Help a Catholic understand Protestantism better please

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
W

WimpyPete

Guest
I would also like to point out the "Christian virtues" you displayed in the comment Magenta was responding to were off the chart wholesome as well. If we just drop the sarcasm then these exchanges would go so much better.
Yeah, I followed that rather cynical post with a sincere apology, so I don't argue with you there, thanks for keeping me honest.

Just two questions:

How is it that you say that the Church which called the council of Carthage (as well as the council of Hippo, the other council which affirmed the Cannon), is different than the Catholic Church which exists today?

Also, relatedly, if you do acknowledge that this truly was the council which gave us the Canon, which I agree with, how is it that you see this council's action as being authoritative? Obviously you already cave the criteria which would have been used to assess the individual books, but the point is that both the criteria and the council are extra-biblical realities that just don't fit in with the criteria of a strict sola-scriptura. It seems like to accept the authority of a church council you would first have to believe that "the church of the living God" is "the pillar and ground of the truth" (1 Tim 3:5).

Thanks for the good reply
 
Feb 28, 2016
11,311
2,972
113
you are very 'transparent', and your home-made psychology is just, well, 'home-made-up,
and very deceitful...and yes, we understand, inherited...well, we all have to grow up sometime,
and seek and study and trust our Holy Saviour, and His Holy Words, and the 'none' that were
added for the sake of sacking...

it really is so very sad to see where all of this 'new-age' thought is so desperately trying to
nullify, 'Let this mind be in you, which is in Christ Jesus'...
 
Last edited:
D

Depleted

Guest
I'm back. This was my last day until I get the other knee replaced, so I think she tried to kill me today as a going-away present. I think I'm going to hit the bed for awhile.
Off-topic, but seems needed:
Willie, from our experiences, it seems PTs like to make you work harder than you think you can specifically so you are motivated to go back when you're feeling better to kick their hineys. However, somewhere along the way, by the time you're ready to go back to kick them, you go back to thank them.

I suspect you know this already, but I wanted to give you one other motivation. For months and months I looked down the halls to see other people doing what I wanted hubby to do. When he was getting better, he looked down the halls to see the same thing.

And when he was in therapy, he saw a guy who had a joint replaced come in, right smack in the middle of him sweating to the newbies, (PT. Much younger people, so they listen to the new stuff), and do a little jig to prove the therapy worked. That was the moment that hubby set his sites to that goal.

Be that guy! The guy who does the dancing to prove therapy works. Amazing what that does to motivate the ones who are still deciding which hiney they want to kick -- their own or the therapists. lol

(Will be praying for you and Mrs. Willie too.)
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,370
113
unless you know the heart of a person, regardless of their
denomination, it is not up to you to speculate or condemn
anyone.
I am not condemn, I try to love by saying you walk toward gorge brother, please change your direction, please go to real Jesus.
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,370
113
Hey guys, guess what?! All of your angry bashing of Catholicism, your telling me how uninformed I am, how wicked the Catholic Church is, and how little I know God has really convinced me. I am going to leave the Catholic Church and join one of your denominations!

The only problem is, I don't know which one to join? Could someone help me know how it is that I am supposed to know who is right between you all?

You have convinced me that I ought to follow the Bible alone but I just don't know how to interpret it (as you have proven). How can I be sure that I am understanding it correctly?

Also you got me worried when you mentioned some people adding books to the Bible, others subtracting them, so I want to know, how can I know for sure which books are even in the Bible? Since I don't know the Bible well, could you please tell me what passage in the Bible gives the list of the correct books?

Also I am trying to find the passage where Jesus told us all to go out and read our Bibles for ourselves and just have an individual relationship with Him based on my own subjective experience. I found some stuff about Him calling the Apostles together and forming a group of disciples and His commissioning them to go out to fulfill the mission of Israel as the New Israel bearing His own authority, but that is about all I coould come up with.

Anyways if you could help me out with this that would be great. It's just hard being so ignorant and knowing so little about God, which is why I am thankful for helpful Christians like you all!
Hi brother WimpyPete

I myself not an expert, but being a Christian from childhood this is a summary what I get from listening thousands of preaching and hours of reading

1. Your do joint this forum, it is good start.
2. Jesus promise to send Holy Spirit to guide us. Because this promise, please read the Bible, and ask Holy Spirit to help you understand when you have a problem to understand. He is trust worthy as long as we sincerely He will kept His promise and Holy Spirit will teach you to understand His will.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
Heh, yeah, it is a great story. Ok well nevermind then, it appears you already believe that human freedom has a role in the process, that is what I was going to ask. From what I can tell Luther did not believe that (i.e. The bondage of the will), and I am having a hard time determining if Calvin did either, he seems to make statements that could go in either direction.

Anyways, more to the point of the example you gave, the question I supposed I would have is this. While the juridical example you gave is definitely logical in its own right, do you think that it is the correct lens through which to interpret the Gospel? I know Calvin was a lawyer so a lot of his work has a bit of that bent to it. My question is, it seems like the logic of "justice" in the New Testament is a bit different. While you have the pedagogical progressions in the Old Testament, slowly moving towards an eye for an eye justice, it seems Jesus hopes to push it further in the NT, thus we have things such as "if someone wants to take your tunic, give them your cloak as well" (MT 5:41), "love your enemies, pray for your persecutors" (MT 5:44), "return a curse with a blessing" (1 Pet 3:9) etc.

Now I know you are obviuosly in favor of all of these passages, I guess I am just wondering, certainly we believe that if God commands this much from us it is because this too is how He Is correct? ("Be perfect as your heavenly Father is perfect").

All I am getting at is that while its true we can't claim salvation as a right nor pretend to merit it on our own, certainly while an eye for an eye justice might not demand that God offer salvation to all, love would demand such a thing since love desires the good of the other.

I guess I just don't understand how God could not at least extend the possibility of salvation to all.

Maybe you aren't denying any of this, so please just correct me if I am wrong. But maybe you could help me with this. Thanks for all your kind replies.
You're going to have to use 10th grade vocabulary words on me, because a lot of what you wrote went over my head. And... Calvin was a lawyer? I thought he was a monk! :eek:

(Sorry, mark me down as another Calvinist who never read more than two sentences at a time from Calvin. lol)

But I do get bondage of the will and agree with it. Our will is bound to our nature. We have human nature, so we do what is humanistic -- aka self-first! (We are, by very nature, always self-centered. It doesn't matter what we do -- good or bad -- because everything we naturally do is aimed at self-preservation and specifically toward that which goes easiest on us. Even when we try to be good, it's a reward system. We get rewarded in some way for doing good.)

But God is super-nature. His nature is above ours, and isn't our nature at all. (Although, he chose to love people the most out of everything he ever made.)

So let me go with the two analogizes I like to make --
1. Cats are omnivores. Their bodies are such that they need meat, but they also need fiber. And yet, most cats won't eat fiber. Not that they can't eat it. That they won't think to do it. A starving lion will die in a field of wheat. Not because it can't eat wheat. Because it doesn't think to eat wheat.

2. I don't like liver. Can't stand the stuff. And yet, each week I go into the grocery store and go into the meat section to pick out what to eat. Can I chose liver? Sure. Free to do so, but my will was set so long ago on liver, I don't even think of it. I am sure I've passed liver every single week, and yet, I can only remember even seeing the stuff once or twice in the last 39 years. My choices are available. But my will is severed by my choices so long ago so badly that liver just doesn't enter the picture anymore.

In like kind, we love the darkness. Darkness let's us do what we want to do -- serve self! Make self happy. Have self as the center of our universe. God is there just as liver is in that meat section somewhere. We simply have severed any connection to him, so would not choose, nor will to go to God. We will not leave our darkness because... well, whatever reason we give ourselves to think we're fine.

So, yup, bound to that will. And yet, God chooses some to turn on his light. (He dinks the light switch.)

Then, once we're in the light we're with him. And suddenly we see what we're missing, realize we just got off Death Row, and poof! We want to follow him. But the light switch was on him, not on us, even with all the choices we could have made and all that will we ever had.

We go from natural to supernatural, on God's doing.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,760
26,630
113
Magenta thanks for your great patience towards my ignorance, it is not easy being so unintelligent. I am fortunate however to have someone as educated as yourself to help me with this. Do to my great difficulties in learning I wonder if you could help me arrive at the truth one step at a time. I won't be able to handle any more than one topic at once so please do not rush into other topics.

For starters then please just tell me where the Bible came from? And just to clarify on that question, I mean, who was it that decided these particular books are inspired and the many other books of the time were not? I feel that if, as you insist, the Bible must be our sole ground of authority, then I must know where it comes from.

I hope you are willing to assist this poor ignorant sinner. Thank you for your great demonstration of Christian virtues towards me.
Where did I say that Scriptures must be our sole ground of authority? Where did I insist upon this? In fact I specifically stated that the Spirit of Truth will lead you into understanding if you are sincere in seeking, but you show no amount of sincerity in your posts, beyond a sincere desire to mock and scoff. Do you really think you are fooling anyone? Hmm, well, perhaps a few... I am sorry you do not like the truth served straight up. I follow the instruction of Jesus, my yes means yes and my no means no, quite unlike you, who says one thing but means another.

Scriptures come from God. They were delivered first to the Jew. When Christ established His church upon a confession of faith in His Deity, and His propitiatory sacrifice upon the cross, where He took on the penalty and consequence of sin for us due (not do) to His great love for us, that we may attain to life ever after by being born again of the Spirit, and be reconciled to God through the covering of His righteous blood, well, you know little Petie, the RCC did not exist then and did not come into existence until centuries later, and Scriptures were around all that time. I am well aware that Roman Catholics like to pretend that if it were not for them there would be no Scriptures.
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,481
3,521
113
Hey guys, guess what?! All of your angry bashing of Catholicism, your telling me how uninformed I am, how wicked the Catholic Church is, and how little I know God has really convinced me. I am going to leave the Catholic Church and join one of your denominations!

The only problem is, I don't know which one to join? Could someone help me know how it is that I am supposed to know who is right between you all?

You have convinced me that I ought to follow the Bible alone but I just don't know how to interpret it (as you have proven). How can I be sure that I am understanding it correctly?

Also you got me worried when you mentioned some people adding books to the Bible, others subtracting them, so I want to know, how can I know for sure which books are even in the Bible? Since I don't know the Bible well, could you please tell me what passage in the Bible gives the list of the correct books?

Also I am trying to find the passage where Jesus told us all to go out and read our Bibles for ourselves and just have an individual relationship with Him based on my own subjective experience. I found some stuff about Him calling the Apostles together and forming a group of disciples and His commissioning them to go out to fulfill the mission of Israel as the New Israel bearing His own authority, but that is about all I coould come up with.

Anyways if you could help me out with this that would be great. It's just hard being so ignorant and knowing so little about God, which is why I am thankful for helpful Christians like you all!
Please go back to my first reply to you Post 117 and tell me if it was posted in anger and if i was bashing you?

Ok now as you your follow up points..

""The only problem is, I don't know which one to join?"""

The one that conforms to the Message of God... Now if you cannot find one that does that then do not join another denomination.. Your eternal salvation is not based on you gaining membership of the correct denomination.. If one believes God and trusts in the Atonement Jesus secured for their salvation they will be saved.. Church membership or no church membership, makes no differences..

