Which Corporations Control the World? - International Business Degree Guide Our world is litterally controlled by banks and power hunger businesses which definitely do not walk the righteous path we may place president who are god fearing in charge but how much affect does that have if any have we lost control I fear we are heading to self destruction due to industry , marketing advertising are we lost sheep ?
World run by business using Christianity name in vein to sway votes.
- Thread starter Justice777
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A Lie?
John 8:44
"You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Peace.
John 8:44
"You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Peace.
We have lost the world only if we choose to surrender it.... as many of us have already done.
Colonialism And Corporatocracy
In my studies, I've come across various informational videos...this is one of them. Note: No video, website, history book is entirely 100% accurate, but based on what I've seen and read, this is the system / establishment as I understand it.
1. The Queen delegates...the black nobility (wealthy families and politicians who own the corporations) rule and serve Crown interests.
2. The President of the United States is the CEO of the United States of America, Inc. (The USA is still a British Colony?)
There seems to be a quest for world domination to solidify the British Empire/Crown, though Russia, France, and virtually every other country are now puppet pseudo governments. Iraq and Libya have fallen via the label of terrorist states...and Iran will soon be (if it's not already) a BP / British Petroleum interest.
There remains an illusion of sovereignty, however, the reality remains that the black nobility which runs the various governments/countries are all in league to defraud and enslave their respective citizens.
We are all slaves to the Crown (not of life), and this existence...well, I guess it's what you make of it.
Consider these three power bases...Washington D.C., The City of London (London Corporation), and the Vatican. Military, Financial, and Religion. All three would seem to be needed to enslave / control the world.
The citizens of virtually every country are now hopelessly brainwashed slaves / sheeple...and led to the slaughter (pollution and pharmaceutical related cancers, wars, poverty, famine) regularly.
Shear and slaughter the lambs of God?
[video=youtube;o8k-T6dyZnM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8k-T6dyZnM[/video]
How Queen Elizabeth is a Zionist & Rules the World!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cA_ybgTRSUs
Revelation 17:4 The woman was dressed in purple and scarlet, and was glittering with gold, precious stones and pearls. She held a golden cup in her hand, filled with abominable things and the filth of her adulteries.
I used to think that Israel was the whore/great harlot of Babylon...now I'm leaning toward the Queen/Crown. I highly doubt the Queen will live forever, and Charles will eventually be King...so the great harlot is probably the Crown organization, which seems to have roots in Judaism and/or the Kaballah.
The Dragons & 666 Heraldry of Prince Charles of Wales
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nF6lMQTVDM
http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/colony2.html
"The Revolutionary War was fought and concluded when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington at Yorktown. As Americans we have been taught that we defeated the king and won our freedom. The next document I will use is the Treaty of 1783, which will totally contradict our having won the Revolutionary War. (footnote 2).
I want you to notice in the first paragraph that the king refers to himself as prince of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States. You know from this that the United States did not negotiate this Treaty of peace in a position of strength and victory, but it is obvious that Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams negotiated a Treaty of further granted privileges from the king of England. Keep this in mind as you study these documents. You also need to understand the players of those that negotiated this Treaty. For the Americans it was Benjamin Franklin Esgr., a great patriot and standard bearer of freedom. Or was he? His title includes Esquire.
An Esquire in the above usage was a granted rank and Title of nobility by the king, which is below Knight and above a yeoman, common man. An Esquire is someone that does not do manual labor as signified by this status, see the below definitions.
"Esquires by virtue of their offices; as justices of the peace, and others who bear any office of trust under the crown....for whosever studieth the laws of the realm, who studieth in the universities, who professeth the liberal sciences, and who can live idly, and without manual labor, and will bear the port, charge, and countenance of a gentleman, he shall be called master, and shall be taken for a gentleman." Blackstone Commentaries p. 561-562
"Esquire - In English Law. A title of dignity next above gentleman, and below knight. Also a title of office given to sheriffs, serjeants, and barristers at law, justices of the peace, and others." Blacks Law Dictionary fourth ed. p. 641
Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and John Jay as you can read in the Treaty were all Esquires and were the signers of this Treaty and the only negotiators of the Treaty. The representative of the king was David Hartley Esqr..
