Yea but he doesn’t exercise that right concerning his theological stance on scripture.I respect your right to be totally wrong.
Blessings
Bill
Yea but he doesn’t exercise that right concerning his theological stance on scripture.I respect your right to be totally wrong.
I respect your right to be totally wrong.
[video=youtube;f3UCAQSFxCQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3UCAQSFxCQ[/video]
Thanks for coming out in the open as being against proper contextual interpretation in favor of tradition.
Basically it is Biblical doctrine or "the doctrines of grace".
T = Total Depravity
U = Unconditional Election
L = Limited Atonement
I = Irresistible Grace
P = Perseverance of the saints.
Both Calvinism and Lutheran were names that opponents the two men’s theological beliefs concerning scripture.Why is ti called Calvinist then, honestly that is something that always threw me off about Lutheran, Calvinist, etc...
You misunderstand----------
Your Calvinist view is contrary to Scripture.
Salvation is offered to all, not just the chosen.
Both Calvinism and Lutheran were names that opponents the two men’s theological beliefs concerning scripture.
Note neither guy had a original bone in their bodies both used scripture and referenced early church fathers in their
publications.
My opinion the Lord used men like these two to bring us out of the RCC at ione of its highest times of heresy
Blessings
Bill
Not hardly----------
What is really happening is you're the Romans 9:20 man who holds disdain for God's Sovereignty in electing mercy and Grace.
Salvation is only for those whom God elected. It has never been offered to every single person who has ever lived. You don't know Scripture or what you're talking about.
Now, instead of your ad hominem of ignorance, address the trailers, and refute the points. With Scripture.
II Peter 3:9
John 3:16
The context is the elect of whom God waits patiently for their repentance and fulfillment in time which is the point of the context. But you don't like contextual interpretation over your tradition. The "usward" refers to the elect, and to them only, as none other will be saved, note also 2 Timothy 2:8-10.
You don't like God electing whom He wills. Right?
"The world" doesn't mean each and every person who has ever lived. It means those other than Jews as well, something striking to a Jew, who penned this, which would, shockingly to them, include Gentiles thus, "the world."
But again, you don't like contextual interpretations going against your tradition.
Is this thread about the movie
are <sic> just another slick cover up to create another Calvinist elect are smarter and better than the rest of christians <sic> thread?
The context is the elect of whom God waits patiently for their repentance and fulfillment in time which is the point of the context. But you don't like contextual interpretation over your tradition. The "usward" refers to the elect, and to them only, as none other will be saved, note also 2 Timothy 2:8-10.
You don't like God electing whom He wills. Right?
"The world" doesn't mean each and every person who has ever lived. It means those other than Jews as well, something striking to a Jew, who penned this, which would, shockingly to them, include Gentiles thus, "the world."
But again, you don't like contextual interpretations going against your tradition, right?
That was the intent.
You mean you don't claim Romans 8:28-39 for yourself?????
Thanks brother, now stick to the intent, like you tell other people to do in other threads.