""""You have convinced me that I ought to follow the Bible alone but I just don't know how to interpret it (as you have proven). How can I be sure that I am understanding it correctly? """"

Well thats encouraging to hear.. That you want to follow the Bible alone... The only way to interpret it correctly is to be guided by Gods Holy Spirit.. So i would suggest you ask God for understanding every time you read the Bible or discuss the Bible with others.. God can give us wisdom directly or He can give us insights through others who are also indwelled by the Holy Spirit..


"""""Also I am trying to find the passage where Jesus told us all to go out and read our Bibles for ourselves and just have an individual relationship with Him based on my own subjective experience.""""

Do you believe in the indwelling of the Holy Spirit ? If you do then you must believe that God can communicate with you directly through conviction... (Romans 10:17) "So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God."

So if it is as you say """I don't know the Bible well"""" How can you ever have hope of coming to the Faith?

"""""I found some stuff about Him calling the Apostles together and forming a group of disciples""""

Yes we should have fellowship... I can have fellowship by being a member of christian forums and discussing Christian theology with other Christians.. We come together online and have a lot of in depth discussions like we are doing here... So we need both a personal relationship with God and we also need relationships with brothers and sisters in Faith..
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,481
3,521
113
Magenta I apologize, my last post was not sincere, you are correct. It was totally sarcastic in response to what I perceive as many of the absurd comments that have been given to me in response to my post
Sarcasm is the worst avenue to take for anyone who is seeking truth.... If indeed they are seeking truth.. I advise anyone who is seeking the truth of God to take on a very meek attitude and not to allow pride and anger to get the better of them.. If you want to end all useful communications then engage in sarcasm, it will totally take the enthusiasm anyone has in wanting to discuss things with you and it will totally destroy their belief that you are serious in your search..
 
W

WimpyPete

Guest
To Magenta and also Adstar since you commented, I have already apologized for perhaps not using "gentelness and reverence" when attempting to give a "reason for my hope" (1 Pet. 3:15). Although to be fair, the comment was not meant as pure malice, I was also just having fun and trying to make light of what was becoming an increasingly tense conversation. I'll take the blame though if you want to point it at someone, but I do hope that you all would be willing to reconcile.

If not, I am not interested in arguing. I am sorry that I allowed things to become argumentative, because such form of dialog rarly bears fruit. That being said, I just have 2 last points before closing.

You can believe that I don't know the Bible or the Lord if you want, but please don't think that Catholicism is somehow devoid of Biblical roots. Some of us choose to pray the liturgy of the hours where 5 times a day we pray the psalms, have readings from the Old or New Testament as well as readings from the Church Fathers. Some of us choose to go to mass daily where we read at least 3 if not 4 readings from the Scriptures. If you read any Church document or any of the Churches major theologians you will find works dripping with God's Word; from the earliest writers such as St. Ignatius of Antioch (107AD), St. Irenaeus (202AD) to St. Benedict (547AD), St. Anselm (1109 AD), St. Thomas Aquinas (1274Ad), St. Therese (1879), to the modern day such as Pope Benedict XVI (to name only a few).

Obviously we perhaps disagree on matters of interpretation, but there is no lack of Scriptural familiarity is all I want to say. If it would be of any interest to you, you would be free to inqure about any single Catholic doctrine and I am quite sure I could give you the biblical grounds for it (keeping in mind that we don't believe in sola-scriptura so it doesn't mean that it is the only contributing source of our doctrines, but we don't believe we ever contradict anything in Scripture and everything is always built upon scriptural principles).

Apart from this honest effort to make peace and make a humble defense for a tremendously large group of authentic Christians who whole heartedly do try to love the Triune God I don't have much more to say unless you would like to take me up on my offer to provide biblical background for our teaching. Anyways, the grace and peace of God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ be with you
 
W

WimpyPete

Guest
You're going to have to use 10th grade vocabulary words on me, because a lot of what you wrote went over my head. And... Calvin was a lawyer? I thought he was a monk! :eek:

(Sorry, mark me down as another Calvinist who never read more than two sentences at a time from Calvin. lol)

But I do get bondage of the will and agree with it. Our will is bound to our nature. We have human nature, so we do what is humanistic -- aka self-first! (We are, by very nature, always self-centered. It doesn't matter what we do -- good or bad -- because everything we naturally do is aimed at self-preservation and specifically toward that which goes easiest on us. Even when we try to be good, it's a reward system. We get rewarded in some way for doing good.)

But God is super-nature. His nature is above ours, and isn't our nature at all. (Although, he chose to love people the most out of everything he ever made.)

So let me go with the two analogizes I like to make --
1. Cats are omnivores. Their bodies are such that they need meat, but they also need fiber. And yet, most cats won't eat fiber. Not that they can't eat it. That they won't think to do it. A starving lion will die in a field of wheat. Not because it can't eat wheat. Because it doesn't think to eat wheat.

2. I don't like liver. Can't stand the stuff. And yet, each week I go into the grocery store and go into the meat section to pick out what to eat. Can I chose liver? Sure. Free to do so, but my will was set so long ago on liver, I don't even think of it. I am sure I've passed liver every single week, and yet, I can only remember even seeing the stuff once or twice in the last 39 years. My choices are available. But my will is severed by my choices so long ago so badly that liver just doesn't enter the picture anymore.

In like kind, we love the darkness. Darkness let's us do what we want to do -- serve self! Make self happy. Have self as the center of our universe. God is there just as liver is in that meat section somewhere. We simply have severed any connection to him, so would not choose, nor will to go to God. We will not leave our darkness because... well, whatever reason we give ourselves to think we're fine.

