...

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
My apologies Kayla, it seems I have set off "attack mode" in some folks.
When you show your hypocrisy, double standards and bear false witness, that's what happens - men of God call you on it. Then you send up a flare for rescue instead of owning your behavior? Callow, and that is a fact.
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
Still our fault huh? :rolleyes:
The derailment or the personal attacks on me for daring to comment?

The derailment was started by people coming in telling Calvinist what they believe.

It continued with Calvinist making false statements about what "free will preachers" taught.

Then it moved to personal attacks.

Again I apologize for my part in it.

However, would you let folks stand around saying YOU taught or believed that God chose people to go to hell, Forth?

Neither can I stand by and allow the lie to stand that all free will preacher teach such false doctrine as the innate goodness of mankind outside of God's grace.

Some do reject the doctrine of Original sin. But it is wrong to lump all together.

That is my point.
 

Marano

Senior Member
Dec 7, 2011
398
32
28
29
Nope. Not the ones I know. The ones I know cross the board on End Times. And yet, End Times isn't preached at all. I, personally, think we're still here only because the Lord has yet to save all the people he intends to save. Most of Revelation has already happened. And, although we are in God's kingdom already, the new heavens and earth will be The Kingdom. (I think I fit into, "P. None of the above." But I could argue that one for hours with fellow Reformers.)
I haven't found too many people that hold to my beliefs on the reformed camp, I just said as it is my experience most are amileanist.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
It continued with Calvinist making false statements about what "free will preachers" taught.
Oh, now you're off to pretense?

This never happened. Perhaps it exposed what you believe as being false, but no Calvinist in this thread made any false statement about what free willer's teach. Perhaps it is high time for you to own your errors, and stop bearing false witness.

Show us all one post where a Calvinist made a false statement about what free willers teach. You made the accusation, the burden of proof is on you.
 

ForthAngel

Senior Member
Aug 31, 2012
2,171
91
48
The derailment or the personal attacks on me for daring to comment?

The derailment was started by people coming in telling Calvinist what they believe.
True.

It continued with Calvinist making false statements about what "free will preachers" taught.
This isn't true. Show me where.

Then it moved to personal attacks.
I only bite back those who lie on me. I don't think I attacked you personally, however. I made a few statements is all.

Again I apologize for my part in it.
Thank you

However, would you let folks stand around saying YOU taught or believed that God chose people to go to hell, Forth?
You jump on us for defending ourselves in this regard like we did something wrong. That's literally been happening all week in every single thread where free-will/predestination comes up. It's been a constant onslaught of lies about us from the opposition.

Neither can I stand by and allow the lie to stand that all free will preacher teach such false doctrine as the innate goodness of mankind outside of God's grace.
This is the view being espoused by some like it or not.

Some do reject the doctrine of Original sin. But it is wrong to lump all together.
Doing my best not to.

That is my point.
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
The lost must be regenerated, they don't simply freely choose Christ out of their deep founded love for God that is inherent within them. But that is what the free will false gospel preaches, that they went to Christ out of genuine love for Him and chose Him to save them. That is really an arrogant, fleshly thing to say about ones self that compared to others this is what they did. They should be proud, and they are.

But, you know, they give all the glory to God in token fashion.

God must do His work in the heart, what we call "regeneration" which is what took place within Cornelius in Acts 10. The only way he pleased God was because he was regenerated, then, after Peter was called to preach to him, he was converted. Bo one in the flesh can please God, Romans 8:8, yet the free willers say they can which is nothing short of full Pelagianism.
You falsely accuse free will preachers of not teaching the regeneration of the heart is needed for people to be able to love and accept the Gospel and truly worship God.

This is based on the idea that free will preachers don't teach about original sin or believe in Total depravity of human nature.

That is false. Some may preach false gospel about "the goodness of human nature" but I know many who preach free will but also Original sin and the need for a savior.

Can you preach what you believe without putting others and their beliefs down?
 

Johnny_B

Senior Member
Mar 18, 2017
1,954
64
48
The Wesley Center Online: Sermon 44 - Original Sin

Sermon on Original sin by John Wesley...someone needs to combat the lies.


Like I said, don't tell others what they believe because it's as false as them saying you preach that God choses people to send to hell.

