Jesus is the Only begotten Son of God, read this and decide
- Thread starter followjesus
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
So what you are telling me is I better step back because I am a woman?
is that what you are trying to say?
because that is what Paul was telling Timothy about women teaching
even though we know that in CHRIST there is no longer male or female
In any case sir, before the fall NO..Adam did not rule over Eve.
is that what you are trying to say?
because that is what Paul was telling Timothy about women teaching
even though we know that in CHRIST there is no longer male or female
In any case sir, before the fall NO..Adam did not rule over Eve.
Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created. Gen 5:2
Of course that didn't mean their name was Adam since those who can't admit they were wrong will agrue that in Genesis 5:2 that God called their name mankind. Yet if the female's name was Eve before the fall then why it written after the fall that Adam call his wife's name Eve as written in Genesis 3:20?
Last edited:
I know Ezekiel 28 but the fact remains you hadn't read the text given you, then answered as if you had. Nor are you able to concede it refutes your position in honor of the Word of God.
In fact you'll most likely continue on in opposition to it never admitting your error or accepting its correction. It plainly refutes you, humbly admit it and accept it. If you will not it says much.
In fact you'll most likely continue on in opposition to it never admitting your error or accepting its correction. It plainly refutes you, humbly admit it and accept it. If you will not it says much.
I have no error sir
again
it was after the fall that GOD said that the woman's desire would be for her husband and he would rule over her
but you are right according to 1 Timothy 2
do not suffer a woman to teach
and that is what I am
i am right but you are a man and want to push your authority
i hope you knoe ehat you are doing
again
it was after the fall that GOD said that the woman's desire would be for her husband and he would rule over her
but you are right according to 1 Timothy 2
do not suffer a woman to teach
and that is what I am
i am right but you are a man and want to push your authority
i hope you knoe ehat you are doing
Last edited:
Genesis 2:18
Adonai, God, said, “It isn’t good that the person should be alone. I will make for him a companion suitable for helping him.”
This was before the fall, that God made Eve as a help for Adam....It was after the fall, as you say, that God said her desire would be for him. So I guess we're right.
Adonai, God, said, “It isn’t good that the person should be alone. I will make for him a companion suitable for helping him.”
This was before the fall, that God made Eve as a help for Adam....It was after the fall, as you say, that God said her desire would be for him. So I guess we're right.
You have much error.
It is noted you only go to portions of Scripture in 1 Timothy 2:12-13 you can come against only because you disagree with God Himself. Plainly the text teaches that since Adam was created first he was always the head of woman. This was before the fall so you're incorrect.
But you go past that part only to offer disagreement about women teachers, something Paul shows as unbiblical. Then you accuse me of trying to be pushy which frankly is you lying and showing yourself as rebellious and rejecting authority.
The fact remains: You disagree with God's Word.
Man has always been the head of woman, and rightfully so women are not to teach over a man. Yes, you don't like that but that is too bad, God has spoken and you're in error.
It is noted you only go to portions of Scripture in 1 Timothy 2:12-13 you can come against only because you disagree with God Himself. Plainly the text teaches that since Adam was created first he was always the head of woman. This was before the fall so you're incorrect.
But you go past that part only to offer disagreement about women teachers, something Paul shows as unbiblical. Then you accuse me of trying to be pushy which frankly is you lying and showing yourself as rebellious and rejecting authority.
The fact remains: You disagree with God's Word.
Man has always been the head of woman, and rightfully so women are not to teach over a man. Yes, you don't like that but that is too bad, God has spoken and you're in error.
Last edited: