Many people are not educated in biblical matters. Many Christians who think they are educated are skeptical of speaking in tongues. If they were educated, they would not be.It can indeed be a hindrance to the gospel especially in this day and age where people are more educated and more skeptical.
I hope that the Christian church comes to understand what speaking in tongues is, know that they can do it, and do it more than ever before.I find it so interesting that tongues became so prevalent after 1909, in the United States (Topeka Kansas), as in unintelligible speech, and before that for hundred of years was not practiced in the churches.
Tongues can be either a language of men or of angels (1 Cor 13:1).That should be an indication right there that it is not an angelic language.
Where do people get the idea that people who speak in tongues are highly emotional, or that speaking in tongues makes people emotional? Why do people sometimes call it "ecstatic languages"? People can speak in tongues in whatever mental state they happen to be in, whether joyful or not. Speaking in tongues does not make a person emotional or giddy.It has been studied extensively by linguists. The neurosciences is pretty clear it releases endorphins.
This high emotional state is nearly always present when people begin to speak in modern tongues for the first time and afterward in their emotional "worship services and practice of modern tongues. People are susceptible to a suggestion which stimulates a mental response. When the person is having a stimulating emotional experience, whatever the source, it often produces a pleasant feeling. Scientists tell us that the body releases endorphins and other chemicals that are natural pain killers, and they give one a natural "high" or pleasant feeling.
That "Bible-truth" website does not know Bible truth. It's just another cessationist website speaking against things they do not understand. They're a dime a dozen.Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania took brain images of five women while they spoke in tongues. They reported the activity came from the frontal lobes of the brain,". . .and found the frontal lobes; the thinking, willful part of the brain through which people control what they do; were relatively quiet, as were the language centers. The regions involved in maintaining self-consciousness were active. 5
I'm sorry, but that's just a crock of kaka. Speaking in tongues is produced by an act of the will, not emotion. A person makes a conscious decision to speak in tongues, and he begins speaking. The words come from the gift of Holy spirit. A person does not need to be emotional or joyful to speak in tongues.It is significant that what these women were doing was not speaking in an unlearned language. The language center of their brains was inactive, but the phenomena of modern tongues speaking was being produced by the emotional region of the brain.
Your source has no clue "what is really going on".Goodman concludes that "when all features of glossolalia were taken into consideration -- that is, the segmental structure (such as sounds, syllables, phrases) and its supra segmental elements (namely, rhythm, accent, and especially overall intonation) -- she concluded that there is no distinction in glossolalia between Christians and the followers of non-Christian (pagan) religions. The "association between trance and glossolalia is now accepted by many researchers as a correct assumption," writes Goodman in the prestigious Encyclopedia of Religion (1987).
Modern Tongues Speaking Explained - What is really going on? By Cooper P Abrams III
or you can do the research in a reputable neuroscience journal.
I do not understand why so many Christians simply do not believe what the Bible says. They go out of their way to find websites that discredit speaking in tongues, and go with that rather than what the Bible says.
What the heck are you afraid of?
To paraphrase Paul in Acts 19, did you received the holy spirit into manifestation when you believed? If not why not?
