Attitude of a Pharisee

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#22

So if Jesus came not to call the righteous, but the sinners to repentance.

He that speaketh truth sheweth forth righteousness: but a false witness deceit. Prov 12:17

You still don't get it, do you?

Your first sentence quoted above, means that self-righteous "religious" people are sure they don't need Jesus. That is why He came to call the ones who know they need Him.... sinners.

The second sentence: Yes, speaking truth is the righteous thing to do. But it does not make a person righteous. Remember that we are told in the Bible. "There is no man righteous, no not one."
 

Desertsrose

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2016
2,824
207
63
#23
Well, then refute isn't the proper term then, it means to prove you wrong, so that is what I was reading by your wording. However, I've not once witnessed a WoF refute biblical truth. I utterly abominate that false heresy. Many are deceived by it.
Okay, thanks........I stand refuted! :)

I thought refute meant to disagree. Thanks for the correction!!!

I see what you mean, I don't think they can refute by using the proper definition. They can try, but they fail.
 

Zmouth

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2012
3,391
134
63
#24
You still don't get it, do you?
Get what?, that if the blood of bulls and goats won't save a man of his sins that the blood of a man will?
Your first sentence quoted above, means that self-righteous "religious" people are sure they don't need Jesus. That is why He came to call the ones who know they need Him.... sinners.
11 And when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto his disciples, Why eateth your Master with publicans and sinners?
12 But when Jesus heard that, he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick.
13 But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
Matthew 9:13

Repentance: NT:3340 metanoeo (met-an-o-eh'-o); from NT:3326 and NT:3539; to think differently or afterwards, i.e. reconsider (morally, feel compunction):

The second sentence: Yes, speaking truth is the righteous thing to do. But it does not make a person righteous. Remember that we are told in the Bible. "There is no man righteous, no not one."
Since it is written to prove all things, show where it is written other than in Roman's 3:10.
As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: Rom 3:10

So you going to judge all men based upon your assumption of the truth?

5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth.Luke 1:5-6
6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.

For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not: but the publicans and the harlots believed him: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him. Matt 21:32

The wicked watcheth the righteous, and seeketh to slay him. Ps 37:32

Righteousness keepeth him that is upright in the way: but wickedness overthroweth the sinner. Prov 13:6


Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him! Isa 5:23
 

graceNpeace

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
#25
Get what?, that if the blood of bulls and goats won't save a man of his sins that the blood of a man will?
In other words, for you anyway, Jesus Christ died for nothing!
And it raises another question - Jesus Christ was not just a man!
He was, and still is, fully God in every sense of the word.

The truth is, His sin sacrifice WAS efficacious - this is what the Gospel is actually about!
And His death, as a sin sacrifice, was efficacious for two reasons:
He was firstly obedient to the law in every sense; and
He was divine.
So, as a consequence His death was vicarious and effective as a sin sacrifice!

But, in your world, so it seems, Jesus Christ was just a good man and teacher swept up in events over which He had no control...
 
May 11, 2014
936
39
0
#26
This is a tricky subject. I remember a certain pastor who divorced and then married a divorced woman then called people who critiqued him for it pharisees.
But the irony of the situation was that it was the Pharisees who were arguing in favor of divorce, while Jesus said the opposite. So it was actually the Pharisees who ignored the commandments of the Lord, not Jesus.
 
P

Persuaded

Guest
#27
This is a tricky subject. I remember a certain pastor who divorced and then married a divorced woman then called people who critiqued him for it pharisees.
But the irony of the situation was that it was the Pharisees who were arguing in favor of divorce, while Jesus said the opposite. So it was actually the Pharisees who ignored the commandments of the Lord, not Jesus.
The nature of the Pharisees was that they were more intelligent, had a fuller knowledge of Scripture, were more spiritual than anyone else.
Therefore, their teaching was not to be questioned.
Some on CC have this attitude.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,770
113
#28
Luke 18:9-14
In these verses we see the parable of the Pharisee and the publican.
Verse 9 says "And He spake this parable unto certain which trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others":
The Pharisees of Jesus' day were strict religionists and also believed that they could be saved through law-keeping. But they neglected the weightier matters of the Law -- justice, mercy, and love. Therefore the Lord condemned their hypocrisy. But essentially they did not believe in being saved by grace, but being saved by the works of the Law. Even the ones who were saved could not get rid of the notion that the Law of Moses was still binding on all (Jews or Gentiles) in order to be right with God. As a result Paul was in constant battle with the teachings of the Pharisees within the churches, as evidenced in the epistle to the Galatians.

