D
Dagallen
Guest
But you talk as a blind man. As one whose heart is darkened by Satan (2 Cor 4.4-6). The light has not shone through.
This is exactly what I mean, you seek to destroy, so who is the blind one here ?
But you talk as a blind man. As one whose heart is darkened by Satan (2 Cor 4.4-6). The light has not shone through.
Christ makes clear of who's words he spoke but I guess you dont believe or accept the truth, the word you hear is not mine, did he lie ?
Well dagallen, if you want to use that argument then did Thomas lie when he declared and identified Jesus Christ as his "Lord and God" at John 20:28? Did the Apostle Paul lie at Titus 2:13 when he identified Jesus Christ as God? Or how about the Apostle Peter at 2 Peter 1:1 when he said this?
"Simon Peter, a bond-servant and apostle of Jesus Christ, to those who have received a faith of the same kind as ours, by the righteousness OF OUR GOD AND SAVIOR, JESUS CHRIST." So are these Apostle lying dagallen? And it's really apparent that you don't have a "faith of the same kind as ours, now do you dagallen?"
So for a change dagallen, instead bringing up other questions how about addressing why these three Apostles said Jesus Christ is God? This in light of the fact that there is only one God and this one God is the only God we are to worship. Why don't you accept this truth dagallen?
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
Where does scriptures record, Jesus saying, I am God ? It doesn't ! Some say because Jesus said, I am, that he was saying he was God but is that the case ? John 14:24 and the word which you hear is not mine ( so when he said I am, those words was not his own words, so who's words did he speak ) but the Father's which sent me. ( does scriptures teach that Jesus is the Father himself ? No!
Therefore his Father is the ( I am ) ( when he said, the word which you hear is not mine, did he lie ? No !
I do not seek to destroy anyone, my intent to challenge what is posted, to get other to step outside the box thinking, to think with an open mind not a controlled mind. One must read scriptures and let the scriptures walk them back in history, that they may walk through history to where they are but most study scriptures but don't study the historical parts, to study one but not the other is foolish.
OK, whatever, but do you have any view that is biblical and alternative to Trinity? It must not contradict Scriptures and it must take into consideration all Scriptures.
You are similar to somebody attacking the law of gravity, but having no other working explanation of what is experienced.
Do you know what the word ( proverb ) means ? Do you know what the word ( and ) means ? If you don't know the meaning when used, then looking at Hebrews 1:8 would be a waste of time or any other passage. Now the pray of Christ, within it, Christ in no way says that he is God, in it, there is no trinity concept, within it he does not use any of the proverbs but speaks plainly of who the only true God is, who does he show is the only true God ? His Father ! I did not write his pray, however it is what he says it is, you can accept what he says plainly or you can reject what he says plainly, clearly you don't understand what a proverb is or why they were used. John 17: 1 through 26 you really should read it.
Actually bronson, that's not entirely true. God spoke audibly to humans at Exodus 20:22, Exodus 3:4 and at Deuteronomy 5:24 and vs26 which references God speaking audibly to humans at Exodus 3:4. Furthermore, God appeared physcially at Genesis 17:1,2 as well as other places.
The bottom line with dagallen is he flat out denies the deity of Jesus Christ. And one more thing for your information this is not about the Trinity, it's all about who is Jesus Christ. You cannot deny His deity and be a Christian, period.
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
Are you talking to me? What "proverb"? What "pray"?
You are avoiding the answer again,trying to hide behind a nonsense talk.
Let us see if Jaybird is more sincere and has some working alternative to Trinity.
Your interpretation of these texts is wrong.
As human beings and believers in Christ we are NOT part of the Godhead.
We may be part of the Kingdom of God of which Jesus Christ is the head but that does NOT make us divine!
The Trinity is a doctrine about the nature of the divinity of God.
Human beings are never a part of that.
The fact that you do believe that humans are part of the Godhead unmasks a severe problem with your theology...
John17:1 through 26 is the right choice of who is who.
If you interpret John 10 "the Father and I are one," as proof of the Trinity then who would you interpret when Jesus asks believers to be one with Jesus just as the Father and Son are one (also in John 10).
1 John 5
5Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God? 6This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth. 7For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. 8And there are three that bear witness in earth, the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.
Most High is G-D Most High
if John was clearly saying that he would say Jesus is the Most High
Deuteronomy 32:8-9, "The Most High God divided the nations (the Catholic Bible follows the Septuagint better than the Protestant) according to the sons of God. YHWH's portion is Israel."
My interpretation: YHWH can be the Father or the Son (exception is Psalms 110:1). Jesus is the God of Israel (Isaiah 40). Before or after Him there is no other.
The Most High God (the Father) is over all nations.
The third temptation after Jesus' baptism (the devil says to Jesus, "worship me then I will give you all the kingdoms."
A real temptation of bluster? In other words, was Jesus the King of kings or does he become the King of kings after the Most High puts Jesus' enemies under Him? (Psalms 110:1).
My Bible has 66 books (when I do not count DT books), not just several parts from gospels.
If you cant answer my questions and if you cant post any alternative theory to Trinity that does not contradict anything from Scriptures, then this discussion does not seem to have any meaning.
Can you properly and fully define your alternative theory to Trinity?
Thanks.