Seducing spirits and doctrines of demons?
- Thread starter preacher4truth
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
No, I didn't know that, mostly because it's completely untrue. 
You see, sometimes there will be somebody on our side arguing with the other side, & for a while seems to make some headway. The next thing you know, they're acting hostile with the other side & get themselves banned. It's purposely done so they can destroy our rep & witness so they can look like the "good guys".
If that doesn't work in their favor, they don't care, because the true side's rep has been destroyed, leaving confusion instead.
Either way, Satan wins.
One could argue and I will not, that Christ is not being preached in either video. One could also state both videos are blasphemous, depending on a persons theology and beliefs.
I see both videos as extreme examples of the doctrines of demons.
In an effort to debunk the other, one quenches all moves of the Spirit, while the other shows nothing but flesh manifesting in ways that is driven by the flesh.
I see both videos as extreme examples of the doctrines of demons.
In an effort to debunk the other, one quenches all moves of the Spirit, while the other shows nothing but flesh manifesting in ways that is driven by the flesh.
Last edited:
The Charismatic movement was once called neo-Pentecostalism. There is a direct line to the Azusa street revival that took place in 1906. This paved the way for the originally much smaller Word Faith movement that started with Christian Science in the late 1800s and eventually there were some cross-overs in practices, namely extreme emphasis on "gifts of the Holy Spirit", and the eventual undermining and corruption of the Gospel. Pentecostalism was rejected by mainline Christianity for the first 50 years it was around.
I don't know where it started(charismatic movement), however by the 80s there were a lot of Baptist joined up because they believed the gifts of the Spirit were still in effect. My first impression of a charismatic church was positive because they stood up and really praised the Lord(so it seemed to me), however after being there a while I noticed a lack of stability in their walk with the Lord, they seem to be all over the place, not really knowing the truth of God on many issues.
The WOF movement did not really fully start until Kennith Hagin Sr. which begin teaching many of EW Kenyon's written works.
Kenyon had some serious flaws in most of his works. One small book is called 2 kinds of righteousness and that was very spot on and from the Bible. Hagin began the prosperity and faith healing movement which both are very wrong.
Kenyon had some serious flaws in most of his works. One small book is called 2 kinds of righteousness and that was very spot on and from the Bible. Hagin began the prosperity and faith healing movement which both are very wrong.
Thank God you're on track here, I feared your prior questioning. My apologies.
I would like to provide more context then I will be done with this post.
First as a mod I get many complainants for many people. which are here in this Thread posting. I do not have time to look at every video . So I asked a specific person for more information. Which that person provided. The comment made after that was a presupposition of my question to that person as you can see.
The apology given was not for what was said, it was given after the person saw I was in agreement with the context that the video actions of the people in it was inappropriate. That was not an apology for the insult . kind of like " i'll slap you in the face and say sorry and i'm ok to do it again. I have no issue with the comment other than it was disrespectful to a Mod.
So I addressed it. If a person has no thought of saying this to a mod I wonder what they say to other here?
In fact I have many of the complaints and comments.
But I understand that we have to be long suffering and a lot of times the complaints to mods are look what member "A" said while forgetting what member "B" said before they made the complaint.
All I did was ask a question. and another member provided an insult those who have discernment can see very clearly the what was said after the mod asked a question and they can see the context of the apology.
I do not taken things personal never have never will but one should respect all the mods. and not assume we have all the information provided on the Thread and will at times from time ask you for help to get the information faster.
Thank you
CS1
Last edited:
Thank God you're on track here, I feared your prior questioning. My apologies.
I would like to provide more context then I will be done with this post.
First as a mod I get many complainants for many people. which are here in this Thread posting. I do not have time to look at every video . So I asked a specific person for more information. Which that person provided. The comment made after that was a presupposition of my question to that person as you can see.
The apology given was not for what was said, it was given after the person saw I was in agreement with the context that the video actions of the people in it was inappropriate. That was not an apology for the insult . kind of like " i'll slap you in the face and say sorry and i'm ok to do it again. I have no issue with the comment other than it was disrespectful to a Mod.
So I addressed it. If a person has no thought of saying this to a mod I wonder what they say to other here?
In fact I have many of the complaints and comments.
But I understand that we have to be long suffering and a lot of times the complaints to mods are look what member "A" said while forgetting what member "B" said before they made the complaint.
All I did was ask a question. and another member provided an insult those who have discernment can see very clearly the what was said after the mod asked a question and they can see the context of the apology.
I do not taken things personal never have never will but one should respect all the mods. and not assume we have all the information provided on the Thread and will at times from time ask you for help to get the information faster.
Thank you
CS1
I would like to provide more context then I will be done with this post.
First as a mod I get many complainants for many people. which are here in this Thread posting. I do not have time to look at every video . So I asked a specific person for more information. Which that person provided. The comment made after that was a presupposition of my question to that person as you can see.
The apology given was not for what was said, it was given after the person saw I was in agreement with the context that the video actions of the people in it was inappropriate. That was not an apology for the insult . kind of like " i'll slap you in the face and say sorry and i'm ok to do it again. I have no issue with the comment other than it was disrespectful to a Mod.
So I addressed it. If a person has no thought of saying this to a mod I wonder what they say to other here?
In fact I have many of the complaints and comments.
But I understand that we have to be long suffering and a lot of times the complaints to mods are look what member "A" said while forgetting what member "B" said before they made the complaint.
All I did was ask a question. and another member provided an insult those who have discernment can see very clearly the what was said after the mod asked a question and they can see the context of the apology.
I do not taken things personal never have never will but one should respect all the mods. and not assume we have all the information provided on the Thread and will at times from time ask you for help to get the information faster.
Thank you
CS1
FYI for you