Applying the term "Pharisee" to Christians who have been saved by grace is neither just nor biblical correct. Many Christians today believe that any Christian who upholds strict moral and behavioral standards is a Pharisee, even though the Bible makes it clear that Christians are indeed to hold themselves to a higher standard, but not judge those who are in the world. At the same time Christians who prefer a lackadaisical Christianity and enjoy keeping one foot in the Church and the other foot in the world condemn their more rigid brethren as "Pharisees". But that is quite inaccurate.

While this OP is condemning Christians who seem to feel that their notions are correct as "Pharisees", the very fact that some Christians call others "Pharisees" is that both sides are judging each other incorrectly and unjustly. No one on a public forum knows the hearts of anyone else. Therefore the best we can do is point out the errors in what they say and their doctrines, and leave the judging to God. Within their own churches and with Christians they know personally, Jesus says "Judge righteously", not "Do not judge at all". How will a Christian brother or sister rebuke another within his own church if he or she fails to judge righteously? And Scripture exhorts us to make such judgments to the point that we have no fellowship with believers who are sinning habitually and refusing to repent.
 
Last edited:
P

Persuaded

Guest
#29
The Pharisees of Jesus' day were strict religionists and also believed that they could be saved through law-keeping. But they neglected the weightier matters of the Law -- justice, mercy, and love. Therefore the Lord condemned their hypocrisy. But essentially they did not believe in being saved by grace, but being saved by the works of the Law. Even the ones who were saved could not get rid of the notion that the Law of Moses was still binding on all (Jews or Gentiles) in order to be right with God. As a result Paul was in constant battle with the teachings of the Pharisees within the churches, as evidenced in the epistle to the Galatians.

Applying the term "Pharisee" to Christians who have been saved by grace is neither just nor biblical correct. Many Christians today believe that any Christian who upholds strict moral and behavioral standards is a Pharisee, even though the Bible makes it clear that Christians are indeed to hold themselves to a higher standard, but not judge those who are in the world. At the same time Christians who prefer a lackadaisical Christianity and enjoy keeping one foot in the Church and the other foot in the world condemn their more rigid brethren as "Pharisees". But that is quite inaccurate.

While this OP is condemning Christians who seem to feel that their notions are correct as "Pharisees", the very fact that some Christians call others "Pharisees" is that both sides are judging each other incorrectly and unjustly. No one on a public forum knows the hearts of anyone else. Therefore the best we can do is point out the errors in what they say and their doctrines, and leave the judging to God. Within their own churches and with Christians they know personally, Jesus says "Judge righteously", not "Do not judge at all". How will a Christian brother or sister rebuke another within his own church if he or she fails to judge righteously? And Scripture exhorts us to make such judgments to the point that we have no fellowship with believers who are sinning habitually and refusing to repent.
I did not call anyone a Pharisee.
Go back and read the verse I quoted.
Go back and read what I said.
I suggested that WE ALL examine ourselves and our ATTITUDE, especially when we respond to others.
 

unobtrusive

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2017
916
25
18
#30
Luke 18:9-14
In these verses we see the parable of the Pharisee and the publican.
Verse 9 says "And He spake this parable unto certain which trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others":
It seem that many on the BDF display this attitude.
Many proclaim themselves as having a greater knowledge and understand of Scripture when others disagree with them.
They suggest that those who disagree with them do not study as much as they do.
Some go so far as to suggest that those who disagree with them as being lost.

I would suggest that all of us examine ourselves and our attitudes.
Good OP. When we understand that we cannot do anything to deserve the grace of God through Christ Jesus, it makes that grace even more profound. We are nothing. All of us. The only thing we can do that makes a real impact is to glorify His Holy Name.

Paul was a Pharisee and he said "For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God." (1 Corinthians 15:9)

He also said to " Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ." (1 Corinthians 11:1)

 
P

Persuaded

Guest
#31
Good OP. When we understand that we cannot do anything to deserve the grace of God through Christ Jesus, it makes that grace even more profound. We are nothing. All of us. The only thing we can do that makes a real impact is to glorify His Holy Name.