So, yup, bound to that will. And yet, God chooses some to turn on his light. (He dinks the light switch.)

Then, once we're in the light we're with him. And suddenly we see what we're missing, realize we just got off Death Row, and poof! We want to follow him. But the light switch was on him, not on us, even with all the choices we could have made and all that will we ever had.

We go from natural to supernatural, on God's doing.
I'm sorry if I wasn't clear, and thank you for your examples regarding your understanding of the human will, it helps me understand a bit more how you see things. The point I was trying to get at in my last point though was more about how to understand God. I gave those few Scripture examples to show what kind of "justice" God desires us to live; that is to say, that He calls us to an extremely (divinely!) high form of charity. He says that His love to the absolute end on the cross should be the norm for the love we show even to our enemies. So to simplify: God wants us to live out tremendous charity.

The reason I made that point is because we can know that if that is what God desires for us, that is to be "perfect as He is perfect", then it tells us something of His own boundless charity.

The reason I make that point is because I think that this charity is the best lense through which to understand God (given that that IS what He is according to John). And so my point would be the quetion, can a God who would freely deny someone the possibility of heaven, or we could say, that would freely choose not to save some, really be a charitible God? Perhaps it could be said that by "justice" God does not "owe" us salvation, but certainly by "charity" He would desire to save all those He has created, since He "hates nothing that He has made" (Wis. 11:24).

Now of course this does not include people who would freely choose to reject Him and thereby condemn themselves by their own choice. I mean that as Calvin seems to understand, and perhaps yourself, God simply has not willed to save certain persons. It just seems hard to believe that the God that runs to meet the prodigal son would also leave (or better cast) other sons out into the eternal darkness where there is wailing and grinding of teeth.

Maybe this just confuses the matter more, sorry if I am still not clear
 

Katy-follower

Senior Member
Jun 25, 2011
2,719
155
63
I believe all churches and denominations have their own flaws and deviations from certain biblical principles and doctrines.

The Catholic denomination is the largest in the world so it gets the most bad press, that's just the way it is. Most of those that bash Catholics have little or no understanding about this denomination, it's just easier for them to go with the flow as they feel safer in large crowds that agree with everything they say.

OK, there is no such thing as a Catholic Christian. Is there any such thing as a Baptist Christian? Or a Methodist Christian? Or any other faith? Based on the hateful mean spirited rhetoric that some members use I would have to say that by their own logic or reasoning there is not and therefore we are all going to hell.

There are serious flaws in the Catholic religion but the thing is that during each and every mass they acknowledge the Father, Son and Holy Spirit as being God, and that by Jesus dying for their confessed sins that they are now forgiven. This statement of faith is called the Apostles Creed. I have attended many other churches and denominations that are bible based but that they do not say something similar during each service. Perhaps they're not really Christians either.
I don't agree with this. Many on this site used to be Catholic, so they're familiar with catholic doctrine. It's not that believers just go with the flow. Anyone with the truth will speak out against false teachings and false gospels. When you love the truth, you hate the lie (not the person). How can there be compromise?

Sure, many denominations differ on non salvational things (like rapture/no rapture), but when you get down to it, Catholicism is a completely separate religious system, not really classed as a christian denomination, because they teach a different gospel. This is why there is no unity with Catholicism. It's like chalk and cheese.

Many profess Jesus (catholic or protestant), without ever having had that inner change. We see that on judgement day many will profess, only to be told they were never His. One can only worship God in Spirit and in truth.

There's more to the catholic mass than you probably realize. It's not simply done in remembrance (as the scriptures tell us it should be). It's often referred to as the "sacrificial mass" as it's viewed as a (non bloody) re-sacrifice of Jesus repeatedly for sins. The priests believe they have the power and authority to bring Jesus down from the right hand of the Father (that Jesus obeys the priest's commands), to be offered repeatedly in the form of the Eucharist wafer. This is a rejection of Jesus' ONE perfect sacrifice, as being sufficient to save a person.

It's difficult for many to grasp the concept of having empty hands of faith... especially when they continually submit to the teachings of ANY religious system, because they believe certain things are necessary for salvation. These religions offer chains, when Christ wants to set us free from all of that.


I'm reminded of these two scriptures. Maybe they will speak to the OP/WimpyPete....


Hebrews 10:11-18: "And every priest stands ministering daily and offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God, from that time waiting till His enemies are made His footstool. For by one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified.

But the Holy Spirit also witnesses to us; for after He had said before, “This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, says the Lord: I will put My laws into their hearts, and in their minds I will write them,” then He adds, “Their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more.” Now where there is remission of these, there is no longer an offering for sin"


Hebrews 7:26-28: "For such a High Priest was fitting for us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and has become higher than the heavens; who does not need daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifices, first for His own sins and then for the people’s, for this He did once for all when He offered up Himself. For the law appoints as high priests men who have weakness, but the word of the oath, which came after the law, appoints the Son who has been perfected forever"
 
Apr 15, 2017
2,867
653
113
Hello, I am a Catholic, I come in peace simply seeking understand Protestant thought a bit more from Protestants themselves.

This is what I understand of Protestant anthropology and soteriology, at least according to the primary reformers i.e. Luther and Calvin. Please let me know if I am correct:

The original sin of Adam and Eve destroyed the goodness of man's nature and thereby destroyed the ability of his reason to know God or supernatural things, and also destroyed the freedom of his will thereby rendering him incapable of free moral actions.

Because of man's total depravity of mind/will he is unable to participate in any way in his salvation and thus salvation is a matter of grace alone.

Now the consequence of this which Luther never seems to deny and Calvin affirms outright is that because salvation is by grace ALONE then the difference between those who are saved and those who are damned depends not on human responsibility but on God, hence Calvin's doctrine of predestination.