Both Wesley and Arminius believed in Total depravity.
They did, after that is where the separation came about, Wesley's best friend from the holy club was George Whitfield a hard core Calvinist. Yet one of the greatest evangelist in England and America. And we still have people that think the Doctrines of Grace cause people to not evangelize. The part that interests me is how could Wesley and Arminius believe in total depravity and not understand the need for God's grace to be saved.

The thing that always makes me wonder, are those that will fight tooth and nail, that it was their faith that saved them and by that faith it brought God's grace. It amazes me that someone would argue that he saved himself and not God and
turn around and say we are saved by grace, when they argue faith is what saved them.

Many people know of the word grace say the word grace, but when you say that it's by God's grace alone that we are saved, they will argue that it's their faith that saved them and God did nothing that they didn't allow God to do. That makes as much since as those that pray and say "I command you Lord" how is He Lord if you human speck of dust on a larger speck of dust, are commanding the Lord that created the universes by the command of His Word? I
remember I was part o that crowed and I said it once and I was so convicted that that was the first and last time I said it.
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
By some ForthAngel, but not all.

Just like some Hyper Calvinist condemn babies to hell.

Should all Calvinist be judged by that extreme example?
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
Someone is being shown the errors of the false free will false gospel, and yet is still trying to breath life into that death. It is hard to kick against the goads. No man outside of Christ are free in their will, John 8:35ff.

On another note, yes, ForthAngel, you are correct, there has been a constant onslaught of lies and not only that, they are accepted lies by many others. Those who see those lies won't speak up, they too go on the same attack, or at the least turn a blind eye.
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
The part that interests me is how could Wesley and Arminius believe in total depravity and not understand the need for God's grace to be saved.
I have not read Arminus sermons or letters but Wesley clearly States the need for God's grace to be saved.

People from both "sides" of the debate make false claims of what the other believes...strawmen...then proceed in burning them.
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
1689 LBC: Chapter 9: "Of Free Will"

Chapter 9: Of Free Will

1._____ God hath endued the will of man with that natural liberty and power of acting upon choice, that it is neither forced, nor by any necessity of nature determined to do good or evil.
( Matthew 17:12; James 1:14; Deuteronomy 30:19 )
2._____ Man, in his state of innocency, had freedom and power to will and to do that which was good and well-pleasing to God, but yet was unstable, so that he might fall from it.
( Ecclesiastes 7:29; Genesis 3:6 )

3._____ Man, by his fall into a state of sin, hath wholly lost all ability of will to any spiritual good accompanying salvation; so as a natural man, being altogether averse from that good, and dead in sin, is not able by his own strength to convert himself, or to prepare himself thereunto.
( Romans 5:6; Romans 8:7; Ephesians 2:1, 5; Titus 3:3-5; John 6:44 )

4._____ When God converts a sinner, and translates him into the state of grace, he freeth him from his natural bondage under sin, and by his grace alone enables him freely to will and to do that which is spiritually good; yet so as that by reason of his remaining corruptions, he doth not perfectly, nor only will, that which is good, but doth also will that which is evil.
( Colossians 1:13; John 8:36; Philippians 2:13; Romans 7:15, 18, 19, 21, 23 )

5._____ This will of man is made perfectly and immutably free to good alone in the state of glory only.
( Ephesians 4:13 )
I don't see it as so different from what Wesley teaches about free will.
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,785
4,453
113
I have not read Arminus sermons or letters but Wesley clearly States the need for God's grace to be saved.

People from both "sides" of the debate make false claims of what the other believes...strawmen...then proceed in burning them.
In our membership booklet the core beliefs with Methodist are all focused on the cross, Jesus, grace and faith.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
1689 LBC: Chapter 9: "Of Free Will"



I don't see it as so different from what Wesley teaches about free will.
Then you don't understand either side, free will, or what you have just read. It is clearly against the arminian error of Wesleyan and Methodist errors.

