I miss my buddy in here Utah :(

[kaylagrl]

That wasn't all if it, however, I'm sure that's how you see it anyway.

And you do know you can do the same for Preach and me too, right? Lots of options for you too.

It's the hypocrisy I have problems with.

Yep,I skip over what you say unless its directed at me. Preacher can defend himself. Ive never put anyone on ignore,thats my choice. Hypocrisy goes both ways and I feel the same about you. So we've got that on the table. Where we end this will be the question. You said the friendship was over so lets drop it.I wont mention you,you dont mention me and we'll ignore each others posts.Done.Problem solved.

 

[Stephen63]

Well, I know that feeling. Someone on here would love to see me banned. She is sometimes trying to goad me into a trap. Sucks.

Happens every day to some.....

 

[Depleted]

I can't believe that a simple thread missing someone and wishing them well has turned around into another sparring match...but then again this is CC. Has it really got like this in the family forum now?

Utah was always a perfect gentleman toward me, maybe others just rubbed him up the wrong way, it takes 2 to have a slanging match though.

No match. I left him alone for months and he joined a thread just to attack me. No mud then either. It was poisonous darts.

 

[Depleted]

I didnt see any jabs from you personally (if there was one I may have missed it idk) but I did see some. But I liked the post he made for the second line : p That all of us have gotten pretty rude and aggressive in a debate before. Thats definitely true, for many people.

Post 31. Second paragraph. Some jabbing.

 

[Depleted]

Yep,I skip over what you say unless its directed at me. Preacher can defend himself. Ive never put anyone on ignore,thats my choice. Hypocrisy goes both ways and I feel the same about you. So we've got that on the table. Where we end this will be the question. You said the friendship was over so lets drop it.I wont mention you,you dont mention me and we'll ignore each others posts.Done.Problem solved.

That was the hypocrisy. You tell other people what they should or shouldn't do, while not doing it yourself.

Now that that is on the table, where is my hypocrisy?

 

[blue_ladybug]

Mods, PLEASE close this thread... :/

Utah isn't here anymore to defend himself..

 

[seed_time_harvest]

It's amusing that some are using this thread to show their disdain for others here, to get in some jabs on others they don't like.

I liked Utah, thought he was a cool guy. Like the rest of us, he had his times of being rowdy.

The right thing to do then Is not trust the moderators and give everyone that we like,more chances,right?

 

[Siberian_Khatru]

I have mixed feelings about Utah, maybe a little bit about his ban, even.

A lot of his posts (not "he had his moments") were sardonic with virtually no substance to them. You got an idea of who he was and where he stood, even if he only knew how to articulate it through ad hominems. On the same token, our few direct exchanges always made him seem like a pretty down to earth and personable guy.

I can't say I'll miss him, but I would have a beer with him.

 

[seed_time_harvest]

i guess it was because he is a bit rough around the edges in his posts.... and language may have been not so nice in some posts... But he gets fired up on topics

Would you agree that Its okay to cross the rules occasionally when a liked person becomes emotional to the point of temporarily losing self control?

 

[seed_time_harvest]

Lets just make the assumption you're talking about me.Lets just take a wild guess. Im a long way from the only one who has called you out on your behavior. Even depleted called you out. So there are no jabs being thrown. You do nothing but over talk and insult anyone who disagrees with you,all one has to do is look at your posts. You told me once you are dogmatic,well Id call it ignorant. So no jabs being thrown.Im telling you directly,I think you stir up trouble,I think you are nasty to those that disagree with you and I think you're whole attitude is unChristlike. Now we're clear.

After reading your post I looked at your avatar and It seems like that dog Is saying" Oh,you again"lol

 

[kaylagrl]

That was the hypocrisy. You tell other people what they should or shouldn't do, while not doing it yourself.

Now that that is on the table, where is my hypocrisy?

​How's that?...

 

[kaylagrl]

After reading your post I looked at your avatar and It seems like that dog Is saying" Oh,you again"lol

Rofl people are getting a lot of things out of that little dog and her attitude. She's quite a little rascal and people pick it up in her picture.

 

[preacher4truth]

The right thing to do then Is not trust the moderators and give everyone that we like,more chances,right?

There are some I don't know who have been banned. If a person isn't an outright troll, then perhaps all should be given a second chance. No need to try to be snarky, smart-alecked, or try pick a fight with me over it. Be Christian today instead maybe?

 

[preacher4truth]

Lets just make the assumption you're talking about me.Lets just take a wild guess. Im a long way from the only one who has called you out on your behavior. Even depleted called you out. So there are no jabs being thrown. You do nothing but over talk and insult anyone who disagrees with you,all one has to do is look at your posts. You told me once you are dogmatic,well Id call it ignorant. So no jabs being thrown.Im telling you directly,I think you stir up trouble,I think you are nasty to those that disagree with you and I think you're whole attitude is unChristlike. Now we're clear.

More mud slinging, hate and look who is stirring up trouble. How many threads will you dog my steps to show your disdain?

If you can't handle being refuted, or you cannot handle sound doctrine that readily dismantles your errors, then don't engage with those types. Stick with those who believe in your errant theology. You've behaved this way to SEVERAL on here who have dismantled your errant, cut and paste theology. You've gotten nasty with them and many have shown you have not told the truth concerning them.

And it continues in your above post, which frankly is why you're on ignore. Yep, I saw your nasty attack quoted by another person.

For the record your accusations are unproven - this is how those I disagree with react because I disagree with them. Happens time and again. To you proving you wrong is talking over you. It is IMPOSSIBLE to talk over a person on a forum, that is just more drummed up nonsense intended to belittle another and falsely accuse.