Benjamin Franklin was the main negotiator for the terms of the Treaty, he spent most of the War traveling between England and France. The use of Esquire declared his and the others British subjection and loyalty to the crown.
In the first article of the Treaty most of the kings claims to America are relinquished, except for his claim to continue receiving gold, silver and copper as gain for his business venture. Article 3 gives Americans the right to fish the waters around the United States and its rivers. In article 4 the United States agreed to pay all bona fide debts. If you will read my other papers on money you will understand that the financiers were working with the king. Why else would he protect their interest with this Treaty?
I wonder if you have seen the main and obvious point? This Treaty was signed in 1783, the war was over in 1781. If the United States defeated England, how is the king granting rights to America, when we were now his equal in status? We supposedly defeated him in the Revolutionary War! So why would these supposed patriot Americans sign such a Treaty, when they knew that this would void any sovereignty gained by the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War? If we had won the Revolutionary War, the king granting us our land would not be necessary, it would have been ours by his loss of the Revolutionary War. To not dictate the terms of a peace treaty in a position of strength after winning a war; means the war was never won. Think of other wars we have won, such as when we defeated Japan. Did McArther allow Japan to dictate to him the terms for surrender? No way! All these men did is gain status and privilege granted by the king and insure the subjection of future unaware generations. Worst of all, they sold out those that gave their lives and property for the chance to be free."
I really despise being lied to and enslaved, don't you?
Peace.
In my studies, I've come across various informational videos...this is one of them. Note: No video, website, history book is entirely 100% accurate, but based on what I've seen and read, this is the system / establishment as I understand it.
1. The Queen delegates...the black nobility (wealthy families and politicians who own the corporations) rule and serve Crown interests.
2. The President of the United States is the CEO of the United States of America, Inc. (The USA is still a British Colony?)
There seems to be a quest for world domination to solidify the British Empire/Crown, though Russia, France, and virtually every other country are now puppet pseudo governments. Iraq and Libya have fallen via the label of terrorist states...and Iran will soon be (if it's not already) a BP / British Petroleum interest.
There remains an illusion of sovereignty, however, the reality remains that the black nobility which runs the various governments/countries are all in league to defraud and enslave their respective citizens.
We are all slaves to the Crown (not of life), and this existence...well, I guess it's what you make of it.
Consider these three power bases...Washington D.C., The City of London (London Corporation), and the Vatican. Military, Financial, and Religion. All three would seem to be needed to enslave / control the world.
The citizens of virtually every country are now hopelessly brainwashed slaves / sheeple...and led to the slaughter (pollution and pharmaceutical related cancers, wars, poverty, famine) regularly.
Shear and slaughter the lambs of God?
[video=youtube;o8k-T6dyZnM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8k-T6dyZnM[/video]
How Queen Elizabeth is a Zionist & Rules the World!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cA_ybgTRSUs
Revelation 17:4 The woman was dressed in purple and scarlet, and was glittering with gold, precious stones and pearls. She held a golden cup in her hand, filled with abominable things and the filth of her adulteries.
I used to think that Israel was the whore/great harlot of Babylon...now I'm leaning toward the Queen/Crown. I highly doubt the Queen will live forever, and Charles will eventually be King...so the great harlot is probably the Crown organization, which seems to have roots in Judaism and/or the Kaballah.
The Dragons & 666 Heraldry of Prince Charles of Wales
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nF6lMQTVDM
http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/colony2.html
"The Revolutionary War was fought and concluded when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington at Yorktown. As Americans we have been taught that we defeated the king and won our freedom. The next document I will use is the Treaty of 1783, which will totally contradict our having won the Revolutionary War. (footnote 2).
I want you to notice in the first paragraph that the king refers to himself as prince of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States. You know from this that the United States did not negotiate this Treaty of peace in a position of strength and victory, but it is obvious that Benjamin Franklin, John Jay and John Adams negotiated a Treaty of further granted privileges from the king of England. Keep this in mind as you study these documents. You also need to understand the players of those that negotiated this Treaty. For the Americans it was Benjamin Franklin Esgr., a great patriot and standard bearer of freedom. Or was he? His title includes Esquire.
