Grace and acceptance friend,
First one should realize the purpose of the law, then it gets clear as to its function for God.
Let's start by cognizing that in the beginning only "one" rule or Law was given to man. This rule, "Do not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil." (found in Genesis 2:17)
Should look also at the reaction that occurred from mankind eating it. That mankind has the ability to cognize both the good and evil. (found in Genesis 3:22)
Logically then it's safe to step on the rock that earlier then the eating of these fruits mankind had the void of the "cognization" both good and evil.
During this time in the earlier, God called creation "Good." (found in Genesis 1:31)
Let's then look at the difference between these concepts to help show what makes our Creator happy.
To start is going to help cognize the "knowledge of good". And the Good can get finishioned as the structure of "how" as in comparison to the occurrence of the event. In appropriation of the "occurrence" when matching that of the comparative "how" when aligned then receive the label of "Good".
Naturally as Evil has the opposition of concept to that of Good, therefore Evil can get finishioned as the structure of "how" as in comparison to the occurrence of the event whereas difference appears. In English this is labeled as "error".
Again using logic, the only possible way for a person to cognize good and evil, it's through the cognization of how and error.
Now, lets look then at the difference atween "how" and atween "good". A how shows the functionality of the plan of action. The good happens from the comparison of that plan to the occurrence.
Now enters in the concept of Law. Law can get finishioned as the structure of "how".
Take a moment to cognize that Law in of itself only can appropriate with the cognization of how.
Therefore the command can come to three restatements all showing the separate tiers of the concept.
The Full Concept (Outer Layer)
- "Do not eat from the tree of the cognization of good and evil."
The Inner Layer
- "Do not eat from the tree of the cognization of how it works and error."
The Comparative Layer (as during the manifestation of the event)
- "Do not eat from the tree of the cognization of law and lawlessness."
Even God through Paul brings to light: "the dangers of the letter of the law" and the "life that comes from the spirit of the law" (found in 2 Corinthians 3:6)
Therefore come to cognization that a how in of itself can remain in safety. The danger occurs when that how has a comparison to the occurrence. God gives the example:
"And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen? 7 If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him." (Genesis 4:6-7 KJV)
Taking some time to analyze this certain truth may parse from this.
- The situation specifically focuses on anger [Why art thou wroth?]
- The effect of this anger has caused a fallen countenance [why is thy countenance fallen?]
- comparison of a how to an occurrence shows [If thou doest well]
- the knowledge of error shown as a cause [if thou doest not well]
- an error shows as a separate concept than sin [if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door.]
- an error can get finishioned as the path towards sin [sin lieth at the door.]
- error by itself it's safe to manifest (within a perspective) (reasoning shows as follows)
- Adam and Eve earlier then cognizing good and evil "perhaps" possibly did error "from a perspective"
- How would they have the ability to decern it?
- Even their error, God still considered as Good (for " if " it was done, it was without anger and without a fallen countenance)
Jesus uses a phrase "weeping and gnashing of teeth" many times within his parables.
- Logically can get connected "gnashing of teeth" as that of "anger/wroth"
- By association "weeping" can get connected to "a fallen countenance"
God gave Paul cognition of this when he gives the command: "Do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God" (Ephesians 4:30)
To follow this command lets cognize grief:
The Greek word for Soul [psuché](
Strong's Greek: 5590. ψυχή (psuché) -- breath, the soul). The root word for the scientific branch called psychology, and psychology does indeed teach about grief. They call it the "Five Stages of Grief Theory" (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grief).
The stages show as follow:
denial
anger
bargaining
depression
acceptance
However, through the power of the cognition of God is going to show how this observed truth functions with biblical truth. For when a match of truth occurs from two witnesses, can step on the rock in confidence.
- "gnashing of teeth" - "anger/wroth" - anger
- "weeping" - "a fallen countenance" - depression
Jesus tells us it's our faith that will save us. Now is going to take the cognization to "how" faith saves us.
- The first stage to the stages of grief called denial shows when a "how" compares to an "occurrence".
- The last stage of grief called acceptance shows when the "how" stops comparing to an "occurrence".
Likewise
- Faith accepts an occurrence.
- Forgiveness leads to acceptance.
The Law of the Bible shows the "How" of acceptable "occurrence".
Relying on the law to achieve acceptance, misses the point of the law. The point of the law - It's that through a strategically defined "how" that all that follow it would achieve acceptance. Therefore in this, one can say the Law is Good. Yet since the war atween "freedom of expression" and atween "uniformity" exists, the need for expression causes rebellion against the law rendering the point of the law useless. For it only works when all follow it. Therefore a new way has been shown to us. A new way that allows freedom of expression and a multitude of hows. That through the acceptance of others how [thy will be done] and [each following the governing of their own country] unifies the whole society towards that of the best Law [The Law of Acceptance]
Therefore the saying "your faith has made you well." could get the state as "your acceptance has made you well."
For it's through acceptance that the reason for the first Law, "Do not eat from the tree of the cognization of good and evil." comes to fulfillment. That even with the fact that we cognize both how and error, due to the "fruits", the power of the fruits lose through acceptance, or (faith in what God does)
For further convincing proofs, consider teachings on anger.
Anyone wanting to dismiss this teaching saying Jesus was angry, should look more into the meaning of that Greek word, which carries the meaning, "swelled up with passion". Translators, still needing the understanding choose anger as the word, out of the simplicity of cognition, as in that time anger seemed acceptable, However, in this time, anger shows the sign of the sinner. For many messages make it plain to rid of anger.
Sin then can get finishioned as a change of spirit from that of Jesus. Scientifically it can get finishioned as the adjustment of the Amygdala from that of directing brain power of the smart brain to that of the dumb brain. For the Amygdala specifically deals with threat detection, and threat only has perception through the cognition of good and evil.
The activation of the Limbic brain alters the natural balance of the parasympathetic system to that of the sympathetic system, therefore releasing adrenaline. Those wanting to find the cure for cancer should look right there. For its how the body deals with the cleaning of adrenaline, that causes cancer. feel free to look it up.
Acceptance cure many mental illnesses, and psychology could learn much from realizing the teachings of Jesus.
Now come to the conclusion about "judge not lest you judged". This could have the translation of "those comparing how of the occurrence to an expectation of how the occurrence should have occurred will receive the punishment".
Now hear the hard teaching.
Jesus proclaimed "Woe for those laughing". As one with the gift of prophecy, come to the awareness that laughter of itself does indeed come from the comparison of how to the occurrence, and has its own punishment. Others say "Laughter's the best medicine", yet this comes from a certain point of view that dopamine has the ability to nullify pain. Many addictive drugs release dopamine, truth is truth. The real question one should ask, "Why is the body releasing a pain medicine when I laugh?"
And learn that the translation "Blessed those that mourn for they will laugh" should have the translation "blessed are those that mourn for those who do laugh." For depression acts as the final stage towards acceptance. therefore can say it now "Blessed are those that are done mourning for they will live". Yet as the prophet, anyone who laughs should listen to hear the curse that came upon them, and should quickly say, Jesus. Therefore applying that same curse back onto the speaker. For God has said, "I will bless those that bless you, and I will curse those that curse you."
Therefore only bless, for how do you know when someone will call upon the name? Truly Jesus said "its what comes out of the mouth that makes a person unclean" and God through James explains how the sayings represent as fresh water and salt water. And Jesus did say to retain the salt. Therefore is good that everyone considers themselves as a water filter, receiving both fresh and pure water, yet only releasing pure water.
1