Now, please go show us where I've behaved in the manner in which you accuse. I'll be waiting.

And you can have the last word.

 

[TemporaryCircumstances]

I loved Utah....sigh......

 

[Depleted]

Mods, PLEASE close this thread... :/

Utah isn't here anymore to defend himself..

I wasn't here anymore either, but it kept on going. And it keeps on going.

 

[Depleted]

​How's that?...

Yep,I skip over what you say unless its directed at me. Preacher can defend himself. Ive never put anyone on ignore,thats my choice. Hypocrisy goes both ways and I feel the same about you. So we've got that on the table. Where we end this will be the question. You said the friendship was over so lets drop it.I wont mention you,you dont mention me and we'll ignore each others posts.Done.Problem solved.

I can go with three bouts of hypocrisy, but let's just go with the second one, since this is the one I was pointing out.

Well, I know that feeling. Someone on here would love to see me banned. She is sometimes trying to goad me into a trap. Sucks.

I dont know who you're talking about but the best thing is to put them on ignore. Dont let people draw you in. Some people like to play games,just tune them out.

I actually missed where he said liberals should die and perhaps that got him banned.I certainly dont believe that should ever be said.I disagree with liberals but have friends that are both Christian and liberal. So that should have never been said by Utah. As I said before,mods have their reasons.


Someone said Utah had used bad language and I said several here had and not been banned.And the fact is several have and I understand why. Any visit to the BDF is enough to make any saint swear thats for sure. Why he was banned doesn't matter.I liked him,he was funny,we got along.Period.As far as jabs whatever I say is going to be pulled apart and taken personally. If you dont like what I say block me. You can skip over my posts and not read them.Lots of options.

You're big into telling other people what to do, even if you don't do any of them.

Sooo, again, where is my hypocrisy?

 

[1ofthem]

There are some I don't know who have been banned. If a person isn't an outright troll, then perhaps all should be given a second chance. No need to try to be snarky, smart-alecked, or try pick a fight with me over it. Be Christian today instead maybe?

Wow, you got that upset from a guy just saying we should give people more chances...

That was a little too dramatic, even for yourself... don't ya think?

 

[kaylagrl]

More mud slinging, hate and look who is stirring up trouble. How many threads will you dog my steps to show your disdain?

If you can't handle being refuted, or you cannot handle sound doctrine that readily dismantles your errors, then don't engage with those types. Stick with those who believe in your errant theology. You've behaved this way to SEVERAL on here who have dismantled your errant, cut and paste theology. You've gotten nasty with them and many have shown you have not told the truth concerning them.

And it continues in your above post, which frankly is why you're on ignore. Yep, I saw your nasty attack quoted by another person.

For the record your accusations are unproven - this is how those I disagree with react because I disagree with them. Happens time and again. To you proving you wrong is talking over you. It is IMPOSSIBLE to talk over a person on a forum, that is just more drummed up nonsense intended to belittle another and falsely accuse.

Now, please go show us where I've behaved in the manner in which you accuse. I'll be waiting.

And you can have the last word.

Take a look back,your comments came after mine,so Im not dogging you,but it seems you are me.You stir up trouble in every thread you're in so I wouldn't talk about mud slinging or hate.


I can handle being refuted,you're the one who cant handle sound doctrine. You dont see me in threads on Pentcostals screaming how they're all liars and picking on me because they dont believe in tongues. Roger doesn't believe tongues are for today and I often hit like on his comments even though I disagree with him on tongues,a lot of other things he posts he's dead right on. Plenty of people I disagree with on here on one thing and agree or another yet we can agree on some things. Ive never had any major issue with anyone here till you and when I disagreed with Calvinists/Reformed.

--You've behaved this way to SEVERAL on here who have dismantled your errant, cut and paste theology.


Nope,just Calvinists who didn't like what I said. Copy/paste is done by everyone here and is not against CC rules.Your attitude however...


--You've gotten nasty with them and many have shown you have not told the truth concerning them.


Nope again,just Calvinists who didn't like what I had to say and dog piled on me. Im not the only one who have had this issue in those particular threads either trying to get down to the truth on what Calvinists believe.

I dont care what you saw or see on ignore. You dont care how you speak to other people,I really dont care what you dont like about me. So you need to save your breath.


You know exactly how you act to those who disagree with you.Even Lynn called you a liar. I haven't,but you are ignorant to people who disagree with you.Time will tell if others are going to let you continue with your foolishness. Was it you that got into an argument with a mod,of was that someone else?

 

[1ofthem]

More mud slinging, hate and look who is stirring up trouble. How many threads will you dog my steps to show your disdain?

If you can't handle being refuted, or you cannot handle sound doctrine that readily dismantles your errors, then don't engage with those types. Stick with those who believe in your errant theology. You've behaved this way to SEVERAL on here who have dismantled your errant, cut and paste theology. You've gotten nasty with them and many have shown you have not told the truth concerning them.

And it continues in your above post, which frankly is why you're on ignore. Yep, I saw your nasty attack quoted by another person.

For the record your accusations are unproven - this is how those I disagree with react because I disagree with them. Happens time and again. To you proving you wrong is talking over you. It is IMPOSSIBLE to talk over a person on a forum, that is just more drummed up nonsense intended to belittle another and falsely accuse.

Now, please go show us where I've behaved in the manner in which you accuse. I'll be waiting.

And you can have the last word.

Could you please repeat that because all I heard was....drama, drama, drama, drama, drama....LOL