An Esquire in the above usage was a granted rank and Title of nobility by the king, which is below Knight and above a yeoman, common man. An Esquire is someone that does not do manual labor as signified by this status, see the below definitions.
"Esquires by virtue of their offices; as justices of the peace, and others who bear any office of trust under the crown....for whosever studieth the laws of the realm, who studieth in the universities, who professeth the liberal sciences, and who can live idly, and without manual labor, and will bear the port, charge, and countenance of a gentleman, he shall be called master, and shall be taken for a gentleman." Blackstone Commentaries p. 561-562
"Esquire - In English Law. A title of dignity next above gentleman, and below knight. Also a title of office given to sheriffs, serjeants, and barristers at law, justices of the peace, and others." Blacks Law Dictionary fourth ed. p. 641
Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and John Jay as you can read in the Treaty were all Esquires and were the signers of this Treaty and the only negotiators of the Treaty. The representative of the king was David Hartley Esqr..
Benjamin Franklin was the main negotiator for the terms of the Treaty, he spent most of the War traveling between England and France. The use of Esquire declared his and the others British subjection and loyalty to the crown.
In the first article of the Treaty most of the kings claims to America are relinquished, except for his claim to continue receiving gold, silver and copper as gain for his business venture. Article 3 gives Americans the right to fish the waters around the United States and its rivers. In article 4 the United States agreed to pay all bona fide debts. If you will read my other papers on money you will understand that the financiers were working with the king. Why else would he protect their interest with this Treaty?
I wonder if you have seen the main and obvious point? This Treaty was signed in 1783, the war was over in 1781. If the United States defeated England, how is the king granting rights to America, when we were now his equal in status? We supposedly defeated him in the Revolutionary War! So why would these supposed patriot Americans sign such a Treaty, when they knew that this would void any sovereignty gained by the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War? If we had won the Revolutionary War, the king granting us our land would not be necessary, it would have been ours by his loss of the Revolutionary War. To not dictate the terms of a peace treaty in a position of strength after winning a war; means the war was never won. Think of other wars we have won, such as when we defeated Japan. Did McArther allow Japan to dictate to him the terms for surrender? No way! All these men did is gain status and privilege granted by the king and insure the subjection of future unaware generations. Worst of all, they sold out those that gave their lives and property for the chance to be free."
I really despise being lied to and enslaved, don't you?
Peace.
P
pckts
Guest
Re: Colonialism And Corporatocracy
Ok, I'm all for being open to us losing the revolutionary war, since I'm aware information is controlled, that was a long time ago, and we had few issues with Brittan since then and have been heir ally. It would be a very clever way to regain control of a rebellion without having the prisoners riot again. Seems pretty elaborate and difficult to believe a nation would swallow it's pride and pretend to lose a war and control, but I'm open to elaborate.
What was the war of 1812 given this premise? Why did they come and burn the white house down (or did it happen as we are told)? Was this an attempt at rebellion quickly shut down? Is there any other time period the crown could have regained control with political corruption, or has it been an elaborate conspiracy from the beginning.
Ok, I'm all for being open to us losing the revolutionary war, since I'm aware information is controlled, that was a long time ago, and we had few issues with Brittan since then and have been heir ally. It would be a very clever way to regain control of a rebellion without having the prisoners riot again. Seems pretty elaborate and difficult to believe a nation would swallow it's pride and pretend to lose a war and control, but I'm open to elaborate.
What was the war of 1812 given this premise? Why did they come and burn the white house down (or did it happen as we are told)? Was this an attempt at rebellion quickly shut down? Is there any other time period the crown could have regained control with political corruption, or has it been an elaborate conspiracy from the beginning.
Free Your Mind
At the bottom of the page is this excerpt...there's a lot more data on the subject I'm sure...
http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/colony2.html
"Early on in our history the king was satisfied with the interest made by the Bank of the United States. But when the Bank Charter was canceled in 1811 it was time to gain control of the government, in order to shape government policy and public policy. Have you never asked yourself why the British, after burning the White House and all our early records during the War of 1812, left and did not take over the government. The reason they did, was to remove the greatest barrier to their plans for this country. That barrier was the newly adopted 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The purpose for this Amendment was to stop anyone from serving in the government who was receiving a Title of nobility or honor. It was and is obvious that these government employees would be loyal to the granter of the Title of nobility or honor.
