Baptism: is it required to be baptized in water?

  • Thread starter WingsOfFidelity
  • Start date
  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,041
1,649
113
Acts 2:38 is not water baptism.
I'm sorry Roger, but I will never agree with that. It is simply wrong.

There are too many proofs that show us that. I've gone over it so many times that I grow weary of it. One more time....

The people that Peter was addressing at Pentecost had NO concept of a "spirit baptism". None whatsoever. NOBODY did, except the apostles, and it was a totally new concept to them.

When Peter told them to repent and be baptized, all 3000 of them knew EXACTLY what he meant. Water "baptism" by immersion... because that what the word meant... to be immersed.

If Peter was telling them to be "spiritually baptized" he would have gone to great lengths to explain to them what it meant to be baptized in spirit. He would have HAD to. He did not do that, because he was not telling them to be baptized in the spirit, he was telling them to be water baptized....... exactly what JESUS told him to preach and do.


Your desire for it to be "spirit baptism" is simply that..... your desire to make scripture say what you want it to... not what it actually says.

Still love ya, brother, but I can't agree with you on this...
 

preston39

Senior Member
Dec 18, 2017
1,675
240
63
Acts 2:38 is not water baptism. The word baptize in the original Greek is to immerse like a sunken ship. If you place someone under the water like a sunken ship they will drown. This baptize can only refer to the baptism of the Holy Spirit that accompanies regeneration which is an irreversible immersion into the Holy Spirit and into Christ the Savior.

The same Greek word is used in Mark 16:16 which again confirms that it is not water baptism but Holy Spirit baptism being spoken of in the passage.

You continue to ignore proper hermeneutics so you cannot arrive at a correct understanding of the passage. Your preset dogma does not determine how the passage is understood.

Good grief man wake up arise from your slumber.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
n...,

Totally...wrong....with scripture.
 

graceNpeace

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
I'm sorry Roger, but I will never agree with that. It is simply wrong.

There are too many proofs that show us that. I've gone over it so many times that I grow weary of it. One more time....

The people that Peter was addressing at Pentecost had NO concept of a "spirit baptism". None whatsoever. NOBODY did, except the apostles, and it was a totally new concept to them.

When Peter told them to repent and be baptized, all 3000 of them knew EXACTLY what he meant. Water "baptism" by immersion... because that what the word meant... to be immersed.

If Peter was telling them to be "spiritually baptized" he would have gone to great lengths to explain to them what it meant to be baptized in spirit. He would have HAD to. He did not do that, because he was not telling them to be baptized in the spirit, he was telling them to be water baptized....... exactly what JESUS told him to preach and do.


Your desire for it to be "spirit baptism" is simply that..... your desire to make scripture say what you want it to... not what it actually says.

Still love ya, brother, but I can't agree with you on this...
Have to agree with this summary...
The actual reference to baptism in Acts 2:38 cannot be anything other than WATER baptism.

And, just that you know: I am a Charismatic who firmly believes in the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, but to try and shoehorn the reference to baptism in Acts 2:38 to anything other than WATER baptism just does extreme violence to the context...
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,437
13,372
113
58
Moot point since no one is advocating baptizing unbelievers.
Yet there are still many unbelievers/make believers who receive water baptism in various false religions and cults because they believe that they must be water baptized in order to be saved. Now such people may believe "mental assent" in the existence and historical facts about Christ and that His death, burial and resurrection "happened" yet they do not believe/trust in the death, burial and resurrection of Christ as the ALL-sufficient means of their salvation, which means they do not truly believe on the Lord Jesus Christ/believe the gospel.

Also a moot point since no one is advocating salvation by water baptism or baptismal regeneration. But you most certainly are advocating faith alone regeneration.
There are plenty of people who advocate salvation by water baptism (saved the moment we are water baptized) whether you call that baptismal remission (church of Christ) or baptismal regeneration (Roman Catholicism). Then you have those who advocate baptism for the dead (Mormons) and those who advocate must be baptized in "Jesus name only" and not in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, which the latter is said to be an invalid baptism (Oneness Pentecostals). Salvation and regeneration is through faith (rightly understood) IN CHRIST alone (Acts 10:43; 11:17; 15:8,9; Ephesians 1:13).

John 3:5 - Jesus answered, "Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.

John 4:10 - Jesus answered and said to her, "If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, 'Give Me a drink,' you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water.

John 4:14 - but whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him will never thirst. But the water that I shall give him will become in him a fountain of water springing up into everlasting life.

John 7:37 - On the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, saying, "If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink. 38 He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water." 39 But this He spoke concerning the Spirit, whom those believing in Him would receive; for the Holy Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.

1 Corinthians 12:13 - For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body--whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free--and have all been made to drink into one Spirit.

Titus 3:5 - not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit.

John 15:3 - You are already clean because of the word which I have spoken to you.

Ephesians 5:26 - that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word.

1 Peter 1:23 - having been born again, not of corruptible seed but incorruptible, through the word of God which lives and abides forever.

The Holy Spirit is the instrument of both the cleansing and the birth of the divine nature within believers. "Water" intensifies and magnifies "Spirit" by means of the many figurative ways God's Holy Spirit is shown working: as a means of God's light-and life giving Word, of spiritual power, and of cleansing.

Nothing could be further from the truth. A person professing faith and being immersion under water does not prove or signify a reality.
It does not prove or signify a reality if such a person's profession of faith is without possession, but for genuine believers, water baptism and is our public confession of faith that signifies we have been buried with Him in baptism and raised with Him to walk in newness of life.

Many people are "rebaptized", this rebaptism shows that our acts, (no matter how sincere) can never prove a reality. Many cults perform "baptisms" it does not signify they were buried or raised.
I never said that receiving water baptism is proof of the reality for EVERYONE and is especially not proof for unbelievers/make believers who receive water baptism in various false religions and cults. BUT for the genuine believer, it signifies we have been buried with Him in baptism and raised with Him to walk in newness of life.

Again, just a distraction. No one is proclaiming water immersion "literally" saves.
No distraction at all. You have said numerous times that we are saved at the point/moment of receiving water baptism, which is saying that receiving water baptism is what literally causes the change in our salvation status. Before baptism (lost) after baptism (saved) is exactly what you are saying.

But neither is it a simple symbol of that salvation since a symbol does not proof a reality.
A man and a woman become united through their wedding vows and the ring symbolizes this. Just as we become united with Christ through faith and water baptism symbolizes this. Baptism is like the receiving of rings as tokens of the covenant. The rings, like baptism, is not what actually unites the hearts of two people, but is the formal acknowledgment of it. The ring is not what causes the change in our marital status and neither does water baptism cause the change in our salvation status, yet during the wedding ceremony, vows are exchanged, "with this ring I thee wed." The symbol is used as the picture of the reality, just as in baptism. As Greek scholar AT Robertson said: A symbol is not the reality, but the picture of the reality.

Water baptism signifies that we have been buried with Christ and also raised up with Him through faith and, therefore, we are united to Him. For unbelievers/make believers, especially those in various false religions and cults, who go down into the waters of baptism without first genuinely receiving Christ through faith, become imposters, and are declaring, in baptism, to be what they are not. For such people, the symbol does not prove or signify the reality.

Peter did not call it a "symbol" in Acts 2:38 nor did Jesus command belief and a "symbol" for those who are saved in Mark 16:16.
The word "symbol" does not need to be specifically spelled out in order to figure out that it's a symbol. I have already (through properly harmonizing scripture with scripture) thoroughly explained Acts 2:38 and Mark 16:16 to you.

Baptism does not save but it is the ordained point/moment of the forgiveness of sins.
Sugar coated double talk. To say that it's the ordained point/moment of the forgiveness of sins (even though scripture shows otherwise - Acts 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:8,9; 26:18 etc..) is to say that it saves. You can't have it both ways.

Dying with belief in Jesus Christ but without the forgiveness of sins is much like going to the wedding feast but not wearing the proper clothing.
Acts 10:43 - Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins. BEFORE water baptism (Acts 10:47; 11:17,18).

Acts 26:18 - to open their eyes so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the dominion of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who have been sanctified by faith in Me.

Dying with belief in Jesus Christ without the forgiveness of sins is an oxymoron, unless the belief is mere "mental assent" belief that falls short of genuine or consummated belief resulting in salvation.

*Only genuine believers will go to the wedding feast wearing the proper clothing -- clothed in the righteousness of Christ. :)

John 3:18 - He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO) does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO) because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
 

Gabriel2020

Senior Member
May 6, 2017
1,099
41
48
Where does vain worshiping comes in? Still today people worship him with their mouth, but their hearts are far from him. The same as his people did, The Israelites.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
I'm sorry Roger, but I will never agree with that. It is simply wrong.

There are too many proofs that show us that. I've gone over it so many times that I grow weary of it. One more time....

The people that Peter was addressing at Pentecost had NO concept of a "spirit baptism". None whatsoever. NOBODY did, except the apostles, and it was a totally new concept to them.

When Peter told them to repent and be baptized, all 3000 of them knew EXACTLY what he meant. Water "baptism" by immersion... because that what the word meant... to be immersed.

If Peter was telling them to be "spiritually baptized" he would have gone to great lengths to explain to them what it meant to be baptized in spirit. He would have HAD to. He did not do that, because he was not telling them to be baptized in the spirit, he was telling them to be water baptized....... exactly what JESUS told him to preach and do.


Your desire for it to be "spirit baptism" is simply that..... your desire to make scripture say what you want it to... not what it actually says.

Still love ya, brother, but I can't agree with you on this...
You make a highly speculative rationalization of these passages. There is simply no sound hermeneutical analysis to your reasoning.

Greek is a much more precise language than English. The original documents use the word baptizo which is translated baptize. When this word is used it refers to immersion with no intent to bring back to the surface. If you were water baptized in this fashion you would drown. Bapto is the Greek word used to describe water baptism.

You make wild assumptions about what Peter would have said with no basis for your assumptions. Peter speaking in the Aramaic would have been understood by the words he selected. No person hearing him would have jumped to the false conclusion of water baptism when they heard baptizo. The Holy Spirit was moving and making Himself known in the hearts of those who were receiving the words Peter spoke.

You are acting like the Jews who heard Stephen preach the truth of Christ. They gnashed their teeth and stopped their ears falling on him and stoning him to death.

These texts disagree with you and they have stood for the truth for nearly 2000 years. Disagree with me if you must but you are responsible to the word of God.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Have to agree with this summary...
The actual reference to baptism in Acts 2:38 cannot be anything other than WATER baptism.

And, just that you know: I am a Charismatic who firmly believes in the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, but to try and shoehorn the reference to baptism in Acts 2:38 to anything other than WATER baptism just does extreme violence to the context...
Well that makes you in error on two points of scripture. The text in the original manuscripts states what has been presented that it is indeed making reference to Holy Spirit baptism unto conversion of the soul and not water baptism.

There is only one baptism of the Holy Spirit with many fillings for service.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
I would like to respond but I don't live in your world.
You cannot argue with the truth of Gods word. You can only receive it or reject it.

My life, my world is in Christ.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,041
1,649
113
You make a highly speculative rationalization of these passages. There is simply no sound hermeneutical analysis to your reasoning.

No, I am reading the scripture for what it says, using simple comprehension, and a knowledge of who was being spoken to.

Greek is a much more precise language than English. The original documents use the word baptizo which is translated baptize. When this word is used it refers to immersion with no intent to bring back to the surface. If you were water baptized in this fashion you would drown. Bapto is the Greek word used to describe water baptism.

Again, this is simply silly. When people talked about John baptizing people, NOBODY thought he was down at the river, drowning people.

You make wild assumptions about what Peter would have said with no basis for your assumptions. Peter speaking in the Aramaic would have been understood by the words he selected. No person hearing him would have jumped to the false conclusion of water baptism when they heard baptizo. The Holy Spirit was moving and making Himself known in the hearts of those who were receiving the words Peter spoke.

WILD assumptions? It's simple reasoning. You are the one assuming that all 3000 people just "knew" he was referring to a spiritual baptism.

You are acting like the Jews who heard Stephen preach the truth of Christ. They gnashed their teeth and stopped their ears falling on him and stoning him to death.

That is a horribly wrong thing to accuse a brother of. You should be ashamed.

These texts disagree with you and they have stood for the truth for nearly 2000 years. Disagree with me if you must but you are responsible to the word of God.

The texts, and the actions of believers for 1800 years or so after Jesus ascended bear out the fact that water baptism is what was taught, and practiced.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
My responses are in red. Since you cannot carry on a discussion without calling my salvation into question, I'm done with you in this thread. Your behavior is sad, indeed.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
My responses are in red. Since you cannot carry on a discussion without calling my salvation into question, I'm done with you in this thread. Your behavior is sad, indeed.
An old Baptist evangelist I heard was wont to say that if God is dialing your number you ought to pick up the phone. I'm not questioning your salvation only your improper understanding of water baptism. Your attitude is troubling because I have only given you what the bible says.

There is a place for water baptism it's just not in Acts 2:38.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
I

IAm1

Guest
It depends, Baptism is not necessary for Salvation; however, it is necessary to fulfill all righteousness as Jesus has set the example. Jesus replied "Let it be so now; it is proper for us to do this to fulfill all righteousness." Mat. 3:13-17. In other words we are to follow after Him. So if you believe in Him...then follow. Salvation alone comes through faith in Jesus Christ.


 
Last edited by a moderator:

DJ2

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2017
1,660
57
48
It depends, Baptism is not necessary for Salvation; however, it is necessary to fulfill all righteousness as Jesus has set the example. Jesus replied "Let it be so now; it is proper for us to do this to fulfill all righteousness." Mat. 3:13-17. In other words we are to follow after Him. So if you believe in Him...then follow. Salvation alone comes through faith in Jesus Christ.


Are there any consequences to not fulfilling all righteousness?
 
I

IAm1

Guest
The thief on the cross beside Jesus had not been baptized, and Jesus replied to him "Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in Paradise." Luke 23:43 There is only one requirement for eternal life "very truly I tell you, whoever hears my words and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life." John 5:24. This will best explain it: https://www.gotquestions.org/baptism-salvation.html
 

Gabriel2020

Senior Member
May 6, 2017
1,099
41
48
It does not mention it, but I bet you in an instant he was baptized in the holy ghost after that confession.
 

DJ2

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2017
1,660
57
48
Water baptism does not literally save believers, but is a symbol of salvation in that it depicts Christ's death, burial and resurrection and our identification with Him in these experiences.

There are plenty of people who advocate salvation by water baptism (saved the moment we are water baptized) whether you call that baptismal remission (church of Christ) or baptismal regeneration (Roman Catholicism). Then you have those who advocate baptism for the dead (Mormons) and those who advocate must be baptized in "Jesus name only" and not in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, which the latter is said to be an invalid baptism (Oneness Pentecostals). Salvation and regeneration is through faith (rightly understood) IN CHRIST alone (Acts 10:43; 11:17; 15:8,9; Ephesians 1:13).

John 3:5 - Jesus answered, "Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.

John 4:10 - Jesus answered and said to her, "If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, 'Give Me a drink,' you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water.

John 4:14 - but whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him will never thirst. But the water that I shall give him will become in him a fountain of water springing up into everlasting life.

John 7:37 - On the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, saying, "If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink. 38 He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water." 39 But this He spoke concerning the Spirit, whom those believing in Him would receive; for the Holy Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.

1 Corinthians 12:13 - For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body--whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free--and have all been made to drink into one Spirit.

Titus 3:5 - not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit.

John 15:3 - You are already clean because of the word which I have spoken to you.

Ephesians 5:26 - that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word.

1 Peter 1:23 - having been born again, not of corruptible seed but incorruptible, through the word of God which lives and abides forever.

The Holy Spirit is the instrument of both the cleansing and the birth of the divine nature within believers. "Water" intensifies and magnifies "Spirit" by means of the many figurative ways God's Holy Spirit is shown working: as a means of God's light-and life giving Word, of spiritual power, and of cleansing.

It does not prove or signify a reality if such a person's profession of faith is without possession, but for genuine believers, water baptism and is our public confession of faith that signifies we have been buried with Him in baptism and raised with Him to walk in newness of life.

I never said that receiving water baptism is proof of the reality for EVERYONE and is especially not proof for unbelievers/make believers who receive water baptism in various false religions and cults. BUT for the genuine believer, it signifies we have been buried with Him in baptism and raised with Him to walk in newness of life.

No distraction at all. You have said numerous times that we are saved at the point/moment of receiving water baptism, which is saying that receiving water baptism is what literally causes the change in our salvation status. Before baptism (lost) after baptism (saved) is exactly what you are saying.

A man and a woman become united through their wedding vows and the ring symbolizes this. Just as we become united with Christ through faith and water baptism symbolizes this. Baptism is like the receiving of rings as tokens of the covenant. The rings, like baptism, is not what actually unites the hearts of two people, but is the formal acknowledgment of it. The ring is not what causes the change in our marital status and neither does water baptism cause the change in our salvation status, yet during the wedding ceremony, vows are exchanged, "with this ring I thee wed." The symbol is used as the picture of the reality, just as in baptism. As Greek scholar AT Robertson said: A symbol is not the reality, but the picture of the reality.

Water baptism signifies that we have been buried with Christ and also raised up with Him through faith and, therefore, we are united to Him. For unbelievers/make believers, especially those in various false religions and cults, who go down into the waters of baptism without first genuinely receiving Christ through faith, become imposters, and are declaring, in baptism, to be what they are not. For such people, the symbol does not prove or signify the reality.

The word "symbol" does not need to be specifically spelled out in order to figure out that it's a symbol. I have already (through properly harmonizing scripture with scripture) thoroughly explained Acts 2:38 and Mark 16:16 to you.

Sugar coated double talk. To say that it's the ordained point/moment of the forgiveness of sins (even though scripture shows otherwise - Acts 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:8,9; 26:18 etc..) is to say that it saves. You can't have it both ways.

Acts 10:43 - Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins. BEFORE water baptism (Acts 10:47; 11:17,18).

Acts 26:18 - to open their eyes so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the dominion of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who have been sanctified by faith in Me.

Dying with belief in Jesus Christ without the forgiveness of sins is an oxymoron, unless the belief is mere "mental assent" belief that falls short of genuine or consummated belief resulting in salvation.

*Only genuine believers will go to the wedding feast wearing the proper clothing -- clothed in the righteousness of Christ. :)

John 3:18 - He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO) does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO) because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
Water baptism does not literally save believers, but is a symbol of salvation in that it depicts Christ's death, burial and resurrection and our identification with Him in these experiences.
Regardless of what others may be doing, it does not affect the issue. Are we required to be baptized? Your long-winded replies are purposeful distractions.

There are plenty of people who advocate salvation by water baptism (saved the moment we are water baptized) whether you call that baptismal remission (church of Christ) or baptismal regeneration (Roman Catholicism). Then you have those who advocate baptism for the dead (Mormons) and those who advocate must be baptized in "Jesus name only" and not in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, which the latter is said to be an invalid baptism (Oneness Pentecostals)
Again, just a distraction. What the church of Christ, Roman Catholics, Mormons or Oneness Pentecostals are doing is not part of this discussion. You are simply muddying the waters so as to not address the issue.

You have said numerous times that we are saved at the point/moment of receiving water baptism, which is saying that receiving water baptism is what literally causes the change in our salvation status. Before baptism (lost) after baptism (saved) is exactly what you are saying.
What I have said was that water baptism is ordained by God as the moment or point of the forgiveness of sins (Acts 2:38). If this is the case then we have a clean conscience before the Father (1st Peter 3:21). How is this "literally" any different from your faith alone regeneration theology that proclaims that our sins are forgiven at some unknown point during belief? Before so moment of faith (lost) after some moment of faith (saved) is exactly what you are saying.

Sugar coated double talk. To say that it's the ordained point/moment of the forgiveness of sins (even though scripture shows otherwise - Acts 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:8,9; 26:18 etc..) is to say that it saves. You can't have it both ways.
Sugar coated double talk. To say that faith alone is the ordained point/moment of the forgiveness of sins (even though scripture shows otherwise - Acts 2:38, 1st Peter 3:21, Mark 16:16, Acts 22:16 etc..) is to say that it saves. Neither can you have it both ways.

The symbol is used as the picture of the reality, just as in baptism
You are quite in error. Baptism is a contract much like a marriage license is a vow or pledge that binds two people together. The marriage certificate is a symbol of the legal marriage pledge. You are still legally married whether or not you actually have the certificate as a symbol of the license.

1st Peter 3:21 labels the waters of baptism as a pledge, a pledge that saves. The waters of Noah is a symbol, a symbol of our baptism.

waters of Noah = symbol
waters of baptism = pledge

I very very rarely quote anything other then the Bible but you seem to give much credence to Mr. Robertson's new age views on baptism. Well here is a quote to consider from a not so new age Christian.

St. Irenaeus (b. 115-130, d. around 200 AD). In his work titled Against Heresies, he writes,
And when we come to refute them [i.e. those heretics], we shall show in its fitting-place, that this class of men have been instigated by Satan to a denial of that baptism which is regeneration to God, and thus to a renunciation of the whole [Christian] faith. (A.H., I.21)


 
Last edited:

preston39

Senior Member
Dec 18, 2017
1,675
240
63
It depends, Baptism is not necessary for Salvation; however, it is necessary to fulfill all righteousness as Jesus has set the example. Jesus replied "Let it be so now; it is proper for us to do this to fulfill all righteousness." Mat. 3:13-17. In other words we are to follow after Him. So if you believe in Him...then follow. Salvation alone comes through faith in Jesus Christ....[/QUOTE]


I...,

You are almost there. Perhaps a little more study will work.

Baptism is required as the final cleansing step of removing sin.

I suggest you go thru The Bible and list all references. They are convincing.
 
Last edited:

DJ2

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2017
1,660
57
48
The thief on the cross beside Jesus had not been baptized, and Jesus replied to him "Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in Paradise." Luke 23:43 There is only one requirement for eternal life "very truly I tell you, whoever hears my words and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life." John 5:24. This will best explain it: https://www.gotquestions.org/baptism-salvation.html
The thief on the cross beside Jesus had not been baptized,
Not baptized? How do you know such a thing?
 
I

IAm1

Guest
Once saved a person will naturally want to get Baptized, by the leading of the Holy Spirit. Myself, I was first baptized in the Holy Spirit, it was the Spirit that lead me to baptism by water. Therefore, I was saved prior to my baptism in water. This will explain it well: https://www.gotquestions.org/baptism-salvation.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DJ2

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2017
1,660
57
48
Once saved a person will naturally want to get Baptized, by the leading of the Holy Spirit. Myself, I was first baptized in the Holy Spirit, it was the Spirit that lead me to baptism by water. Therefore, I was saved prior to my baptism in water.
You are dodging the questions.