A
Ariel82
Guest
Inheritance. Sheep? or Sons?
Servant, slave, least of men, humble, beaten, bruised sheep and sons.
Inheritance. Sheep? or Sons?
Yep a good study on does infants and mentally handicapped go to hell will put pre election to death where it belongs.
Servant, slave, least of men, humble, beaten, bruised sheep and sons.
John 3:17-20 not 2:17-20Who teaches that you, read John 2:17-20 Jesus did not come to condemn, people are condemned already. That's what this thread is about trying to find who teaches this, because no Calvinist here does. It's a straw man the people that think they know what Calvinism teaches.
I apologized for an unkind comment. The intent of the comment however, was true..
Do not many Baptist churches use Romans 9:21 as proof text for your two questions?Recently a former member posted the following accusations:
Who here teaches these things?
The Reformed have been barraged with many false accusations. One of the drive by slanders of one recently wishing to be removed from the site employed the derision of "lottery" on others who believe in Biblical election. It was intended to ridicule the doctrine of election and those who believe in it.
Now the accusations include the things included in the above quote as well.
So, I am asking, do you teach God creates people to send them to hell?
Do you teach that if one seeks God out of a contrite heart, and thus seeks forgiveness, that it isn't enough?
Or, are all of these simply more false accusations leveled at the Reformed brothers and sisters?
Do not many Baptist churches use Romans 9:21 as proof text for your two questions?
I know, which proves your apology to be disingenuous. IOW, you meant and still mean the harm you intended, and the apology was only remorse for being caught. So, no need to apologize on your part, you still mean what you've said, the apology was all show, or, better yet "biblical abracadabra" and "charisma." I've been around the block enough to know a false apology when I see one.![]()
Are you attempting to be coy or is that a serious reply?I don't know if many do or not. Do you?
Are you attempting to be coy or is that a serious reply?
Do not many Baptist churches use Romans 9:21 as proof text for your two questions?
That's just it....reformed folks don't believe that predestination means some are destined to hell.
They believe that God give a folks a choice but because of the sinful world and human selfish nature..,humans choose self and sin over God and His will.
.only some are given additional grace by God...this draws them out of sin and their own bad decisions into having a saving faith in the gospel.
God allows all to chose life or death but He also makes an extra effort of grace for His elect,whom he chooses to fulfill His will not because of their innate merit.
all I said was you're a toasty kind of guy. You like plain bread and no new revelation.
Is this true ?
It seems you are attempting to sugar coat the doctrine of predestination. The prefix is pre. The root word is destiny. What do you think the word means? It is the opposite of choice.That's just it....reformed folks don't believe that predestination means some are destined to hell.
They believe that God give a folks a choice but because of the sinful world and human selfish nature..,humans choose self and sin over God and His will.
.only some are given additional grace by God...this draws them out of sin and their own bad decisions into having a saving faith in the gospel.
God allows all to chose life or death but He also makes an extra effort of grace for His elect,whom he chooses to fulfill His will not because of their innate merit.
I do give that people just don't know. I did give that. Even spent days explaining it. But at what point, after repeating the same thing again and again, and the person just repeats what's been told over what people of that persuasion tell them, does it finally turn into it is lies?What I've seen is that most don't search it our for themselves, but believe what they've been told by a trusted friend. So to malign them or call them a liar isn't called for because they really believe what they've been told.
But also, when you read the doctrines of grace (the tulip) it's easy to go away with some of the hyper stuff. Theodore Beza who was the one who went after Arminian was the one that drafted along with other men the tulip, but he was more extreme than Calvin. So the way the tulip is worded, it allows extremism.
I kinda jumping in on this thread, but I am really not understanding this idea of an extra measure of grace for His elect?
Which scripture are you drawing from?
I apologized for an unkind comment. The intent of the comment however, was true.
Angela
Ive already said I'm not wordnof faith. But faith in His Word is never wrong.
There are so many gems hidden in the scriptures and Holy Spirit loves to reveal them to us...
They are all about Jesus and what He has to give us.
Passover...
Pentecost..
Tabernacles...
How far will we walk with Him? It's up to us.
In theological terms there are two types of grace: common grace and saving grace. Common grace is the favor that God gives to all people. Generally, it is manifested in the way God takes care of all people by providing for them sunshine, rain, shelter, food, government, laws, general health, etc. Common grace extends to every human alive.
On the other hand, saving grace is that favor from God expressed upon those whom He has chosen. This expression of grace results in salvation; hence we have such verses as:
Ephesians 1:11 In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will."