Is Son of man coming in the cloud at 1 st century?
Yes, clouds of Roman armies.
But it wasn't a resurrection coming, the resurrection for salvation (2nd) has yet to take place.
Is Son of man coming in the cloud at 1 st century?
Yes, clouds of Roman armies.
But it wasn't a resurrection coming, the resurrection for salvation (2nd) has yet to take place.
Matthew 24:30New International Version (NIV)
30 “Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth[a] will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory.[b]
so In the first century Jesus come in the clouds of Roman army?
is Roman army fly oN the sky
than all the people of the earth mourn?
I do not think in the first century all the people of the earth mourn, Roman people not mourn, they win.
so your interpretation not accurate.
lol, Salvation does include deliverance from the wrath to come,,,that is if today an child is born and is under penalty of an "future judgement" after today then all has not been set forth from it's judgement. If today judgement is final and an child is born, then they are innocent,paid for, and cannot face the wrath to come and so all of the preaching is null and void...
At what point did Roman soldiers become angelic beings?Yes, clouds of Roman armies.
At what point did Roman soldiers become angelic beings?
When the Bible says that Christ will come WITH clouds, that is a metaphor for multitudes of angels and saints surrounding Christ, all dressed in white, and radiating light, and giving the appearance of clouds moving down from Heaven to earth. And this is still future, so no one should try and mislead people by claiming that the second coming of Christ is already an accomplished fact.
There has never been a time of UNIVERSAL MOURNING AND LAMENTATION as the world inhabitants have literally (visibly) seen Christ coming with power and great glory. So His having already come is complete nonsense, since this world would have been purified and perfected completely had He already come.
Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. (Mt 26:64).
And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. (Mt 24:30).
That's what I would that you all would speak about under this thread title,,,that is after ad70 are there "some who are born and lived and are still under judgement?",day of the Lord,resurrection of some into fire and others into happiness eternal and such,lol....that would bring it to its head you know in the midst of pondering...
I stumped a preterist once and asked him about the 7 thunders. I heard nothing for months.
At what point did Roman soldiers become angelic beings?
When the Bible says that Christ will come WITH clouds, that is a metaphor for multitudes of angels and saints surrounding Christ, all dressed in white, and radiating light, and giving the appearance of clouds moving down from Heaven to earth.
And this is still future, so no one should try and mislead people by claiming that the second coming of Christ is already an accomplished fact.
There has never been a time of UNIVERSAL MOURNING AND LAMENTATION as the world inhabitants have literally (visibly) seen Christ coming with power and great glory.
So His having already come is complete nonsense, since this world would have been purified and perfected completely had He already come.
Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. (Mt 26:64).
And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. (Mt 24:30).
Please go to the thread "end times", Page 5, post 86.
These verses are about the end of the times of the gentiles and the restoration of Jerusalem.
I read that post, It do not say at 70 AD Jesus come destroy temple.
Roman army, not Jesus who destroy temple at 70, how you say Jesus come destroy temple? If Jesus come to destroy temple, He do not need an army. He just speak, It more than enough to destroy the whole world, not only temple.
I stumped a preterist once and asked him about the 7 thunders. I heard nothing for months.
Well you certainly stole his thunder.I stumped a preterist once and asked him about the 7 thunders. I heard nothing for months.
You are right, but you didn't ask about that.
That post was about those specific verses.
Notice the mention of the eagles v 28 (KJV), the emblem of Rome.
How could Rome destroy Jerusalem, with God protecting Jerusalem?
No army could.
It was the withdrawing of God's protection that allowed Rome to destroy Jerusalem.
Jesus compared it to the flood of Noah's day.
In the OT God brought armies against His people when they disobeyed Him See Ezek 38:4.
In this case Jesus said that these things would happen as the result of Israel rejecting Him and the gospel kingdom.
So if Jesus said that they would happen, then it was His will.
If it was His will, then He caused them to come, to do His will.
And tell us, what did the 7 thunders say? Are you stumped also?
you tell us.
To understand what the 7 thunders said, you must turn to the parallel passage in Daniel 12:5-7.