My first question is, have I understood this correctly?

Secondly my question is this: How does such a theory avoid altering radically both God and man in such a way that God seems to be unavoidably monsterous for creating people who have absolutelly no chance of salvation, and man seems to no longer be a responsible moral agent since he can neither know the good nor does he have any power (even assisted by grace) to co-operate in doing good? If man does not even have the power to co-operate how can we speak of him as a responsible moral agent? And if God, as Calvin insists, is ultimately the only agent in human actions, how is it that man and not God is responsible for sin?

If someone can please help me to understand better I would appreciate it, thanks
Joh 1:9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.

1Ti 2:3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
1Ti 2:4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.

Rev 22:17 And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.

God did not choose who would be saved,and who would not be saved,in the beginning without their input,for God wants all people to come to the truth,and be saved.

To say that God chooses who will be saved is saying that God's kingdom is not based on love,because they only acknowledge God because they were chose to do it,seeing no other alternative,which is not true love.

To say that God does not choose who will be saved is saying that God is evil to condemn people that have no input in the matter.

It goes against the nature of God,for His kingdom is love,and He is good.

No person comes to the Son except the Father draw them,and no person says Jesus is Lord,but by the Holy Ghost.

Many are called,but few are chosen,for God does the calling,and choosing on earth,and God gets the glory for without God interceding in their life they would not get to the decision point to where salvation happens,but it has to be the person to make the final push through the door,because God's kingdom is love.

God calls things that have not happened yet,as though they already happened,for if it is a plan of God to happen in the future,it is the same as if it happened in the beginning,for it will surely come to pass with no hindrances.

The Lamb was slain from the foundation of the world.The prophets blood shed from the foundation of the world.All the works was finished from the foundation of the world.Although they were future events.

God had the plan to give mankind salvation before He laid down the foundation of the world,so it is the same as if they have salvation in the beginning,although it was a future event to those that chose salvation.

Anybody can have salvation,and we have a choice in the matter.

The same as the Word was in the beginning,and the Word was God,and the Word is God manifest in the flesh.

The Word was in the beginning as a plan of God to come in the future in flesh,but did not come to reality until Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit.

The Lamb was slain from the foundation of the world,but did not come to reality until Jesus shed His blood on the cross.

The saints have salvation in the beginning,but did not come to reality until the future to those that chose salvation.

God is love,and not evil,and we have a choice concerning our salvation.

All have sinned,and come short of the glory of God.There is none that does good,no,not one.God is no respecter of persons,but all that call upon Him shall be saved.Our righteousness is as filthy rags.The Bible says what makes you to differ from another person.All sin is unrighteousness.

All people are in the same category as sinners,so God is not going to choose who will be saved,and not saved,for there is no difference between them in the sinning category to put one above another,and all sin is unrighteousness,and God said there is no difference between the Jew,and Gentile.

God wants all people to be saved,and we have the choice in the matter,because God's kingdom is love,and God is not evil,and all people are sinners in need of salvation.

Adam and Eve sinned,but their sin does not pass to us,for the father shall not bear the sins of the son,and the son shall not bear the sins of the father,but all will bear their own sins.That is Adam and Eve's sin,not our sin.

Adam and Eve would not of sinned unless an outside source tempted them,so God allowed Satan to tempt Eve,and then Eve tempted Adam by showing him it was alright to eat the fruit,because she did not die.

Adam and Eve were created knowing God,but when they sinned then they had a choice between good and evil,so all their offspring,the rest of humanity,are born not knowing God,and will do wrong before they come to God in the truth,so we are sinners in need of salvation.

The angels always behold the face of the Father for the little ones,and that is because babies are innocent of any sin,for Adam and Eve's sin does not apply to them,and they have not sinned,until later on when they sin,and are at the age of acountability,they they are a sinner.

Some people confuse faith alone,not saved by works,with faith without works is dead,and a person is justified by works,and not faith alone.

Faith alone,not saved by works,when we confess Christ,for we are in the flesh,and that is all we can do.

Faith without works is dead,and a person is justified by works,and not faith alone,after they receive the Spirit,for then the responsibility falls on them to keep right with God,for He will not twist their arm to live right,and act like Christ,which work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

Some people say they cannot abstain from sin,but the Bible says a Spirit led life will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh,and have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts,for if they hate sin,and do not want sin,by the Spirit they can abstain from sin,and when they are tempted,God will not put on them more than they can bear,so they can endure it,and will give them an escape from the temptation.

They sin because they want to sin,not because they cannot abstain,and nobody is forcing them to sin,and they can choose the good,and not do the evil.

It is an excuse on their part.

They say sin does not affect their relationship with God,but this is not true.

Heb 3:12 Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God.
Heb 3:13 But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.

Jas 1:12 Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.
Jas 1:13 Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man:
Jas 1:14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
Jas 1:15 Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.
Jas 1:16 Do not err, my beloved brethren.

1Jn 3:10 In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.

Heb 10:26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
Heb 10:27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

Sin does affect our relationship with God,and when we are saved we might sin,but it can be forgiven,and if we hold unto sin for a year it can be forgiven,and sin can be forgiven at any time,but if we hold unto sin then the blood of Jesus cannot wash it away,until we get rid of the sin.

We cannot abstain from sin,and sin does not affect our relationship with God,is not true,so why do people think they believe that.

Not everybody wants to repent of all sins,but hold unto some,and then have an excuse that they are still right with God.

They have a form of godliness,but they deny the power thereof.