IOW since point 3 is true, then Wesleyan doctrine is wrong.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
But, that being said, you've accused of hyper-calvinism concerning infants. That's bearing false witness. The LBCoF begs to differ with your view and false accusation on this issue.
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
The Wesley Center Online: Disputation 11 - On The Free Will Of Man And Its Powers

In this state, the free will of man towards the true good is not only wounded, maimed, infirm, bent, and weakened; but it is also imprisoned, destroyed, and lost. And its powers are not only debilitated and useless unless they be assisted by grace, but it has no powers whatever except such as are excited by Divine grace. For Christ has said, "Without me ye can do nothing." St. Augustine, after having diligently meditated upon each word in this passage, speaks thus: "Christ does not say, without me ye can do but Little; neither does He say, without me ye can do any Arduous Thing, nor without me ye can do it with difficulty. But he says, without me ye can do Nothing! Nor does he say, without me ye cannot complete any thing; but without me ye can do Nothing." That this may be made more manifestly to appear, we will separately consider the mind, the affections or will, and the capability, as contra-distinguished from them, as well as the life itself of an unregenerate man.

8. The mind of man, in this state, is dark, destitute of the saving knowledge of God, and, according to the Apostle, incapable of those things which belong to the Spirit of God. For

"the animal man has no perception of the things of the Spirit of God;" (1 Corinthians 2:14;)

****
But far different from this is the consideration of the free will of man, as constituted in the third state of Renewed Righteousness. For when a new light and knowledge of God and Christ, and of the Divine will, have been kindled in his mind; and when new affections, inclinations and motions agreeing with the law of God, have been excited in his heart, and new powers have been produced in him; it comes to pass, that, being liberated from the kingdom of darkness, and being now made "light in the Lord," (Ephesians 5:8,) he understands the true and saving good; that, after the hardness of his stony heart has been changed into the softness of flesh, and the law of God according to the covenant of grace has been inscribed on it, (Jeremiah 31, 32-35,) he loves and embraces that which is good, just, and holy; and that, being made capable in Christ, co-operating now with God, he prosecutes the good which he knows and loves, and he begins himself to perform it in deed. But this, whatever it may be of knowledge, holiness and power, is all begotten within him by the Holy Spirit; who is, on this account, called "the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, of counsel and might, of knowledge and the fear of Jehovah," (Isaiah 11:2,) "the Spirit of grace," (Zechariah 12:10,) "of faith," (2 Corinthians 4:13,) "the Spirit of adoption" into sons, (Romans 8:16,) and "the Spirit of holiness;" and to whom the acts of illumination, regeneration, renovation, and confirmation, are attributed in the Scriptures.

13. But two things must be here observed. The First that this work of regeneration and illumination is not completed in one moment; but that it is advanced and promoted, from time to time, by daily increase. For "our old man is crucified, that the body of sin might be destroyed," (Romans 6:6,) and "that the inward man may be renewed day by day." (2 Corinthians 4:16.) For this reason, in regenerate persons, as long as they inhabit these mortal bodies, "the flesh lusteth against the Spirit." (Galatians 5:17.)

***14. The Second thing to be observed is, that as the very first commencement of every good thing, so likewise the progress, continuance and confirmation, nay, even the perseverance in good, are not from ourselves, but from God through the Holy Spirit. For

"he who hath begun a good work in you, will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ;" (Philippians 1:6;)

and

"we are kept by the power of God through faith." (1 Peter 1:5.)

"The God of all grace makes us perfect, stablishes, strengthens and settles us." (1:10.)
Is there really this huge divide people claim exist or are people building strawmen to burn?
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
Then you don't understand either side, free will, or what you have just read. It is clearly against the arminian error of Wesleyan and Methodist errors.

IOW since point 3 is true, then Wesleyan doctrine is wrong.
Or your belief of what Wesleyan doctrine is wrong?

Any chance you might be wrong?
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
But, that being said, you've accused of hyper-calvinism concerning infants. That's bearing false witness. The LBCoF begs to differ with your view and false accusation on this issue.
I made a comment on what someone else said in this thread..go back and call them out. Some Calvinist said that it was true.

.I have no clue what you believe (for or against condemning babies)

I know ForthAngel is against, so hopefully he understood the point I was making.

Which part do you recommend? Baptism?
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
Let me make this simple.

Man = evil
God = good
God saves some man = grace
God no save other man = hell for that man

Well you cant get more simple than that :rolleyes: