Well, I'm struggling between answering the question and allowing people to participate, which is no doubt your aim. Even though I can't help but assume you've already answered the question for yourself and are using it to bait conversation, I must indulge myself. Lynx is right, a straight comparison of area will not do in this instance. What needs to be taken into account is the length and width of each pattern to be cut and those divided somewhat categorically by width first (ie: patterns that are wider than half of the width of the material go in their own category because you can't put two of them beside each other.) Using this method and adding a set amount to the length and widths of each cut for padding, you could maximize the efficiency of your placement. However the human brain is great and can do all of this visually without a bunch of math, so my solution would be to lay out your patterns on top of the fabric and then cut the length of fabric you need.