It pains me to have to point this out, but Christians used this exact same logic to deny the reality of heliocentrism for centuries,
``People gave ear to an upstart astrologer who strove to show that the earth revolves, not the heavens or the firmament, the sun and the moon. Whoever wishes to appear clever must devise some new system, which of all systems is of course the very best. This fool wishes to reverse the entire science of astronomy; but sacred Scripture tells us that Joshua commanded the sun to stand still, and not the earth.'' - Martin Luther
``The eyes are witnesses that the heavens revolve in the space of twenty-four hours. But certain men, either from the love of novelty, or to make a display of ingenuity, have concluded that the earth moves; and they maintain that neither the eighth sphere nor the sun revolves.... Now, it is a want of honesty and decency to assert such notions publicly, and the example is pernicious. It is the part of a good mind to accept the truth as revealed by God and to acquiesce in it.'' - Melanchthon
Eventually, however, people came to realize that the earth did in fact revolve around the sun because the physical evidence produced by science was simply too abundant to deny and we dealt with those passages that people like Luther and Melanchthon held to be absolute propositions by understanding that they were likely simply non-technical literary devices or point-of-view descriptions of events the original authors and audience simply did not understand.
Historically, the attitude expressed above has a very high rate of being flat out wrong. What is it about your interpretation of scripture that makes it an inerrant scientific description of the physical universe? We have been using science to help us interpret scripture for centuries, what great revelation do you now have that should change this?
“The way in which I could quickly and surely demonstrate that Copernicus’s position is not contrary to the Scriptures would be to show with a thousand proofs that it is true, and that the opposite cannot hold good; thus, since two truths cannot contradict each other, it is necessary that both his theory and the Scriptures are in agreement.” - Galileo
Lurker