Paul was a Pharisee and he said "For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God." (1 Corinthians 15:9)

He also said to " Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ." (1 Corinthians 11:1)

I often must steep back and rethink my response, especially when some question my salvation, how much I study, or my intellect because I disagree with their beliefs.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,770
113
#32
I did not call anyone a Pharisee.
Go back and read the verse I quoted.
Go back and read what I said.
I suggested that WE ALL examine ourselves and our ATTITUDE, especially when we respond to others.
Well here is what I found in the OP, and the title of the thread said
The Attitude of a Pharisee":
Verse 9 says "And He spake this parable unto certain which trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others":
It seem that many on the BDF display this attitude.
 
P

Persuaded

Guest
#33
Well here is what I found in the OP, and the title of the thread said
The Attitude of a Pharisee":
Emphasis ATTITUDE.

And I stand by my statement that some display the ATTITUDE of a Pharisee toward those who disagree with them.
 
P

Persuaded

Guest
#34
If you want to see what I am referring to with this post check out post #71 and #74 in the Melchizadek thread.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,431
0
#35
The nature of the Pharisees was that they were more intelligent, had a fuller knowledge of Scripture, were more spiritual than anyone else.
Therefore, their teaching was not to be questioned.
Some on CC have this attitude.

Well said...and if you disagree with them - they will call you a heretic and they will "stand against those heresies". That you don't know the scriptures like "I do".

I have read the bible 100 times so my understanding of truth should not be questioned. They try to "lord it over your faith" because they dis-agree with others in a non-essential subject. All it does is expose the bitterness and malice they have for others in the body of Christ.


That is Phariseeism at it's finest.

It's just the flesh acting up and this consistently bad behavior shows that these are spiritual babies just like Peter says in 1 Pet. 2:1-2 and it doesn't matter how long one has been a Christian, pastored a church or went to every bible school and seminary in the world. ( all good things but do not manifest maturity in the Lord )
 

J7

Banned
Apr 2, 2017
1,915
13
0
#36
Manmade effort?
Never a truer word spoken!

Now for the million dollar question: is that righteousness that is spoken of a man-made effort or the imputed righteousness offered to us by the blood shed as a sin sacrifice by Jesus Christ Himself?
 

J7

Banned
Apr 2, 2017
1,915
13
0
#37
Romans 3 is addressed specifically to apostate Jews. Not to be universally applied

Get what?, that if the blood of bulls and goats won't save a man of his sins that the blood of a man will?

11 And when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto his disciples, Why eateth your Master with publicans and sinners?
12 But when Jesus heard that, he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick.
13 But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
Matthew 9:13

Repentance: NT:3340 metanoeo (met-an-o-eh'-o); from NT:3326 and NT:3539; to think differently or afterwards, i.e. reconsider (morally, feel compunction):


Since it is written to prove all things, show where it is written other than in Roman's 3:10.
As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: Rom 3:10

So you going to judge all men based upon your assumption of the truth?

5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth.Luke 1:5-6
6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.

For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not: but the publicans and the harlots believed him: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him. Matt 21:32

The wicked watcheth the righteous, and seeketh to slay him. Ps 37:32

Righteousness keepeth him that is upright in the way: but wickedness overthroweth the sinner. Prov 13:6


Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him! Isa 5:23
 

J7

Banned
Apr 2, 2017
1,915
13
0
#38
Matthew 23 23
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,431
0
#39
Here is a typical day in the life of the Lord Jesus Christ - going around destroying the works of the devil and encountering the Pharisee mindset.

Here is a perfect example of religious/Pharisaical ( the word "religious" being used in the negative sense ) people sounding so pious and trying to 'defend their D.I.Y self-righteousness/holiness" and their stand for God and truth in their own minds.

But in effect are grace-haters and grace-fearing too. Jesus encountered it constantly with the self-righteous and He did not have good words to speak to them.


John 9


[SUP]13 [/SUP]They brought to the Pharisees the man who had formerly been blind.


[SUP]14 [/SUP]Now it was a Sabbath day when Jesus made the mud and opened his eyes.