God wants all people to be saved,and a person is justified by works,and not faith alone,for God will not twist our arm to live for Him,and live right,so we have the responsibility to keep ourselves right by making the choice to allow the Spirit to lead us,and act like Christ,for quench not the Spirit,and work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

For many are called,but few are chosen,for we have a choice,and God calls many people to follow Him,so God works with them to get them to the truth,but few are chosen for not everybody comes to the truth concerning salvation,for those that name the name of Christ has to depart from iniquity,but not everybody wants to do that,but hold unto sin,and say they are alright with God.

But Jesus said,not everybody that says,Lord,Lord,shall enter heaven,for they did not do the will of the Father,for they were workers of iniquity,not understanding that they have to abstain from sin,but held unto sin thinking they were alright,and the blood of Jesus did not wash it away,and it was on their record.

I might not believe everything the Catholic Church teaches,but at least they take responsibility,faith without works is dead,and these are not works of the flesh,but of the Spirit,which if we do not do those works,then we are being disobedient.

No person comes to the Son unless the Father draws them,and no person says Jesus is Lord,but by the Holy Ghost,but many are called,but few are chosen.

So many will claim Jesus as Lord and Savior,but not all do what is right to be chosen,so then there will be a lot that will be hypocritical,and think they are alright with God,which the Bible says concerning now,will be a very popular belief among a lot of people that claim Christ,that they are lukewarm,hypocritical,that are in to the prosperity Gospel,money,and material things,which God says if they teach that withdraw yourselves from them,and they neglect the poor and needy in which John said,the love of God does not dwell in them,and James said,their faith is dead,amd Paul said,they erred from the faith.

But they will argue with people that do not believe OSAS,as if they are not saved for what they believe,but they claim Jesus as Lord and Savior,that He is God manifest in the flesh,and He is the Christ,the Son of the living God,but how can they do that unless God is operating in their life,and why would be God be operating in their life if they were not chosen in the beginning.

Because there are many that confess Jesus,and say He is Lord,but some are spiritual,and some are fleshy,but can become spiritual if they realize the truth,and get rid of sins,and allow the Spirit to lead them.

If we hold unto sin the blood of Jesus cannot wash away that sin,for we are keeping it instead of getting rid of it.

People need to realize that sin does affect our relationship with God,and sin can be forgiven at any time,but holding unto sin thinking they are alright is the problem,and do not perish from off this earth holding unto sin,for it will be on your record.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
I am not condemn, I try to love by saying you walk toward gorge brother, please change your direction, please go to real Jesus.
Until you understand the local topography, maybe it's good not to assume there is a gorge ahead.

As it stands now, I have no idea if Pete is walking toward a gorge anymore than I know it you are.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
I don't agree with this. Many on this site used to be Catholic, so they're familiar with catholic doctrine. It's not that believers just go with the flow. Anyone with the truth will speak out against false teachings and false gospels. When you love the truth, you hate the lie (not the person). How can there be compromise?

Sure, many denominations differ on non salvational things (like rapture/no rapture), but when you get down to it, Catholicism is a completely separate religious system, not really classed as a christian denomination, because they teach a different gospel. This is why there is no unity with Catholicism. It's like chalk and cheese.

Many profess Jesus (catholic or protestant), without ever having had that inner change. We see that on judgement day many will profess, only to be told they were never His. One can only worship God in Spirit and in truth.

There's more to the catholic mass than you probably realize. It's not simply done in remembrance (as the scriptures tell us it should be). It's often referred to as the "sacrificial mass" as it's viewed as a (non bloody) re-sacrifice of Jesus repeatedly for sins. The priests believe they have the power and authority to bring Jesus down from the right hand of the Father (that Jesus obeys the priest's commands), to be offered repeatedly in the form of the Eucharist wafer. This is a rejection of Jesus' ONE perfect sacrifice, as being sufficient to save a person.

It's difficult for many to grasp the concept of having empty hands of faith... especially when they continually submit to the teachings of ANY religious system, because they believe certain things are necessary for salvation. These religions offer chains, when Christ wants to set us free from all of that.


I'm reminded of these two scriptures. Maybe they will speak to the OP/WimpyPete....


Hebrews 10:11-18: "And every priest stands ministering daily and offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God, from that time waiting till His enemies are made His footstool. For by one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified.

But the Holy Spirit also witnesses to us; for after He had said before, “This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, says the Lord: I will put My laws into their hearts, and in their minds I will write them,” then He adds, “Their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more.” Now where there is remission of these, there is no longer an offering for sin"


Hebrews 7:26-28: "For such a High Priest was fitting for us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and has become higher than the heavens; who does not need daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifices, first for His own sins and then for the people’s, for this He did once for all when He offered up Himself. For the law appoints as high priests men who have weakness, but the word of the oath, which came after the law, appoints the Son who has been perfected forever"
I used to be Catholic -- both before I was saved and after I was saved.

The Lord chooses out of every nation and every religion. Are you really trying to say "No Catholic is saved"? Because, yeah. Really I know a couple. I've been one. And I can say the exact same thing about Methodists, Presbyterians, Baptists, AGers, and a multitude of non-denomers.

Why would God avoid saving people who already go to church? Don't church-goers need as much salvation as non-church-goers? And once they are saved, don't they then want to let their fellow church-goers to become saved too?

Have you tried this same "sermon" in your church?
 
D

Depleted

Guest
Pete,
The real problem your facing is that the owner of this site has told of what he thinks of Catholics, so everyone thinks that makes it open season on anyone who dares say they are Catholic.

So immediately, when the word "Catholic" comes up, particularly in a thread title describing self, then many lock and load before entering.

How to get people to get over the deer-season-opening mentality -- be wimpy for a couple of weeks to a month. (Might take up to three months.) Don't mention Catholic at all. Join in other topics. Get to know people. Be nice. (For heaven's sake, don't go mentioning you've studied anything in great depth. lol) And, then people get to know you a bit more. Some might even like you.

And after that wimpy season is over, ask one question about whatever. Whatever you really want to talk about. Because, honestly? I do think you're a Catholic apologist, and that would be an interesting exchange, if folks didn't have the itch on their trigger finger.

Do know this though. You will always get Magenta's Catholicism: 101 litany.

If you survive on this site for more than three months and do take me up on this idea, PM me. I'm game for it. My only request is you make it in 9th grade reading level, instead of also trying to prove you know big words too. Nothing against knowing big words. I just don't want to have to run to a dictionary all that often, when I could be thinking about whatever it is you want to talk about. I'm not dumb. I too have a degree, however, part of my training was in how to say the same thing in words everyone can understand. So, I never bothered trying to remember the big words.

:)
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
Pete,
The real problem your facing is that the owner of this site has told of what he thinks of Catholics, so everyone thinks that makes it open season on anyone who dares say they are Catholic.

So immediately, when the word "Catholic" comes up, particularly in a thread title describing self, then many lock and load before entering.

How to get people to get over the deer-season-opening mentality -- be wimpy for a couple of weeks to a month. (Might take up to three months.) Don't mention Catholic at all. Join in other topics. Get to know people. Be nice. (For heaven's sake, don't go mentioning you've studied anything in great depth. lol) And, then people get to know you a bit more. Some might even like you.

And after that wimpy season is over, ask one question about whatever. Whatever you really want to talk about. Because, honestly? I do think you're a Catholic apologist, and that would be an interesting exchange, if folks didn't have the itch on their trigger finger.

Do know this though. You will always get Magenta's Catholicism: 101 litany.

If you survive on this site for more than three months and do take me up on this idea, PM me. I'm game for it. My only request is you make it in 9th grade reading level, instead of also trying to prove you know big words too. Nothing against knowing big words. I just don't want to have to run to a dictionary all that often, when I could be thinking about whatever it is you want to talk about. I'm not dumb. I too have a degree, however, part of my training was in how to say the same thing in words everyone can understand. So, I never bothered trying to remember the big words.:)
I wish a lot of the more insecure people on here could learn to do this.
 

Jimbone

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2014
2,758
847
113
44
I used to be Catholic -- both before I was saved and after I was saved.

The Lord chooses out of every nation and every religion. Are you really trying to say "No Catholic is saved"? Because, yeah. Really I know a couple. I've been one. And I can say the exact same thing about Methodists, Presbyterians, Baptists, AGers, and a multitude of non-denomers.

Why would God avoid saving people who already go to church? Don't church-goers need as much salvation as non-church-goers? And once they are saved, don't they then want to let their fellow church-goers to become saved too?

Have you tried this same "sermon" in your church?
I think you're making a good point, and I do believe their can be saved people in the RCC, in the Mormon church, in the JW's, and in Islam, the thing is that once you are saved, reborn in truth, and indwelt by His Spirit then you are on the road out of these false religions. A lot of these "churches" have steep consequences for leaving that make it very hard for people to leave. Not so much in the RCC, but the possibility of losing all your friends, family, and even life in some cases make the decision to leave very hard on the person. I think this is a very important thing to keep in mind when having these discussions, but also understanding the other side can play just as important a role.

What I have come to know, understand, and love about Magenta is she stands firm on truth, and honestly I have come to see truth as the most important thing in life period. In an postmodern age where even claiming there is truth is one of the most hateful things one can do apparently, the thing about that is it's a self defeating position like most "popular opinion" these days. Is it true there is no truth?

I honestly think the "Magenta's Catholicism: 101 litany", is a very good quality of hers, and it's one of the things I appreciate most about her. Don't get me wrong just like anyone else, especially myself, we can get a bit "into" what we are saying and maybe not handle everything in the best way, but there's not 1 of us that is perfect, and even though a lot of people don't like hearing the truth, especially when that truth throws a wrench in our own personal gears and beliefs, I am so thankful there are those out there that do speak it. I think the flip side of this is the folks that are way to soft and so scared to offend someone the truth is lost in political correctness, and honestly think this is by far the much more dangerous side.

I guess I just wanted to put out there how much I appreciate Magenta's stance on truth just as much as I can appreciate your consideration of how other feel or may feel about being presented with that truth.
 
Last edited:
D

Depleted

Guest
I'm sorry if I wasn't clear, and thank you for your examples regarding your understanding of the human will, it helps me understand a bit more how you see things. The point I was trying to get at in my last point though was more about how to understand God. I gave those few Scripture examples to show what kind of "justice" God desires us to live; that is to say, that He calls us to an extremely (divinely!) high form of charity. He says that His love to the absolute end on the cross should be the norm for the love we show even to our enemies. So to simplify: God wants us to live out tremendous charity.

The reason I made that point is because we can know that if that is what God desires for us, that is to be "perfect as He is perfect", then it tells us something of His own boundless charity.

The reason I make that point is because I think that this charity is the best lense through which to understand God (given that that IS what He is according to John). And so my point would be the quetion, can a God who would freely deny someone the possibility of heaven, or we could say, that would freely choose not to save some, really be a charitible God? Perhaps it could be said that by "justice" God does not "owe" us salvation, but certainly by "charity" He would desire to save all those He has created, since He "hates nothing that He has made" (Wis. 11:24).

Now of course this does not include people who would freely choose to reject Him and thereby condemn themselves by their own choice. I mean that as Calvin seems to understand, and perhaps yourself, God simply has not willed to save certain persons. It just seems hard to believe that the God that runs to meet the prodigal son would also leave (or better cast) other sons out into the eternal darkness where there is wailing and grinding of teeth.

