I think we are missing one of the most important things to consider - with every one of these wives - comes a mother-in-law...Just sayin'...selah
The whole concept is problematic. Selah indeed.
I think we are missing one of the most important things to consider - with every one of these wives - comes a mother-in-law...Just sayin'...selah
This is a tough one. You do go beyond what scripture says. The NT passages you quoted actually affirms that some people at that time and culture lived in polygamous families. They were not be given certain offices, but nothing says that their families were to be broken up. Many of the believers around that time were jews, who did live that way. As much as anyone searches, scripture has no blatant statement either for or against the practice. Though certainly the NT would not condone it, there is no outright condemnation against it. Where scripture speak, we speak, where scripture is silent, we be silent. It is something to be left out and not mentioned. As is the custom in many non-western societies even today. For the one who can receive it.Yes, it is a sin to have more than one wife.
Deuteronomy 17:17 - Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.
1 Timothy 3:2 - A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
1 Corinthians 7:2 - Nevertheless, [to avoid] fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
1 Timothy 3:12 - Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well.
Ephesians 5:31 - For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.
Titus 1:6 - If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly.
You must have missed this:This is a tough one. You do go beyond what scripture says. The NT passages you quoted actually affirms that some people at that time and culture lived in polygamous families. They were not be given certain offices, but nothing says that their families were to be broken up. Many of the believers around that time were jews, who did live that way. As much as anyone searches, scripture has no blatant statement either for or against the practice. Though certainly the NT would not condone it, there is no outright condemnation against it. Where scripture speak, we speak, where scripture is silent, we be silent. It is something to be left out and not mentioned. As is the custom in many non-western societies even today. For the one who can receive it.
I think we are missing one of the most important things to consider - with every one of these wives - comes a mother-in-law...Just sayin'...selah
This is a tough one. You do go beyond what scripture says. The NT passages you quoted actually affirms that some people at that time and culture lived in polygamous families. They were not be given certain offices, but nothing says that their families were to be broken up. Many of the believers around that time were jews, who did live that way. As much as anyone searches, scripture has no blatant statement either for or against the practice. Though certainly the NT would not condone it, there is no outright condemnation against it. Where scripture speak, we speak, where scripture is silent, we be silent. It is something to be left out and not mentioned. As is the custom in many non-western societies even today. For the one who can receive it.
Yup. (I tried giving you a rep for your verses before, alas... the usual problem.)i disagree
scripture makes it clear as day....
This is a tough one. You do go beyond what scripture says. The NT passages you quoted actually affirms that some people at that time and culture lived in polygamous families. They were not be given certain offices, but nothing says that their families were to be broken up. Many of the believers around that time were jews, who did live that way. As much as anyone searches, scripture has no blatant statement either for or against the practice. Though certainly the NT would not condone it, there is no outright condemnation against it. Where scripture speak, we speak, where scripture is silent, we be silent. It is something to be left out and not mentioned. As is the custom in many non-western societies even today. For the one who can receive it.
Yes...there was some...spiritual connection...and confusion (until the SPIRIT would come and teach us what was hidden from us)...tied to having many...brides.It meant something different in the OT times than today. David, who was according to the heart of God and Jesus is called his son, would be a mass adulterer.
Similarly with Abraham.
Psalm 51 shows that Nathan told David his sin and David became aware that he had done evil in the sight of GODI can't believe David is being slated like that....
And Psalm 51Why not?
2 Samuel 12:9
Why did you despise the word of the Lord by doing what is evil in his eyes? You struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword and took his wife to be your own. You killed him with the sword of the Ammonites.
No, it does not say what you what to put into it. But you are entitled to your own opinion.i disagree
scripture makes it clear as day....
No, it does not say what you what to put into it. But you are entitled to your own opinion.
LOL!What level of suffering must a man desire to actually WANT MORE THAN ONE WIFE?
View attachment 173654
No, it does not say what you what to put into it. But you are entitled to your own opinion.
There's a significant degree of emotionalism and lack of comprehension over this practice. "Well if i don't like it, if it's abnormal to society i'll some how say the bible never advocated it". It doesn't work that way. We take the bible for what it is, God's ultimate word, and the reality is, irrespective of how many tantrums are thrown, polygamy was acceptable.
There are none, compared to those I gave about remaining FAITHFUL to the wife of your youth.Can you name even one verse that says it was acceptable to God?