( I'm pretty sure Jesus does this on purpose to expose the self-righteous mindset as a lot of His healings were done on their Sabbath day )


[SUP]15 [/SUP]So the Pharisees again asked him how he had received his sight. And he said to them, “He put mud on my eyes, and I washed, and I see.”

[SUP]16 [/SUP]Some of the Pharisees said, “This man is not from God, for he does not keep the Sabbath.” (typical religious attack ..He doesn't keep the Law....like "we" do....He is lawless ) But others said, “How can a man who is a sinner do such signs?” And there was a division among them.

[SUP]17 [/SUP]So they said again to the blind man, “What do you say about him, since he has opened your eyes?” He said, “He is a prophet.” ( typical response to grace being displayed ..this man being questioned by the self-righteous with an "agenda" in mind)


[SUP]18 [/SUP]The Jews did not believe that he had been blind and had received his sight, until they called the parents of the man who had received his sight

[SUP]19 [/SUP]and asked them, “Is this your son, who you say was born blind? How then does he now see?”

[SUP]20 [/SUP]His parents answered, “We know that this is our son and that he was born blind.
[SUP]
21 [/SUP]But how he now sees we do not know, nor do we know who opened his eyes. Ask him; he is of age. He will speak for himself.”
[SUP]
22 [/SUP](His parents said these things because they feared the Jews, for the Jews had already agreed that if anyone should confess Jesus to be Christ, he was to be put out of the synagogue.)

[SUP]23 [/SUP]Therefore his parents said, “He is of age; ask him.”

[SUP]24 [/SUP]So for the second time they called the man who had been blind and said to him, “Give glory to God. We know that this man is a sinner. ( typical religious sounding words to try to show they care about God's "glory" )[SUP]

25 [/SUP]He answered, “Whether he is a sinner I do not know. One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see.” (typical response from a person that now "sees" the grace and love of Christ in them )

[SUP]26 [/SUP]They said to him, “What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?”

[SUP]27 [/SUP]He answered them, “I have told you already, and you would not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you also want to become his disciples?” ( how many times do grace believers in Christ's work keep saying the same things over and over again? )[SUP]2


8 [/SUP]And they reviled him, saying, “You are his disciple, but we are disciples of Moses. (typical D.I.Y self-righteousness/holiness/Pharisaical types response by saying they are "for God".)

[SUP]29 [/SUP]We know that God has spoken to Moses, but as for this man, we do not know where he comes from.” ( typical Pharisaical D.I.Y righteousness/holiness types response ..we believe "God's word".... it sounds so good...)

[SUP]30 [/SUP]The man answered, “Why, this is an amazing thing! You do not know where he comes from, and yet he opened my eyes.

[SUP]
31 [/SUP]We know that God does not listen to sinners, but if anyone is a worshiper of God and does his will, God listens to him.

[SUP]
32 [/SUP]Never since the world began has it been heard that anyone opened the eyes of a man born blind.

[SUP]
33 [/SUP]If this man were not from God, he could do nothing.”


[SUP]
34 [/SUP]They answered him, “You were born in utter sin, and would you teach us?” And they cast him out. ( again typical D.I.Y holiness types response by attacking his character because he doesn't believe what they believe about Jesus )


[SUP]35 [/SUP]Jesus heard that they had cast him out, and having found him he said, “Do you believe in the Son of Man?”

[SUP]36 [/SUP]He answered, “And who is he, sir, that I may believe in him?”

[SUP]37 [/SUP]Jesus said to him, “You have seen him, and it is he who is speaking to you.”

[SUP]
38 [/SUP]He said, “Lord, I believe,” and he worshiped him. ( this is the response of us to the grace of the gospel of Christ and seeing the great love of our Lord and worshipping Him only )

[SUP]39 [/SUP]Jesus said, “For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and those who see may become blind.”

[SUP]
40 [/SUP]Some of the Pharisees near him heard these things, and said to him, “Are we also blind?”


[SUP]41 [/SUP]Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would have no guilt; but now that you say, ‘We see,’ your guilt remains .
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,453
13,394
113
58
#40
Matthew 23 23
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
Things do not end well for the Pharisees! Matthew 23:14 - Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you devour widows’ houses, and for a pretense make long prayers. Therefore you will receive greater condemnation. :eek: