Failure to implement 2 Timothy 2:15 has resulted in much false teaching, thus we have Farley, Prince..."joaniemarie"...and those who believe their fallacies.
Farley also teaches that the lord's prayer is not for NT Christians. He calls it an old covenant prayer. That's an abomination.
Yes I remember as a Roman Catholics it was prayed each and every time during the liturgy. Tradition of men.
There is a timeline to the revelation of the New Covenant when one grasps that, then things become much clearer
This is simply a justification of Farley's heresy. The teaching that some of Christ's words can be ignored is an abomination.
This is simply a justification of Farley's heresy. The teaching that some of Christ's words can be ignored is an abomination.
Farley also teaches that the lord's prayer is not for NT Christians. He calls it an old covenant prayer. That's an abomination.
Our Father in heaven,
Hallowed be Your name.
10 Your kingdom come.
Your will be done
On earth as it is in heaven.
11 Give us this day our daily bread.
12 And forgive us our debts,
As we forgive our debtors.
13 And do not lead us into temptation,
But deliver us from the evil one.
For Yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever.
Amen.
"In essentials, unity
In non-essentials, liberty
And in ALL things, charity"
Be blessed, brothers and sisters.
![]()
"In essentials, unity
In non-essentials, liberty
And in ALL things, charity"
Be blessed, brothers and sisters.
![]()
Joaniemarie,
You and I haven't always agreed on all things here on CC, and we won't necessarily always agree in the future. What we DO agree on, however, are the things you listed.
I've made posts in the past about who my favorite pastors and theologians are, and they don't agree with one another on every single Christian thing. But, as is the case between us, they all DO agree on the items you mentioned.
I would consider myself a little more "fundamental" than you, but that's OK. I just try to stand for the faith without being "too" confrontational. Sometimes confrontation and conflict are necessary, but I don't like to quibble over small things.
And thank you for your contributions to the CC forums!
NMBH
So because Catholics prayed the lord's prayer it's a tradition of men?
Yes every Sunday at the exact same point of the liturgy and it better not be in a different place.
If that prescribed behaviour, ritual, is not in the bible then it is a tradition of men.
It's about POST CROSS.
"And forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who tresspass against us..." That was under the old covenant before the CROSS.
Today in the new covenant we forgive because HE first forgave us. We love because HE first loved us. Now we know the reason we are forgiven and it is not because of what we do it's because of what JESUS did.
He doesn't take back His forgiveness if we don't forgive someone. That is old covenant....His forgiveness is not contingent/conditional on us but conditional/contingent on JESUS. WHO IS A SURE FOUNDATION.
This is the NEW COVENANT.
This is simply a justification of Farley's heresy. The teaching that some of Christ's words can be ignored is an abomination.
This is simply a justification of Farley's heresy. The teaching that some of Christ's words can be ignored is an abomination.
ignore at your own peril
we can skip some of what Jesus said, but we sure better not question or wonder about the teachings of the heretical individuals who teach that or decide to believe that
it's the New Gospel...the third Covenant. in fact, I think that is a good descriptive name for it
it's not what is referred to as the New Covenant by the actual authors of the NT
it's all about fresh and new revelation, but it is actually the age old question 'has God really said?'
it is the Third Covenant and it is between false teachers and the itching ears crowd
"In essentials, unity
In non-essentials, liberty
And in ALL things, charity"
Be blessed, brothers and sisters.
![]()

JGIG;3554623]You are so off base, it's almost comical.
I challenge you to listen to some of Farley's stuff.
There is no 'new gospel', 'third covenant', or any other absurd slanderous term you or those you have read about what they say he teaches can come up with.
You are posting out of complete ignorance, and that just ain't right.
-JGIG
Question for you, HRFTD: How are you typing and seeing the computer screen?
I ask because Jesus says to cut off your hand and put out your eye if they offend you. I'm guessing that in the time you've been here at CC your hands have offended at least twice and eyes the same, and should be gone by now.
If you haven't rid yourselves of your offending parts, you have ignored at least SOME of the words of Jesus.
According to you, that's an abomination.
Dismiss this point if you wish, but you DO choose to ignore, or a better phrase would be to 'rightly divide' the Word of Truth, yes?
You choose to say we must forgive IN ORDER to be forgiven as Jesus states in the 'Lord's Prayer', which was taught under the Old Covenant before He did the Work of the Cross, while we choose to say that we forgive BECAUSE we are forgiven, BECAUSE of Jesus' Work of the Cross, as taught in Ephesians and Colossians.
In my opinion, YOUR interpretation is the abomination, because it declares that NO ONE can be forgiven UNTIL they forgive others. That's salvation by works, and for the incredibly abused and wounded, an impossibility without first receiving God's forgiveness and New Life in Christ!
Believe what you like, but you are engaging in just as serious of an abomination as you accuse others of if you are still in possession of your members.
Either apply ALL of the words of Jesus or learn to rightly divide them, understanding when He was preaching Law to those under the Law and when He was pointing to the New Covenant yet to be ratified in His Blood.
-JGIG
You are so off base, it's almost comical.
I challenge you to listen to some of Farley's stuff.
There is no 'new gospel', 'third covenant', or any other absurd slanderous term you or those you have read about what they say he teaches can come up with.
You are posting out of complete ignorance, and that just ain't right.
-JGIG
That's Andrew Farley. He has really, really good series on Romans, Hebrews, and a bunch of other epistles =).
Some particularly good selections:
- Is That Really in the Bible?
- It's Not About You
- Romans - The Gift of Righteousness
- Hebrews
- 1 John
- Hot Spots
Enjoy!
-JGIG
I see you have the same lovely posting style of the Third Covenant that several others here have
the style is to comment on the poster rather than the poster's comments
I have listened to and read some of Farley's offerings. I would not comment otherwise
you would be far more believable if you did not try to denigrade me personally
I find that a person that has to stoop to this kind of immaturity, is probably more interested in winning some kind of imagined contest than discussing why another person disagrees
there is definitely a Third Covenant being presented by false teachers who are questionning what Jesus teaches and inserting their own humanist reasoning
you can defend anyone you want as long as you realize that your acceptance does not mean that others who disagree are stupid or ignorant or whatever other term you feel does your opinion justice