Maybe this just confuses the matter more, sorry if I am still not clear
The prodigal son is a son. If Joe Schmoe went running to that same prodigal father, (and, you'll be happy to know I do understand the word "prodigal" lol), Prodigal Dad is not fattening the lamb at the sight of Joe Schmoe in the distance. "Son" means something.

God did not bestow adoption on all. The story of prodicalness, (and yes, I also invent words when needed), was about the relationship between father and son. Both were lavish in their lifestyles. Only the son decided he could go it alone. It is a parable for the backsliders who ask themselves, "Will God forgive me for my stupidity again?"

YES! Because we are his adopted kids. We could always eat the fatted calf. The only ones who weren't eating it were the ones stupid enough to think they could handle it on their own.

Meanwhile, Joe Schmoe is hungry and down-and-out too and runs across the same Prodigal Dad. Since we both know who that Prodigal Dad is, what does he do for Joe? Well, Dad told what we should do, so he's doing the same thing. Joe will get a meal, and a place to sleep that night, if he isn't walking by so fast he doesn't give pause to enjoy them. And Joe can freely glean from the corners of the fields and orchards.

But Joe doesn't usually ask. Only in dying declarations will people ask God for what they need. And what they need isn't always what they need. They will cry out to God in pain, but they want God to fix the pain without touching them any other way. They want the "prodigal" without the commitment of "son." So they don't come to the Prodigal Dad. They come to the Magic Genie.

And "they" is "we." No one chooses God. We like the darkness. (John 3:16-21, special read on 18-20, and then 21 for what God does about 18-20.)

God chooses his adopted kids though. And once chosen, the light lets us see what a great Dad we have.

So you say, "Now of course this does not include people who would freely choose to reject Him and thereby condemn themselves by their own choice."

And I have to ask, "Then who is left?" You're right. We did condemn ourselves by our own choices.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
I think you're making a good point, and I do believe their can be saved people in the RCC, in the Mormon church, in the JW's, and in Islam, the thing is that once you are saved, reborn in truth, and indwelt by His Spirit then you are on the road out of these false religions. A lot of these "churches" have steep consequences for leaving that make it very hard for people to leave. Not so much in the RCC, but the possibility of losing all your friends, family, and even life in some cases make the decision to leave very hard on the person. I think this is a very important thing to keep in mind when having these discussions, but also understanding the other side can play just as important a role.

What I have come to know, understand, and love about Magenta is she stands firm on truth, and honestly I have come to see truth as the most important thing in life period. In an postmodern age where even claiming there is truth is one of the most hateful things one can do apparently, the thing about that is it's a self defeating position like most "popular opinion" these days. Is it true there is no truth?

I honestly think the "Magenta's Catholicism: 101 litany", is a very good quality of hers, and it's one of the things I appreciate most about her. Don't get me wrong just like anyone else, especially myself, we can get a bit "into" what we are saying and maybe not handle everything in the best way, but there's not 1 of us that is perfect, and even though a lot of people don't like hearing the truth, especially when that truth throws a wrench in our own personal gears and beliefs, I am so thankful there are those out there that do speak it. I think the flip side of this is the folks that are way to soft and so scared to offend someone the truth is lost in political correctness, and honestly think this is by far the much more dangerous side.

I guess I just wanted to put out there how much I appreciate Magenta's stance on truth just as much as I can appreciate your consideration of how other feel or may feel about being presented with that truth.
You cannot possibly equate Mormons, JWs and Catholics with Muslims. Three of those religions are based on the Biblical God. One is not.

And the base is where it gets interesting. There's a foothold for climbing up the base of the first three religions to declare the Lord. Sheer -- mirror-smooth -- cliff for Muslims.

Calvin and Luther had no interest in leaving the Catholic Church. The 95 Theses was not a decree of war. It was an act of love. Luther was hitting his own church building with the beauty that is God for others to see.

Some stay to reform, to introduce others to the truth, to find fellowship among their own kind, when frankly, their own kind also includes the small group of like-minded believers. In my first year of being born-again, I found other born-again Catholics. As a babe in Christ, who better to teach me the good and the bad within the religion I grew up in?

They're there as God's missionaries. 600 years later -- and exactly 600 years on October 31st of this year -- and they're still trying to change it within. God bless the ones he gave a heart to stay, because without them, I would probably still be mighty confused between what I learned growing up, and the true doctrines of the Lord.

A friend of hubby -- the same woman who brought him to the Lord -- had a cool experience with Jehovah's Witnesses. They came to her door in the usual manner, and she made them a deal. She would truly listen to everything they wanted to say, even give them some coffee and snacks, in exchange for the exact same amount of time for her to respond to what they said, including more coffee and more snacks. lol

They took her up on her offer and talked with her for... (actually this was 46 years ago, so I don't remember how much time it was, but it was either) 1 or 1.5 hours. And when they were done, she thanked them, headed to the door, locked it, and blocked it, because they were getting ready to leave. Then she reminded them of their promise. And then she spent the same amount of time showing them word for word in the Bible where they got what they believed wrong.

And at the end of her time they bolted, and never returned.

Why didn't they return? Probably because there were more questions that no one in their church could answer. And what happens when that happens? The questions spread. She made a foothold into their beliefs. What became of that? Only God knows, however to avoid those denominations is to avoid missionary work. And avoiding that means we have no idea if some of those people in those churches are or aren't trying to reform from the inside. But, from what I know, I see the cracks.

And those cracks are certainly not coming from those who will shun anyone from those beliefs. And Evil-Catholicism (aka Catholicism: 101, the Evilness of the RCC) is shunning without first finding out if the person being shunned fits into the stereotype. It's also a great way of avoiding telling the gospel.