Thanks guys, I feel so much better. I was not adjusting well. My Mom is a teacher and didn't understand why I was struggling, Dad said my teacher was an idiot. I felt like I needed some more opinions lol. Even though I do still feel like I'm being "forced" to drink slanted material, I now understand that's just the way the world is and I can spit it out when class is over. I'll dodge his swings in class, I don't know enough to say anything and it doesn't seem appropriate so I'll just get the grade and learn more about it as I go. Thanks again!
By the way, the point for sharing that practical joke video is to wonder if the teacher saw something like that, would he call a scientist and the media or would he call an exorcist?
Some questions for yourself to know and consider about the evolution theory;
Science is about what can be observed and proven; therefore is the medthod for macroevolution is unknown, why science says it is true?
How can anything be confirmed by our dating method beyond human history when there are errant dating results within human history like the carbon dating of a living mollusks as 2,300 years old dead?
How can we believe anything science says about the evolution theory as fact when they used to say without a doubt that birds evolving from the dinosaurs, they now say that the dinosaurs have evolved from the birds?
How can gradual macroevolution still be taken to be true when Steven Jay Gould postulated "Punctuated Equilibrium" or "Rapid Macroevolution" that he says along with other leading scientists in the evolution theory that there is too huge a gap in the fossil records for gradual macroevolution to be true? How can science say both are true when Punctuated Macroevolution was postulated because gradual macroevolution cannot be true?
Isn't macroevolution just an elaborate way of proving that spontaneous generation is true in the realm of the theoritical even though it cannot be observed nor proven, thus a false science as opposed to what real science is when it has disproven spontaneous generation?
Why is it that they treat the theory of evolution as some unbending law while treating the laws of science as if they are bendable in order for them to say that?
These are scientific questions and you may not want to ask them in class until you done research on it for references to back up those questions, but this is to show you why christians are being persecuted in the world and christians get offended at the Bible because of that false science for what it is.
It is a good idea to not challenge the status quo in the class if you prefer a good grade but if the Lord leads you otherwise by asking scientific questions based on common sense, they really cannot prove that man evolved from the monkey.
Indeed, check and see if there is a Bible study group on campus to use for your spare time if you feel like your faith is wavering.
Jesus validated scripture and referred to Noah's flood as a warning to believers of what is coming to be ready to go as well as abiding in Him as His disciple when He comes as the Bridegroom to escape what is coming on the earth, otherwise they would be received later on as His after the great tribulation. Luke 21:33-36 & Luke 17:26-37 & Luke 12:40-49 in the KJV
If you read this, then perhap the Lord has led you back to consider those scriptural references above to strengthen your faith in Him and His words to not allow that false science which is still hypothesizing in the dark to overthrow your faith.
1 Timothy 6:[SUP]20 [/SUP]O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:[SUP]21 [/SUP]Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.