The War of 1812 served several purposes. It delayed the passage of the 13th Amendment by Virginia, allowed the British to destroy the evidence of the first 12 states ratification of this Amendment, and it increased the national debt, which would coerce the Congress to reestablish the Bank Charter in 1816 after the Treaty of Ghent was ratified by the Senate in 1815."
What I found enlightening, look at the wars involving the USA. Look at the allies. Look at who the wars were fought against.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States
And for truly offensive...look at what George Washington did to his own countrymen just years after the Revolution...when I read this, I realized that things are not what they seem. On a side note (pun optional)...if you examine every president on a Federal Reserve note or coin...I think you'll find that they were immortalized for a reason...yes, Lincoln as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiskey_Rebellion
Tonight I was revisiting an old friend...I've spoken to Max via e-mail several times about a decade ago. He's still trying to wake people up. I'm not sure if he's a shill or not...he's still alive and kicking so...who knows? It seems that most non-shills that are viewed as a threat end up dead. Anyway, it's hard to know who to trust these days, however, he speaks a lot of truth in his videos and lectures.
*** WARNING *** Max Igan speaks his mind, and he's not afraid to use profanity regularly. Again, I take truth where I find it. I think if you can get past the vulgarities, you'll find his philosophies refreshingly beautiful and true.
[video=youtube;6vpwClsk4Nc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vpwClsk4Nc[/video]
Peace.
At the bottom of the page is this excerpt...there's a lot more data on the subject I'm sure...
http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/colony2.html
"Early on in our history the king was satisfied with the interest made by the Bank of the United States. But when the Bank Charter was canceled in 1811 it was time to gain control of the government, in order to shape government policy and public policy. Have you never asked yourself why the British, after burning the White House and all our early records during the War of 1812, left and did not take over the government. The reason they did, was to remove the greatest barrier to their plans for this country. That barrier was the newly adopted 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The purpose for this Amendment was to stop anyone from serving in the government who was receiving a Title of nobility or honor. It was and is obvious that these government employees would be loyal to the granter of the Title of nobility or honor.
The War of 1812 served several purposes. It delayed the passage of the 13th Amendment by Virginia, allowed the British to destroy the evidence of the first 12 states ratification of this Amendment, and it increased the national debt, which would coerce the Congress to reestablish the Bank Charter in 1816 after the Treaty of Ghent was ratified by the Senate in 1815."
What I found enlightening, look at the wars involving the USA. Look at the allies. Look at who the wars were fought against.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States
And for truly offensive...look at what George Washington did to his own countrymen just years after the Revolution...when I read this, I realized that things are not what they seem. On a side note (pun optional)...if you examine every president on a Federal Reserve note or coin...I think you'll find that they were immortalized for a reason...yes, Lincoln as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiskey_Rebellion
Tonight I was revisiting an old friend...I've spoken to Max via e-mail several times about a decade ago. He's still trying to wake people up. I'm not sure if he's a shill or not...he's still alive and kicking so...who knows? It seems that most non-shills that are viewed as a threat end up dead. Anyway, it's hard to know who to trust these days, however, he speaks a lot of truth in his videos and lectures.
*** WARNING *** Max Igan speaks his mind, and he's not afraid to use profanity regularly. Again, I take truth where I find it. I think if you can get past the vulgarities, you'll find his philosophies refreshingly beautiful and true.
[video=youtube;6vpwClsk4Nc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vpwClsk4Nc[/video]
Peace.
P
pckts
Guest
Re: Free Your Mind
OK thank you, I will look into all of this and come back and talk about it.
It really makes sense that you don't beat "freedom fighters" into submission. You just eventually convince them they are free and go back to work. I would just think they would have a larger military and they would be the evil empire of the world and not the Usa, but evil can be cunning enough to have a scapegoat and get someone else to fight their battles.
OK thank you, I will look into all of this and come back and talk about it.
It really makes sense that you don't beat "freedom fighters" into submission. You just eventually convince them they are free and go back to work. I would just think they would have a larger military and they would be the evil empire of the world and not the Usa, but evil can be cunning enough to have a scapegoat and get someone else to fight their battles.